Update logo
Logo uploaded by: SPC Aaron Clapp
National Guard Bureau, Office of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
Share this page
National Guard Bureau, Office of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
Posted on Nov 17, 2019
What AR or National Guard Bureau regulation covers fraternization between Officers and Enlisted in the National Guard?
28.7K
47
31
2
2
0
Can somebody please tell me what AR or Natl Guard Bureau Regulation covers fraternization between Officers and Enlisted in the National Guard?
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 11
MAJ Ronnie Reams
4 y
If not Federalized, methinks the States have their own military codes and justice system. I know NC does.
(0)
Reply
(0)
LTC Jason Mackay
4 y
MAJ Ronnie Reams - they might but both of those pubs addresses ARNG and Reserve
(0)
Reply
(0)
MAJ Ronnie Reams
4 y
LTC Jason Mackay , yrs, but not sure Fed's recall the suspect to AD to try suspect. So it up to State, in fact, I not sure Fed's have jurisdiction when not in AD. I am not JAG and do not play one on TV.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Posted >1 y ago
Not to be rude or anything, but I hope you do not take command any time soon until you know basic regulations
(4)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Javier Rivera
>1 y
SSG (Join to see) , you’ll be surprise on how many leaders in the guard learn the hard way! Or their fault but the lack of screw up situations they are exposed.
(2)
Reply
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
>1 y
I had been a company CO twice before I attended the "pre-command" course. Army logic.
(1)
Reply
(0)
1stSgt Mack Housman
>1 y
Gentlemen. I'm a career Air Force SNCO and have spent very little time around the Army. However, it only took about two minutes to find the answer on google. See page 81 of this document.
https://www.jagcnet.army.mil/Sites/jagc.nsf/0/EE26CE7A9678A67A85257E [login to see] /$File/CommandersLegalHandbook.pdf
https://www.jagcnet.army.mil/Sites/jagc.nsf/0/EE26CE7A9678A67A85257E [login to see] /$File/CommandersLegalHandbook.pdf
(2)
Reply
(0)
SSG (Join to see)
>1 y
And the fact that it’s in AR 600-20 otherwise known as Army Command Policy1stSgt Mack Housman
(2)
Reply
(0)
Read This Next