SFC Stephen King 1154300 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div> Are equal standards required or necessary for combat effectiveness? 2015-12-06T07:24:28-05:00 SFC Stephen King 1154300 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div> Are equal standards required or necessary for combat effectiveness? 2015-12-06T07:24:28-05:00 2015-12-06T07:24:28-05:00 CW4 Private RallyPoint Member 1154319 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Nope. You certainly don't need a 15W to have a 300 PT score to be an effective UAS operator. The moment the Army figures that out, they'll no longer have a retention problem with the highly skilled MOS's. Response by CW4 Private RallyPoint Member made Dec 6 at 2015 7:57 AM 2015-12-06T07:57:18-05:00 2015-12-06T07:57:18-05:00 SSG Kelly Ferguson 1154364 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>The way I see everyone has a job do it to 110% +. Response by SSG Kelly Ferguson made Dec 6 at 2015 8:57 AM 2015-12-06T08:57:12-05:00 2015-12-06T08:57:12-05:00 PVT Robert Gresham 1154373 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>For "esprit de corps" within the ranks it may be a necessary part of the Services, <a class="dark-link bold-link" role="profile-hover" data-qtip-container="body" data-id="618286" data-source-page-controller="question_response_contents" href="/profiles/618286-sfc-stephen-king">SFC Stephen King</a>. How can any Service hold one individual to a high standard when, in the next platoon over, the same standards are not being enforced? Sooner or later someone is going to question why they have to work at fitness, train in the cold, and the rain, when others are allowed to be overweight, and just sit in an office with no training. All Military members should be ready to fight first, and then also be ready to do whatever their MOS/current assignment entails. Failure to do this could result in a totally unprepared unit under attack, in a real world (deployed) situation. Response by PVT Robert Gresham made Dec 6 at 2015 9:02 AM 2015-12-06T09:02:32-05:00 2015-12-06T09:02:32-05:00 CPT Private RallyPoint Member 1154381 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><br />Perhaps it is MOS dependent. Carrying wounded soldiers/stretchers, moving heavy truck tires, carrying 100 pound loads of ammunition, digging expedient fighting positions, repairing track, carrying 5 gallon cans of water or fuel are realities of close combat expectations. There will be women who are able to do these things, let them but let's not lower the expectations for Soldiers in a way that will endanger the lives of team members or disrupt their effectiveness. Response by CPT Private RallyPoint Member made Dec 6 at 2015 9:07 AM 2015-12-06T09:07:37-05:00 2015-12-06T09:07:37-05:00 SFC Stephen King 1154512 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><a target="_blank" href="http://kval.com/news/local/local-female-veterans-react-to-pentagon-news-on-women-in-combat">http://kval.com/news/local/local-female-veterans-react-to-pentagon-news-on-women-in-combat</a> Response by SFC Stephen King made Dec 6 at 2015 10:25 AM 2015-12-06T10:25:34-05:00 2015-12-06T10:25:34-05:00 SSgt Terry P. 1154513 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><a class="dark-link bold-link" role="profile-hover" data-qtip-container="body" data-id="618286" data-source-page-controller="question_response_contents" href="/profiles/618286-sfc-stephen-king">SFC Stephen King</a> Simply put,yes. Response by SSgt Terry P. made Dec 6 at 2015 10:26 AM 2015-12-06T10:26:37-05:00 2015-12-06T10:26:37-05:00 SSG Private RallyPoint Member 1155660 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Why cant we just go to one basic standard and then add to that standard if needed for certan MOS's. Why cant we have one PT standard. Response by SSG Private RallyPoint Member made Dec 6 at 2015 8:00 PM 2015-12-06T20:00:45-05:00 2015-12-06T20:00:45-05:00 2015-12-06T07:24:28-05:00