SGM Matthew Quick18700<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><p style="padding-bottom:10px;color:rgb(75, 73, 66);font-family:'Lucida Grande' , Tahoma , Verdana , Arial , Helvetica , sans-serif;line-height:22px;">Long overdue?<br><br>Consensual sodomy would no longer be a crime under the Uniform Code of Military Justice under a provision of a compromise defense bill agreed to by the leaders of the House and Senate Armed Services Committee.<br><br>The provision modifies Article 125 of the UCMJ so that bestiality and forcible sodomy remain a military criminal offense but consensual sodomy is not.<br><br>Under current law, the maximum punishment for consensual sodomy is a dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances and five years’ confinement.<br><br>Maximum punishment for forcible sodomy or for sodomy with a child under age 12 is life imprisonment without the eligibility of parole. Sodomy with a child under the age of 16 but older than 12 is 20 years confinement. These maximum punishments would not change under the defense bill provision.</p>ABOUT TIME! Defense Bill Decriminalizes Sodomy2013-12-10T21:41:20-05:00SGM Matthew Quick18700<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><p style="padding-bottom:10px;color:rgb(75, 73, 66);font-family:'Lucida Grande' , Tahoma , Verdana , Arial , Helvetica , sans-serif;line-height:22px;">Long overdue?<br><br>Consensual sodomy would no longer be a crime under the Uniform Code of Military Justice under a provision of a compromise defense bill agreed to by the leaders of the House and Senate Armed Services Committee.<br><br>The provision modifies Article 125 of the UCMJ so that bestiality and forcible sodomy remain a military criminal offense but consensual sodomy is not.<br><br>Under current law, the maximum punishment for consensual sodomy is a dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances and five years’ confinement.<br><br>Maximum punishment for forcible sodomy or for sodomy with a child under age 12 is life imprisonment without the eligibility of parole. Sodomy with a child under the age of 16 but older than 12 is 20 years confinement. These maximum punishments would not change under the defense bill provision.</p>ABOUT TIME! Defense Bill Decriminalizes Sodomy2013-12-10T21:41:20-05:002013-12-10T21:41:20-05:00LTC Private RallyPoint Member18706<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Long overdue? YesResponse by LTC Private RallyPoint Member made Dec 10 at 2013 9:50 PM2013-12-10T21:50:49-05:002013-12-10T21:50:49-05:00SGM Matthew Quick18711<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>I think it's a shame that this was finally decriminalized ONLY AFTER DOMA was abolished.<br><br>I'm for complete equality, but once again, it's seems rules are changed for a minority.<br><br>Perception is reality.Response by SGM Matthew Quick made Dec 10 at 2013 10:04 PM2013-12-10T22:04:22-05:002013-12-10T22:04:22-05:00LTC Private RallyPoint Member18732<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Consensual sodomy all around!Response by LTC Private RallyPoint Member made Dec 10 at 2013 11:04 PM2013-12-10T23:04:20-05:002013-12-10T23:04:20-05:001SG(P) Private RallyPoint Member18764<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>As an Infantry Squad Leader I doggedly pursued UCMJ action against all of my soldiers who engaged in or received oral sex (look up the definition of sodomy).&nbsp; If there's one thing I wouldn't stand for, it's a rifleman who would turn his back on the good order and discipline provided by the UCMJ just for some slap and tickle!<br>Response by 1SG(P) Private RallyPoint Member made Dec 11 at 2013 12:27 AM2013-12-11T00:27:52-05:002013-12-11T00:27:52-05:00MSG Private RallyPoint Member19183<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Consensual sodomy... Who stopped and thought about UCMJ? Response by MSG Private RallyPoint Member made Dec 11 at 2013 10:13 PM2013-12-11T22:13:44-05:002013-12-11T22:13:44-05:00SPC David Hannaman811304<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Considering the actual definition of Sodomy:<br />"sexual intercourse involving anal or ORAL copulation"<br /><br />I don't know if UCMJ makes a distinction of gender, but assuming it doesn't I'm guessing you'd be hard pressed to find anyone who is qualified to "throw the first stone".<br /><br />Stupid law to begin with.Response by SPC David Hannaman made Jul 13 at 2015 11:53 AM2015-07-13T11:53:34-04:002015-07-13T11:53:34-04:002013-12-10T21:41:20-05:00