Posted on Jul 2, 2015
David Axelrod lied about Hillary’s secret e-mail account. Is anyone surprised?
9.14K
42
66
4
4
0
Are you sitting down? If not, you should probably sit down, because I’m about to blow your mind.
It turns out former Obama adviser David Axelrod totally lied when he told MSNBC two weeks ago that he knew nothing of Hillary Clinton’s secret, off-books e-mail account that she used exclusively as Secretary of State.
How do we know that Axelrod wasn’t telling the truth when he said of Hillary’s secret account, “I was there. I was the senior adviser. I didn’t know that.” Because it turns out he repeatedly e-mailed Hillary on her secret account while he was there as the senior adviser.
Axelrod’s e-mails to Hillary were included in a tranche of roughly 3,000 e-mails released late last night only after a court ordered the State Department to release them.
When MSNBC’s Mika Brzezinski pressed Axelrod after he claimed on her program barely two weeks ago that he “didn’t know” about Hillary’s e-mail, he doubled down on his assertion.
“So, if you did find out when you were there, would say, ‘Hey, woah. Wait a minute, guys, should we all talk about this? Would you flag it?'” Brzezinski asked.
“I might have asked a few questions about that,” Axelrod answered.
Except he didn’t, even though we now know he absolutely knew about Hillary’s secret e-mail. Axelrod tried to stanch the bleeding this morning by claiming on Twitter that he didn’t technically lie because “the AP didn’t ask” him if he knew Hillary exclusively used a secret, off-books e-mail account as Secretary of State.
Even after last night’s release of a batch of e-mails, Hillary is yet to disclose to the public roughly 90 percent of the e-mails she says she archived. By her own admission, Hillary and her staff deleted at least 30,000 e-mails. However, because she had the e-mail server destroyed even though it was under subpoena, the public will likely never know the true number of e-mails she destroyed in order to avoid public disclosure.
It turns out former Obama adviser David Axelrod totally lied when he told MSNBC two weeks ago that he knew nothing of Hillary Clinton’s secret, off-books e-mail account that she used exclusively as Secretary of State.
How do we know that Axelrod wasn’t telling the truth when he said of Hillary’s secret account, “I was there. I was the senior adviser. I didn’t know that.” Because it turns out he repeatedly e-mailed Hillary on her secret account while he was there as the senior adviser.
Axelrod’s e-mails to Hillary were included in a tranche of roughly 3,000 e-mails released late last night only after a court ordered the State Department to release them.
When MSNBC’s Mika Brzezinski pressed Axelrod after he claimed on her program barely two weeks ago that he “didn’t know” about Hillary’s e-mail, he doubled down on his assertion.
“So, if you did find out when you were there, would say, ‘Hey, woah. Wait a minute, guys, should we all talk about this? Would you flag it?'” Brzezinski asked.
“I might have asked a few questions about that,” Axelrod answered.
Except he didn’t, even though we now know he absolutely knew about Hillary’s secret e-mail. Axelrod tried to stanch the bleeding this morning by claiming on Twitter that he didn’t technically lie because “the AP didn’t ask” him if he knew Hillary exclusively used a secret, off-books e-mail account as Secretary of State.
Even after last night’s release of a batch of e-mails, Hillary is yet to disclose to the public roughly 90 percent of the e-mails she says she archived. By her own admission, Hillary and her staff deleted at least 30,000 e-mails. However, because she had the e-mail server destroyed even though it was under subpoena, the public will likely never know the true number of e-mails she destroyed in order to avoid public disclosure.
Hillary Clinton
Government Administration
Politics
Posted 9 y ago
Responses: 20
6
6
0
SGT (Join to see) my question is why lie about e-mails? This is only making the situation worse for Hillary Clinton as the primaries draw closer! It will cross a lot of voters minds in my opinion and could dramatically affect the Presidential race. Although she has a lot of money $45 million currently raised, integrity and honor plays a big part for Presidential race! No money in the world can buy you the Presidency in my opinion.
(6)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL, IMO, She is so used to getting away with everything she has done, just like slick Willey, she doesn't worry about it. Also, most Dems are hard core and will only vote for Dems, no matter what they do. Hard core Republicans are that way also. Plus, a lot of voters vote the entire ticket. Her motto is, money, money, money and lie, lie, lie. It's gotten her this far, so why change. I hope she does lose. It would be the biggest slap in the face she's ever had, except for the tryst with Monica. She's a stand by your man idiot.
(4)
(0)
(2)
(0)
7
6
1
This is expected from this unpatriotic unAmerican POS... Didn't need to sit down on this... I think everyone knew this all along
(7)
(1)
5
5
0
SFC (Join to see)
States rights to their own land and the ability to make their own decisions regarding that land is a bad thing? I guess that whole idea of self governance is suddenly a bad thing?
(0)
(0)
SFC (Join to see)
And since we're talking about how wrong liberal policies are, I feel it's only fair to quote Reagan, it's not your fault. "It isn't so much that liberals are ignorant. It's just that they know so many things that aren't so." - President Ronald Reagan.
I don't blame you, you just don't yet know how wrong you are.
I don't blame you, you just don't yet know how wrong you are.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google