Posted on Mar 1, 2014
SFC Air Defense Enhanced Early Warning System Operator
17.5K
36
46
1
1
0

Situation: You are a Company/Battery First Sergeant. One of your platoons has 5 Staff Sergeants. None of these staff sergeants are duds. Each of them will get the mission accomplished, though some may do so more quickly/efficiently than the others. If one of these staff sergeants (SSG Highspeed) stands out above the others would you have any qualms about placing that soldier in the platoon sergeant position (Your CSM will support your decision). SSG Highspeed has less time in grade than the other SSGs in the platoon.

 

Do you feel that duty positions should always go to the most capable?

 

What other factors should be taken into consideration when making this decision?

Posted in these groups: Rank Rank
Avatar feed
Responses: 20
1SG Brigade Security Manager
5
5
0
SSG Love,

For me it is always the most Competent Soldier.
V/r
1SG Haro 
(5)
Comment
(0)
SFC Air Defense Enhanced Early Warning System Operator
SFC (Join to see)
10 y
1SG If the most competent soldier is also the soldier with the least amount of time in grade, how does that "appointment" affect the rating chain?
(0)
Reply
(0)
MAJ Assistant Professor Of Military Science
MAJ (Join to see)
>1 y
It would make an invalid rating scheme in the organization because the PSG would be unable to rate the other SSGs. The Platoon Leader would then have to rate the squad leaders, making the Company Commander the SR Rater and the Battalion Commander the reviewer.
(0)
Reply
(0)
1SG Brigade Security Manager
1SG (Join to see)
>1 y
Sir,

I am sure anyone can be a reviewer not necessarily the BN CDR. But I do see what your saying.

V/r

1SG Haro
(0)
Reply
(0)
PV2 Abbott Shaull
PV2 Abbott Shaull
>1 y
Uhm, this is kinda of pointless, for this is one of the reasons why when you work your way up, you are likely to move companies to, so as to avoid issues like this. Yet, in the few cases, where the new PSG, was in the came company, and some of the SSG he jumped were in his/her Platoon, then yes it would make the workload for everyone above the Platoon Sergeant increase, just the more reason to move them to another unit quickly.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Robert Burns
4
4
0

What I dont agree with is how we say "yes the most capable Soldier should get the position" unless we are talking about a different rank.

In your same scenario; if a dud SFC comes in, he automatically replaces the highspeed SSG just because of his rank.  Period.  The explanation, that's how the Army works.

That is a broken system by our own rational and logic.  Because we say rank trumps logic and reason.  Say it aint so, but I bet you it is.

(4)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Infantry Officer
MAJ (Join to see)
10 y
It is so.

(0)
Reply
(0)
1SG Brigade Security Manager
1SG (Join to see)
>1 y
SSG Burns,

NOT in FSC, 84th EN BN.

V/r
1SG Haro
(1)
Reply
(0)
PV2 Abbott Shaull
PV2 Abbott Shaull
>1 y
Yes it is to a point. There have always been exception to this rule, at the very local level, and the Commanders who upheld them were always trusted in their decisions. Take Captain Winters when he was Acting XO and then Acting CO of the 2nd Bn of the 506th. There were plenty of Majors and Lt. Colonels milling about the in the 101st Airborne Division who would of love the job to lead an Infantry Battalion. It even documented that there were some Majors in the Regiment who could have asked for the either position if they had wanted it. None of these Officers in the Regiment would ask, because they knew Colonel Sink placed Captain Winters in those positions, and at Divisional HQ, they knew the same thing, and in many cases these men were more valuable where they already were at in the Division. Once Winters got promoted to Major, it wasn't that much of big deal anymore, but it was little weird seeing a Captain show up, to functions as the Battalion XO or CO wasn't easy, because he was always the junior Officer, which when he got promoted he was still 90% of the time anyways.

If the incoming NCO or Officer is a complete dud and on record of being so. There are so many creative ways for various Commanding Officers and Senior NCO's to find ways to circumvent things to keep SSG Highspeed as the Platoon Sergeant and in coming SFC far enough away, he would never know that there was platoon that was in dire needed of a SFC to fill the Platoon Sergeant slot. I mean, I have seen quite a few E-6s, E-7s, and E-8s while in the 82nd who weren't even able to be deployed any more due to this issue or that issue, but were kept around for rear detachment duty, this, and that, so they could either re-enlist for another MOS, or get 20 in to retire. It amazing considering that the at the time 82nd was suppose to be close to 100% capable of being deployed. Well as close as you can get with the injury rate with all those damn jumps.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Bradley Clark
4
4
0
Bottom line, you have the power to put in place whoever you so chose to, within your company. Only one thing you must be very careful of the good ole boy system. Stay away from that. Always put the best soldier for the job be it male or female.
(4)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close