Posted on Mar 21, 2014
MSG Career Counselor
3.1K
5
4
1
1
0
Looking at the upcoming changes to AR 670-1, there is a tattoo rule that is more restrictive for Officers than it is for Enlisted.  Does anyone know the reason behind this?
Posted in these groups: Tattoo logo Tattoos454274742x356 DA Pam 670-1
Avatar feed
Responses: 4
CPT All Source Intelligence
2
2
0
The tattoo prejudice is well ingrained at the officer level.  Don't be fooled.  It is very easy to shuffle officers around without having to ever give an explanation; as an LT you end up not getting a platoon, as a CPT you get buried in the 3-shop.  There is no need to cause an uproar by kicking officers out.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Detailed Recruiter
2
2
0
My first thoughts when I also read this MSG...............................The Army is now going to hold officers to higher standards then NCO's and Soldiers. Follow on thoughts were; the Army's also trying to make this an "officer lead" force. I think it's BS myself, but I won't complain too much, I'm trying to do my 20.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
WO1 Special Agent
0
0
0
My question related to this is, Are we going to start dropping officers with sleeves now? Would only be fair right?
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close