Posted on Jan 5, 2014
What are your thoughts on soldiers speaking a foreign language in an unofficial capacity?
8.27K
25
15
3
3
0
This is what I found about the AR regarding this policy.
AR 600-20
4–13. Army language policy: English is the operational language of the Army. Soldiers must maintain sufficient proficiency in English to perform their military duties. Their operational communications must be understood by everyone who has an official need to know their content, and, therefore, must normally be in English. However, Commanders may not require Soldiers to use English unless such use is clearly necessary and proper for the performance of military functions. Accordingly, commanders may not require the use of English for personal communications that are unrelated to military functions.
4–13. Army language policy: English is the operational language of the Army. Soldiers must maintain sufficient proficiency in English to perform their military duties. Their operational communications must be understood by everyone who has an official need to know their content, and, therefore, must normally be in English. However, Commanders may not require Soldiers to use English unless such use is clearly necessary and proper for the performance of military functions. Accordingly, commanders may not require the use of English for personal communications that are unrelated to military functions.
What are your thoughts about it?
Edited >1 y ago
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 9
4
4
0
The biggest gripe about this is the use of Spanish by bi-lingual or multi lingual Soldiers when talking in public.
My question is, how bad do you really need to know what they are talking about?
Are they issuing orders to a non Spanish speaker in Spanish? No? then don't worry about it.
Are they barely functional in English and being assigned to a Spanish speaking NCO to make dealing with them easier? Yeah, that could be a problem.
In the meantime, maintaining language skills that may become necessary in a future engagement through free flow communications should be encouraged as well as introducing Soldiers to a variety of languages.
Of course, the time I spent in MI listening to Soldiers communicate in Korean, Spanish, Russian, Persian, Arabic, French and so on, as well as the need, tends to keep me open minded to a multi-lingual environment as long as all orders are issued in English and all Soldiers are capable of comprehending in oral or written word.
My question is, how bad do you really need to know what they are talking about?
Are they issuing orders to a non Spanish speaker in Spanish? No? then don't worry about it.
Are they barely functional in English and being assigned to a Spanish speaking NCO to make dealing with them easier? Yeah, that could be a problem.
In the meantime, maintaining language skills that may become necessary in a future engagement through free flow communications should be encouraged as well as introducing Soldiers to a variety of languages.
Of course, the time I spent in MI listening to Soldiers communicate in Korean, Spanish, Russian, Persian, Arabic, French and so on, as well as the need, tends to keep me open minded to a multi-lingual environment as long as all orders are issued in English and all Soldiers are capable of comprehending in oral or written word.
(4)
(0)
4
4
0
No issues with Soldiers speaking a foreign language in an unofficial capacity. I do believe that while in mixed company, mixed languages that is, that the common language, English, should be used. I believe that is the polite thing to do.
Just for your knowledge and for this discussion, English is also the primary language for communication in NATO.
(4)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
MSG Stankovich, I agree with you. Speaking English at all times is the polite thing to do.
(0)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
MSG Stankovich, Great information on English being the primary language for communication in NATO.
(1)
(0)
MAJ (Join to see)
1SG Steven Stankovich I'm sure your French colleagues there in Brussels don't miss an opportunity to remind you that French is one of the two official languages of NATO.
(1)
(0)
1SG Steven Stankovich
You are right sir. I think that I can count on hand the number of times any correspondence, either official letter, email, or presentation, was delivered in French. But when the opportunity presents itself, they are all over it.
(0)
(0)
3
3
0
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google