SGM Matthew Quick 18700 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><p style="padding-bottom:10px;color:rgb(75, 73, 66);font-family:'Lucida Grande' , Tahoma , Verdana , Arial , Helvetica , sans-serif;line-height:22px;">Long overdue?<br><br>Consensual sodomy would no longer be a crime under the Uniform Code of Military Justice under a provision of a compromise defense bill agreed to by the leaders of the House and Senate Armed Services Committee.<br><br>The provision modifies Article 125 of the UCMJ so that bestiality and forcible sodomy remain a military criminal offense but consensual sodomy is not.<br><br>Under current law, the maximum punishment for consensual sodomy is a dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances and five years’ confinement.<br><br>Maximum punishment for forcible sodomy or for sodomy with a child under age 12 is life imprisonment without the eligibility of parole. Sodomy with a child under the age of 16 but older than 12 is 20 years confinement. These maximum punishments would not change under the defense bill provision.</p> ABOUT TIME! Defense Bill Decriminalizes Sodomy 2013-12-10T21:41:20-05:00 SGM Matthew Quick 18700 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><p style="padding-bottom:10px;color:rgb(75, 73, 66);font-family:'Lucida Grande' , Tahoma , Verdana , Arial , Helvetica , sans-serif;line-height:22px;">Long overdue?<br><br>Consensual sodomy would no longer be a crime under the Uniform Code of Military Justice under a provision of a compromise defense bill agreed to by the leaders of the House and Senate Armed Services Committee.<br><br>The provision modifies Article 125 of the UCMJ so that bestiality and forcible sodomy remain a military criminal offense but consensual sodomy is not.<br><br>Under current law, the maximum punishment for consensual sodomy is a dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances and five years’ confinement.<br><br>Maximum punishment for forcible sodomy or for sodomy with a child under age 12 is life imprisonment without the eligibility of parole. Sodomy with a child under the age of 16 but older than 12 is 20 years confinement. These maximum punishments would not change under the defense bill provision.</p> ABOUT TIME! Defense Bill Decriminalizes Sodomy 2013-12-10T21:41:20-05:00 2013-12-10T21:41:20-05:00 LTC Private RallyPoint Member 18706 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Long overdue? Yes Response by LTC Private RallyPoint Member made Dec 10 at 2013 9:50 PM 2013-12-10T21:50:49-05:00 2013-12-10T21:50:49-05:00 SGM Matthew Quick 18711 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I think it&#39;s a shame that this was finally decriminalized ONLY AFTER DOMA was abolished.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#39;m for complete equality, but once again, it&#39;s seems rules are changed for a minority.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Perception is reality. Response by SGM Matthew Quick made Dec 10 at 2013 10:04 PM 2013-12-10T22:04:22-05:00 2013-12-10T22:04:22-05:00 LTC Private RallyPoint Member 18732 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Consensual sodomy all around! Response by LTC Private RallyPoint Member made Dec 10 at 2013 11:04 PM 2013-12-10T23:04:20-05:00 2013-12-10T23:04:20-05:00 1SG(P) Private RallyPoint Member 18764 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>As an Infantry Squad Leader I doggedly pursued UCMJ action against all of my soldiers who engaged in or received oral sex (look up the definition of sodomy).&amp;nbsp; If there&#39;s one thing I wouldn&#39;t stand for, it&#39;s a rifleman who would turn his back on the good order and discipline provided by the UCMJ just for some slap and tickle!&lt;br&gt; Response by 1SG(P) Private RallyPoint Member made Dec 11 at 2013 12:27 AM 2013-12-11T00:27:52-05:00 2013-12-11T00:27:52-05:00 MSG Private RallyPoint Member 19183 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Consensual sodomy... Who stopped and thought about UCMJ?    Response by MSG Private RallyPoint Member made Dec 11 at 2013 10:13 PM 2013-12-11T22:13:44-05:00 2013-12-11T22:13:44-05:00 SPC David Hannaman 811304 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Considering the actual definition of Sodomy:<br />"sexual intercourse involving anal or ORAL copulation"<br /><br />I don't know if UCMJ makes a distinction of gender, but assuming it doesn't I'm guessing you'd be hard pressed to find anyone who is qualified to "throw the first stone".<br /><br />Stupid law to begin with. Response by SPC David Hannaman made Jul 13 at 2015 11:53 AM 2015-07-13T11:53:34-04:00 2015-07-13T11:53:34-04:00 2013-12-10T21:41:20-05:00