Upload logo
US Army Recruiting Command, US Army Training & Doctrine Command
Share this page
US Army Recruiting Command, US Army Training & Doctrine Command
Posted on Mar 23, 2017
I have misdemeanor charges from over 14 years ago and would the current active duty recruiter need to submit for a waiver now in 2017?
4.54K
19
11
1
1
0
Posted in these groups: Prior ServiceUSAREC
Posted 7 y ago
Responses: 3
Posted 7 y ago
If you processed with a waiver you will not need one again unless you have accrued new charges.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Posted 7 y ago
If you're trying to go active duty from reserves. Yes they will be looked at again. How many Misdemeanors did you have? And what were they for?
(1)
Comment
(0)
SSG Dennis Mendoza
7 y
SFC, back in 2007 the waivers were done for for misdemeanors and I still have the packet in the envelope for that 2007 enlistment.
(1)
Reply
(0)
(1)
Reply
(0)
Edited 7 y ago
Posted 7 y ago
I am a prior service currently serving in the Army reserves and waiting on a conditional release request packet to be either approve or denied by 2nd Psychological Operations Group. My question is I have misdemeanor charges from over 14 years ago and when I went in back in 2007 the recruiter back then needed to submit for waivers
(0)
Comment
(0)
SGT Jared Smith
7 y
SSG Dennis Mendoza - Yeah shouldn't be an issue, at least what I've dealt with. Right now is the easiest time to join for prior service for sure.
(2)
Reply
(0)
SSG Dennis Mendoza
7 y
SGT Jared Smith - yeah I'm noticing that they need us back in and I guess I'm returning in the right time.
(2)
Reply
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
7 y
It is true PS are being considered now more than even 6 months ago. However I will tell you moral waiver generally are approved based on the whole person concept. Recent events count more than past, and a single mistake fairs better than multiple.
(5)
Reply
(0)
SSG Dennis Mendoza
7 y
LTC (Join to see) - Hooah, sir yes I figured it was simple back in 2007 and I keep reading that prior service are enlisting back in. I'm looking forward to being back in the active duty ranks
(0)
Reply
(0)
Read This Next