Posted on Apr 30, 2015
Is 70 personnel enough help from the US to help those in Nepal?
3.82K
4
5
1
1
0
I can't believe that we are only sending 70 personnel so far. Do you think that's enough, or should we send more?
http://time.com/3836657/nepal-us-aid/
http://time.com/3836657/nepal-us-aid/
Foreign Aid
Nepal
Natural Disaster
Posted 10 y ago
Responses: 3
1
1
0
PO2 Skip Kirkwood
I am laughing so hard that I can't type straight, but this is a terrific idea! Perhaps one with political and economic experience!
(0)
(0)
1
1
0
This is embarrassing me. 70? Really? I'm pretty sure you have units in Europe and Southeast Asia (Korea & Japan) from all four branches that can help. Guess we need to wait for someone like ABC, CBS or NBC or better yet, a Presidential candidate (hint hint) to call the President and Congress out.
(1)
(0)
0
0
0
Depends on what those 70 bring. If they fly in and set up a large field hospital and it is going to be staffed by medics from some other country, that's a pretty big deal. What would they call that? Force multiplier?
And I don't think that anybody said that is ALL that we would be sending.
And I don't think that anybody said that is ALL that we would be sending.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google