MSG Morgan Fiszel, CPCM, CFCM 868355 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Can increasing awareness or presence be bad? Can you think of examples where it might be better not to increase awareness? 20 years ago &#39;active shooter&#39; had no meaning. Today the term is all over the place. It&#39;s part of every safety brief and heavily covered by the media. For this very reason I believe there are more instances. Thoughts? 2015-08-05T20:32:06-04:00 MSG Morgan Fiszel, CPCM, CFCM 868355

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>Can increasing awareness or presence be bad? Can you think of examples where it might be better not to increase awareness? 20 years ago &#39;active shooter&#39; had no meaning. Today the term is all over the place. It&#39;s part of every safety brief and heavily covered by the media. For this very reason I believe there are more instances. Thoughts?

2015-08-05T20:32:06-04:00 2015-08-05T20:32:06-04:00 LTC John Shaw 868359

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div><a class="dark-link bold-link" role="profile-hover" data-qtip-container="body" data-id="537597" data-source-page-controller="question_response_contents" href="/profiles/537597-msg-morgan-fiszel-cpcm-cfcm">MSG Morgan Fiszel, CPCM, CFCM</a> Agreed, we just had this conversation on a diff thread. We need to black out the shooters name and not state it. <br />Each shooter we give a different alias and refer the idiot as dummy or person X.<br />If we stop giving credit the desire for infamy may start to wane.

2015-08-05T20:33:18-04:00 2015-08-05T20:33:18-04:00 2015-08-05T20:32:06-04:00