Posted on Aug 2, 2014
SSG Robert Burns
3.26K
22
10
0
0
0
We've all used it. What do you like about it and what do you hate about it? What would you do to make it better? Do you think it has made us better on the battlefield or serves as a crutch? What is your horror or success story?
Avatar feed
See Results
Responses: 8
1SG Steven Stankovich
4
4
0
I remember using FBCB2 in Afghanistan in 2004-2005. I was a Scout PSG and had four gun trucks in my platoon. It took two missions for me to realize that my Senior Scout was using the FBCB2 to navigate...while we were rolling. We were missing turns and such and it was getting frustrating. My truck did not have FBCB2. There was only so many to go around at that time. So I switched trucks with him. I forced him to navigate the good old fashioned way...with a damn map. We didn't miss any turns or anything after that.

For us at the time, the FBCB2 was used to send up solid 10 digit grids when we were at a halt or we were in a coil for the night. Also, we used it as another means of communication with adjacent units and our higher using the FIPR.

I always did want to press the "Destroy the FBCB2 Now" button though. Never got around it making that happen...
(4)
Comment
(0)
CPT Jacob Swartout
CPT Jacob Swartout
10 y
My senior scout once thought about using the sledgehammer on it in Iraq. After all the time the S6 crew worked to get it up and going, it stops working out on mission again.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Tactical Support Branch Nec
2
2
0
Just like the radio, behind its time in the technology race. FBCB2 when working was a great asset. If you took time to get the training on it and paid attention during the class, there are many uses for it beyond getting a solid grid. Like most things in the army it starts at the top. If Brigade didn't know how to use it, it trickled down the line.

Having had to run the Troop TOC my last deployment it was generally the 1st means of non emergency communication, daily SITREPs, green 2s, logpac requests etc. The ability to create template messages made for (most the time) clear communication. Linking in with UAVs in the area, and getting their info for their imagry was pretty cool.

The problem is the battlefield for the general force is far behind the swing tech wise. I am talking about speed of the computer, clear coms on the radio. Much of this stems I believe from having to encrypt it all. On ride alongs with my buddy who is a Sherrifs deputy, they can be 20 miles out and over a mountain pass and talk back to base as if they are in the passenger seat. Problem is, anyone with a scanner can also hear it.

Until someone like Google teams up with the Military to help streamline satellite communication and imagry for the grunts on the ground, we will forever be 10 versions behind the general public.

Can only hope they are already doing that. Security first tho.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Equal Opportunity Advisor
2
2
0
I don't dislike it, but something a bit more modern wouldn't hurt. You can do a lot with the system it was just slow at times interface was bulky. I will say when our Transition Team was soooo far removed from everyone and had no radio coms i usually could reach someone on FBCB2.
(2)
Comment
(0)
SSG Robert Burns
SSG Robert Burns
10 y
True dat!
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close