Posted on Dec 16, 2013
SFC Rocky Gannon
4.53K
57
27
2
2
0

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-25399345


Would you support this, or be against it? I am against it myself.

Posted in these groups: I 1 snowden speaks vf Snowden
Avatar feed
Responses: 20
LTC Physician Assistant
6
6
0
A problem with this article is that the NSA or other intelligence agencies do not have the authority to give amnesty.  That is a function that is not delegated down from the President or appropriate legal authorities.  To the question of amnesty for Snowden is a tricky one.  An an Army Officer I hold the viewpoint that releasing classified documents inappropriately is a violation of federal law and that would betray part of the Army values, specifically Integrity.  On the other hand one could argue that Snowden's actions are in keeping with checks on governmental power and that citizens have the responsibility to notify legal authorities of illegal actions by the government.  The problem here is that if the administration in power(thus the highest legal authority and the executive order that establishes classification systems for the US) is committing the violations who do you tell?  Many of the classified documents do not violate any specific law that I am aware of but if releasing any of them does violate a law then that is a problem.  Since he was a civilian contractor he is in a different position of trust than I am and operates under different philosophies and codes of conduct.  In short, an answer to your question is difficult since it crosses several important principles and may not be possible to truly figure out. But at this point and from my perspective I have to say that he released classified documents and that violates the law thus he should be prosecuted.  Another method needs to be established to keep checks on violations of Presidential, Congressional or other governmental power.
(6)
Comment
(0)
PO1 Disaster Survivor Assistance Specialist
PO1 (Join to see)
>1 y
LTC (Join to see) In any other circumstance I might agree with you - but I think the NSA has already broached the subject with the AG and probably received agreement. Most of this is because the AG simply does not have the clearance(s) or technical expertise necessary to truely understand what Snowden has taken and it's value / non-value. This is not the first time NSA has done this and it won't be the last. Lawyers may be well educated,etc...but they ain't geek enough and they ain't intell enough to know when to open up something to the public and NOT do damage to security assets out there. There are too many compartments that simply cannot be opened for the AG to peruse thru and decide on.....
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG C Ied & Irw Instructor
4
4
0
I say no, the manner in which he sought to uncover things jeopardized the Nation's international relations and severely injured our intel.  I'm not agreeing with the programs he exposed, but I don't think pulling a Manning on this was truly in the best interest of our country, I feel he had/has ulterior motives.
(4)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGM Matthew Quick
4
4
0
Absolutely not.

Giving this traitor (or patriotic whistle-blower to some) amnesty will enable the perception that others may want to follow suit and create even more 'Edward Snowdens'.

You reap what you sow!
(4)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close