UCMJ
UCMJ
Posted on Dec 21, 2018
Michael Flynn. Convicted felon. Should he still receive benefits as a retired military general? Should he now be court-martialed?
906K
9.8K
3.03K
1.9K
1.9K
2
Under Article 2 of the UCMJ, the Army maintains court-martial jurisdiction over retired personnel. Army Regulation 27-10, Military Justice, states “Retired members of a regular component of the Armed Forces who are entitled to pay are subject to the provisions of the UCMJ.
Donald Trump
Crime
Spying
UCMJ
Posted 7 y ago
Responses: 1378
992
990
2
So the FBI can lie to you and not be punished but if you lie to the FBI then you go to jail. Something is wrong here.
(992)
(2)
SPC Levi Jackson
Fraizer vs Cupp Supreme Court ruling cops can lie to the public. Never trust a cop.
(1)
(0)
629
629
0
I'm of the opinion that Gen. Flynn should not be punished twice for the same offense.
(629)
(0)
SFC Robert Walton
LCDR James Jones - It depends on where you get the DUI. If it is on post the State will usually let the Military handle it. If it happens Down town you could face from the Military and the Local courts.
(1)
(0)
SPC Kent Laughlin
really ?? and your hero called his chinee counter part after illegally listening in on a presidential phone call, that is treason.. General Flynn was entrapped by a democrat rat filled fbi run by communist loving democrats of which our current batch of DC rats are overloaded with.. Unfortunately the scum in universities and the leftists in the media had grandparents in both institutions while I was serving in Vietnam. During that time punks with mush for brains were writing that we were morons for fighting the communists in an effort to allow the South Vietnamese to chose a government not rotted by commie rats from russia and china.. Senior Chief Petty Officer Randolph has encapsulated the truth...
(0)
(0)
381
380
1
So to be clear here... The General "told a lie" to the FBI while being investigated for evidence of a crime that never actually occurred? And are you advocating that the General should loose his benefits because he testified improperly in an investigation that had no basis in reality to begin with? To turn the table on this question, suppose someone accused you of beating your wife (we will assume this has never happened); there was no corroborating evidence but the police investigate anyway. In the course of your questioning you are asked what you ate for breakfast and you omitted to include the second cup of coffee you drank with creamer in it. Having obtained contradictory evidence from your eldest child, the police charge you with lying; so after being convicted in a plea deal wherein you provided testimony about your eldest child speeding the week previously - we should take your retirement check away from you... Cuz... you lied... about a fake investigation... that should never have even been started... Does this cover it?
(381)
(1)
PO2 Ken Lowder
PO1 David Kingsley - TRUMP IS COLLUDING WITH THE RUSSIANS TO STEAL THE ELECTION! Oh, wait that was killery and companiy. Yet trumps presidency is forever tarnished by these lies and crimes
(2)
(0)
1stSgt Gary Baker
Well if he was entrapped by the FBI and actually did not commit any crime other than lie to the FBI that entrapped him in the rues then NO he shouldn’t be charged or denied his benefits. And as far as the FBI goes, they should be charged with a criminal act of entrapment of a innocent person! The FBI has over stepped its bounds and authority so much that they have No Regard for the Constitution and the Rights of the American Citizens!
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google