Posted on Feb 6, 2016
MSgt Airborne Mission Systems
4.76K
2
4
1
1
0
Abd772d3
Posted in these groups: Fed970ac 1A3X1: Airborne Mission Systems
Avatar feed
Responses: 1
CAPT Kevin B.
1
1
0
Edited 8 y ago
As a former senior GS hiring manager, it's a quagmire primarily because OPM and EEOC look at the program differently. Secondly, we rarely saw an applicant that took proper advantage of it. OPM stipulates interviewers can discuss disability as it pertains to being physically or mentally able to do the job. EEOC says you can't ask disability related questions. HR screens the applicants for initial job suitability, hence hiring managers will initially get queries from HR about abilities needed to perform the work safely and not be a danger to themselves or others. That said, since our office was pretty much an administrative business setting, we had a sprinkling of folk who came in through the program while we made some physical accommodation for them. That's called figuring out a way for a good person to work well. There is a requirement that the employee perform at or above minimum performance levels. That's why there is a probationary period.

Sometimes HR wants to put a "disabled bean" into their pocket and I had to stand my ground over issues like "No, you can't have a blind employee walking around on a construction site." That's when you remind the HR head that they do not have line authority. That's a rare thing as good HR people know that collaboration is the best way forward with the hiring managers.

BTW, service connected disability which provides either 5 or 10 point preference (only good for initial hire, RIF, but not promotions), Veteran Recruitment Authority (VRA), Hire a Hero, and the list goes on for Military, are all tools which get used. Good hiring managers see these tools as making their life easier. The general problem we've seen with Vets overall, disabled or not, is they apply for positions for which they are not qualified to perform. It frequently hits with retired senior officers thinking we owe them a high grade GS job because they exist. Commands that do hire too many exMils for senior positions tend to lose their "business sense" and start getting sideways with HR/OPM on civilian management issues because they have no in-depth experience with this stuff. Add to that long term civilians who see they can't promote to those positions, it's a morale killer.
(1)
Comment
(0)
MSgt Airborne Mission Systems
MSgt (Join to see)
8 y
Thank you for your input, you really shed some light on this for me. I am waiting on med board and been no pay no points for a year as an air reserve technician. I hate only being able to do half my job while I wait this out. I'm a GS10 step 9 0856. I also have backgrounds in infosec,comsec,comm, telecommunications. So far I have applied for 14 jobs and not even as much as a referral. I had a GS13 HR person check my resumes, all is good. Very frustrating that I've had such hard time getting picked up. Then a Chief I know told me about SEA so here we are.
(0)
Reply
(0)
MSgt Airborne Mission Systems
MSgt (Join to see)
8 y
There are 2 guys in my unit that been sitting on med board for 2 years and 3 years. This doesn't count possibly another year of priority placement. I just want to get another civil service job instead of keep having my long time friends fly more to take up my slack. Wish they could hire against my slot since, as my commander said, I'm his broke toy.
(0)
Reply
(0)
CAPT Kevin B.
CAPT Kevin B.
8 y
SEA applies to initial entry only just as preference points do. I don't rely on HR types to say if a resume is good or not. See if you can find some ET type hiring managers who'd take a gander at it as a means of supporting a transitioning (looks like you're moving on) Reserve SM. Something is telling me you're not getting enough RESUMIX hits to get to an actual human, let alone on a cert.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close