Posted on Sep 22, 2014
MAJ Robert (Bob) Petrarca
0
0
0
http://www.cnn.com/2014/09/21/us/white-house-security-incident/

I'm asking about the breach itself as I watch NBC's Today Show coverage. Not taking into account the individual or his history, which is irrelevant, the questions being asked are, "How did this happen", "Why was the Secret Service lax?" "What's going on with the Secret Service leadership?"

In my opinion this is simply fishing for a story that isn't there and stirring the pot to see what floats. I've always believed that if someone wants to do something, they will find a away, regardless of the security in place. Your thoughts?
Posted in these groups: Images SecurityWhite House
Edited >1 y ago
Avatar feed
Responses: 4
CW5 Desk Officer
3
3
0
I agree, MAJ Robert (Bob) Petrarca. During the report I saw on this subject (on CNN), the expert said the Secret Service could have killed the intruder on the lawn, but they didn't see any weapons or baggy clothes, so they let the guy come. I think I can understand that. Either the expert is covering for the Secret Service lapse or they don't want to make a scene in plain sight, where all the tourists can photograph the spectacle.

I'm guessing the Secret Service is on their game, and there is a fair amount of hype involved in this story.
(3)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Robert (Bob) Petrarca
MAJ Robert (Bob) Petrarca
>1 y
Uncle Barak and the family had just left for Camp David. I get it, its the Whitehouse, but as you point out, didn't hear that part of the story, the Secret Service made a call. Had they shot and killed an unarmed man the press would be making even more useless and pointless accusations. The press wins all the time. I'm out so I owe you 2 thumbs up Chief.
(3)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CPT Zarin N.
1
1
0
 77709559 023973346 1
I believe this is just a bit over hyped, sir. The White house has multiple layers of security like any other Federal/Military installation. If we make a baseline for the responsibilities for the Secret Service Agents patrolling the White House then we can clearly demonstrate that they accomplished their mission. The first priority would obviously be to ensure the safety of the President and Family. Second priority would be the safety of White House staff. Third would be the safety of bystanders. Fourth, unless it conflicted with any of the previous priorities, would be the apprehension or neutralization of the intruder. Fifth would be reestablishing security to include a sweep of the surrounding (in this case the entirety of the Federal Protective Zone) for any other threats. Using this baseline we can determine that:
1. POTUS and family was secure - The president was taking off in Marine One when the incident took place.
2. White House Staff were evacuated/ Sheltered in place as directed by Agents.
3. All bystanders were directed away from the scene as soon as the breach was detected.
4. The intruder was arrested before making significant progress into the White House.
5. The Federal Protective Zone was searched, his vehicle found, searched, and secured.

Was it an ideal situation? No. Was it resolved quickly ,and with minimal loss of life? Yes. A lot of the commentary has been focused on the Agents not opening fire as soon as the intruder crossed the fence, but consider what the headlines would then read: "Secret Service kill Disabled Veteran". Not to mention, had any bystanders been hit, the headlines would be even worse.
All things considered, they showed amazing restraint, responsiveness, and judgement.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
COL Signals Intelligence/Electronic Warfare
0
0
0
384131 619591718067867 672462087 n
The President is a good man. I will share his letter in this posting.

The White House
washington

Dear James:

Thank you for writing, and for your service and sacrifice. I have heard from many service members, veterans, and their families about our Nation’s foreign policy, and I appreciate your perspective.

As President, my highest priority is the safety of the American people. My Administration is using every element of our national power to keep our country secure, prosperous, and free. We have renewed our leadership in the world by strengthening old alliances and forging new partnerships to meet common challenges—from preventing terrorist attacks, reversing the global economic crisis, and responding to pandemic disease to confronting climate change, preventing the spread of nuclear weapons, and providing relief from natural crises.

After more than a decade of sacrifice, the tide of war is finally turning. The war in Iraq is over. The number of our troops in harm’s way has been cut in half, and more will soon be coming home. In Afghanistan, we have begun a transition to Afghan responsibility for security, and we have a clear path to fulfill our mission. That is why, on May 2, 2012, I signed a historic Strategic Partnership Agreement between the United States and Afghanistan which defines a new relationship between our countries as the war comes to an end. As in Iraq, we are building an enduring partnership to strengthen Afghan sovereignty and stability while advancing our shared goal of delivering justice to al-Qa’ida and contributing to the security of the region. We have devastated al-Qa’ida’s leadership—taking out over 20 of their top 30 leaders, including Osama bin Laden. The goal I set to defeat al-Qa’ida and deny it the chance to rebuild is now within our reach.

The courage and sacrifice of our men and women in uniform has promoted peace and prosperity from Germany to Korea and enabled democracy to take hold in places like Libya. Our commitment to global security will never waver, but in a world in which threats are more diffuse and missions are more complex, America cannot act alone. We will continue to align our policies with those with whom we share common values and interests. That is why NATO remains indispensable to our security. At the NATO Summit I hosted in May 2012, we took steps to ensure the Alliance has the capabilities it needs to meet 21st-century threats. At the same time, we must also strengthen the United Nations and regional peacekeeping capabilities.

America will remain committed to governments that reflect the will of their people. I have an unyielding belief that all people share some basic aspirations: to support our families, to maintain the freedom to choose our leaders, to worship as we please, and to live in peace and security. These are not just American ideas; they are human rights—and we will support them everywhere. I know the challenges faced by the international community can be met if we commit ourselves to a sustained effort to secure the universal human rights of freedom and dignity for all our children. To learn more about our foreign policy, please visit

Thank you, again, for writing.

Sincerely,

Barack Obama
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close