Posted on Dec 16, 2013
MISSION COMMAND - Do you (Army members) understand this?
21.6K
7
6
3
3
0
"Mission Command" replaced "Command and Control"
ADP 6-0, Mission Command
http://armypubs.army.mil/doctrine/DR_pubs/dr_a/pdf/adp6_0_new.pdf
ADP 6-0, Mission Command
http://armypubs.army.mil/doctrine/DR_pubs/dr_a/pdf/adp6_0_new.pdf
The mission command philosophy of command is one of the foundations of unified land operations.
Mission command is the exercise of authority and direction by the commander using mission orders to enable disciplined initiative within the commander’s intent to empower agile and adaptive leaders in the conduct of unified land operations.
The mission command philosophy effectively accounts for the nature of military operations. Throughout operations, unexpected opportunities and threats rapidly present themselves. Operations require responsibility and decision-making at the point of action. Through mission command, commanders initiate and integrate all military functions and actions toward a common goal—mission accomplishment.
The six principles of mission command are:
1. Build cohesive teams through mutual trust.
2. Create shared understanding.
3. Provide a clear commander’s intent.
4. Exercise disciplined initiative.
5. Use mission orders.
6. Accept prudent risk.
The six principles of mission command are:
1. Build cohesive teams through mutual trust.
2. Create shared understanding.
3. Provide a clear commander’s intent.
4. Exercise disciplined initiative.
5. Use mission orders.
6. Accept prudent risk.
Posted in these groups: 
Doctrine
Mission Command
Doctrine Mission Command
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 6
1
1
0
1
1
0
This is being taught in the Captain's Career Course across
the Army. In fact during my interview for Company Command, the Battalion Commander
asked me if I understood Mission Command and how to exercise it. So far the
other posts are on target, this is not new and good leaders have been doing it
for decades (another great idea we took from the Germans). What I like about
Mission Command is the fact that is pushes commanders to empower their
subordinate leaders and trust their NCOs. This is a good thing, whereas Command
and Control was more directive and focused on the Orders process. It was, at
times painful.
(1)
(0)
1
1
0
As SGM Brainard stated, this is not new.
Good Cdr's have been doing this for years with great success.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google