Posted on Aug 6, 2015
SGT Jeremiah B.
5.88K
25
10
3
3
0
7fec4b14
When our own NATO allies can't be trusted to not attack the only dependable fighting force in the conflict, can we actually trust that our own contributions are going to be worthwhile?

From the Article (since preview can't be edited and NYT comes through like crap) -

"Now a sharp critic of Mr. Erdogan, Mr. Kiniklioglu said, “I think there is little debate among normal and sane people in Turkey” that the war with the Kurds is being used as a tool to reverse the election defeat. The Justice and Development Party, known as the A.K.P., recently began conducting nationwide polls to see how it might fare in snap elections, which could be held as soon as November."
Posted in these groups: 36e54fb9 TurkeyNATOIsis logo ISIS
Avatar feed
Responses: 5
Maj Mike Sciales
5
5
0
We need to understand that those nations live there. They understand their neighborhoods. We need to respect their decisions, they are our friends, not our tools. The Turks are a professional military more than up to the task of dispatching Daesh. They will also take any opportunity to maintain/improve their position with the Kurds who are likewise watching for Turkish weakness to exploit while they battle Daesh in their area. We like the Kurds, we like the Turks. We can custom tailor our levels of indirect support, but these little fires have to burn. Just the way it is.
(5)
Comment
(0)
SGT Jeremiah B.
SGT Jeremiah B.
10 y
I think you're right, but if there's anything I've learned in this - none of the local actors care enough to commit to the problem (except Iran). Left to their own devices, I think most of them would let Daesh do what it wants until it consumes Syria and Iraq. From a US policy perspective, that seems to be a giant problem since we can't fix the problem without them.

Interestingly, much of Turkey's problem with the PKK evaporated with the advent of the Kurdish autonomous region in Iraq. They seem, at least in the short term, to have a place to call their own.
(2)
Reply
(0)
COL Ted Mc
COL Ted Mc
10 y
SGT Jeremiah B. - If the Kurds would abandon all claim to land inside Turkey's legal borders, I suspect that the Turks would do two things almost instantly:

[1] assist the Kurds to acquire an equivalent amount of land elsewhere, and

[2] pay the freight for moving (and re-establishing) every single Kurd out of Turkey and into Kurdistan.

Since the Kurds are (primarily) Sunni, they should be able to fit in quite nicely in those parts of Iraq and Syria that ISIS is currently occupying.

I suspect that the Kurds would see the wisdom of trading a part of their "traditional lands" (which they have never actually held sovereignty over) for a chunk of actual real estate that would be a real country - especially if someone else is helping to pay the bills for doing so.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Stephen F.
5
5
0
Sad, but not surprising SGT Jeremiah B..
Turks generally have looked out for their own since they were established in the 10th or 11th centuries. As their empire expanded voluntarily and contracted involuntarily after they lost conflicts, they focused on saving their people and what was important to them. They viewed the Armenians as a tool of their enemies and a thorn in their side and did their best to annihilate them during WWI. They have worked to extinguish the Kurds as a people and made it illegal to speak or write Kurdish until August 2002 and has been strongly opposed to the establish of Kurdistan as a nation.
http://www.culturalsurvival.org/publications/cultural-survival-quarterly/turkey/speaking-kurdish-turkey
(5)
Comment
(0)
SGT Jeremiah B.
SGT Jeremiah B.
10 y
LTC Stephen F., Turkey has always been problematic when it comes to minorities, but this seems to cross into actively opposing the 'war effort' ongoing against Daesh. We NEED the Kurds to hold the line and keep them contained. They're the only ground force we can actually depend on.

It seems that at some point, we're going to have to pick a side and that's not going to be pretty.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGM Senior Adviser, National Communications
2
2
0
Until recently, Turkey seems to have been a strong NATO Ally. We knew some time ago that supporting one faction of Kurds might someday lead to a conflict of interest with Turkey. Watch closely to see how it is handled, for we have made mistakes in the past with groups aligned with us. Whether or not the current move by Mr E is political is difficult for us to say with certainty from a distance. Media reports alone are not reliable. Social Media is not reliable nor often credible. It does appear to be an appalling situation, but we certainly do not have all the facts. The northern Kurds have been our Ally for several years. Turkey has been our Ally much longer. Northern Kurds seem to have established a more secure area than any other in the region. Turkey has long muttered about it. Turkey is in a unique position to do much good. Let's see if they will do it.
(2)
Comment
(0)
SGT Jeremiah B.
SGT Jeremiah B.
10 y
I've been watching the Kurdish issues for a while now, both through media and talking to vets that actually served side by side with them in the GWOT. By all reports, the Kurds have proven quite adept at creating a reqion that was stable, accepting of minorities and largely free of insurgent activity. Faced with Daesh, they've fought like hell.

Turkey, on the other hand, has proven less than dependable and has a long track record of horrifying conduct towards minorities. They also seem to have become increasing autocratic under Erdogan.

I HOPE Turkey comes to see the value in a Kurdish state along their border, but somehow I think they're going to screw everything up and force the Kurds to consider the current conflict a two-front war.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close