Navy Times402497<div class="images-v2-count-1"><div class="content-picture image-v2-number-1" id="image-18653"> <div class="social_icons social-buttons-on-image">
<a href='https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rallypoint.com%2Fanswers%2Fnavy-considers-more-sonobuoys-off-pacific-coast%3Futm_source%3DFacebook%26utm_medium%3Dorganic%26utm_campaign%3DShare%20to%20facebook'
target="_blank" class='social-share-button facebook-share-button'><i class="fa fa-facebook-f"></i></a>
<a href="https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Navy+considers+more+sonobuoys+off+Pacific+Coast&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rallypoint.com%2Fanswers%2Fnavy-considers-more-sonobuoys-off-pacific-coast&via=RallyPoint"
target="_blank" class="social-share-button twitter-custom-share-button"><i class="fa fa-twitter"></i></a>
<a href="mailto:?subject=Check this out on RallyPoint!&body=Hi, I thought you would find this interesting:%0D%0ANavy considers more sonobuoys off Pacific Coast%0D%0A %0D%0AHere is the link: https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/navy-considers-more-sonobuoys-off-pacific-coast"
target="_blank" class="social-share-button email-share-button"><i class="fa fa-envelope"></i></a>
</div>
<a class="fancybox" rel="81db900297309332e9fc392b5672c3f7" href="https://d1ndsj6b8hkqu9.cloudfront.net/pictures/images/000/018/653/for_gallery_v2/635559763062710378-6100374230-97c55055fd-b.jpg"><img src="https://d1ndsj6b8hkqu9.cloudfront.net/pictures/images/000/018/653/large_v3/635559763062710378-6100374230-97c55055fd-b.jpg" alt="635559763062710378 6100374230 97c55055fd b" /></a></div></div>From: Navy Times<br /><br />PORTLAND, Ore. — The Navy could significantly increase the number of sonobuoys it plans to deploy off the Pacific Coast.<br /><br />The floating, acoustic surveillance devices are used in anti-submarine warfare. The Oregonian reports that in a modified environmental assessment for Northwest training and testing, the Navy increased the number of planned sonobuoys from 20 to 720.<br /><br />They would be in areas at least 12 miles offshore from Alaska, Washington, Oregon and Northern California.<br /><br />The Navy acknowledges that deploying more of them is likely to harm endangered leatherneck turtles. It's accepting public comments until Feb. 2.<br /><br />In addition to more buoys, the document also details additional "maritime security operations" that weren't reviewed in the earlier environmental assessment, possibly including escorts for submarines, search-and-seizure exercises, and anti-piracy missions.<br /><br /><a target="_blank" href="http://www.navytimes.com/story/military/tech/2015/01/04/navy-considers-more-sonobuoys-off-pacific-coast/21259539/">http://www.navytimes.com/story/military/tech/2015/01/04/navy-considers-more-sonobuoys-off-pacific-coast/21259539/</a>Navy considers more sonobuoys off Pacific Coast2015-01-05T09:22:17-05:00Navy Times402497<div class="images-v2-count-1"><div class="content-picture image-v2-number-1" id="image-18653"> <div class="social_icons social-buttons-on-image">
<a href='https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rallypoint.com%2Fanswers%2Fnavy-considers-more-sonobuoys-off-pacific-coast%3Futm_source%3DFacebook%26utm_medium%3Dorganic%26utm_campaign%3DShare%20to%20facebook'
target="_blank" class='social-share-button facebook-share-button'><i class="fa fa-facebook-f"></i></a>
<a href="https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Navy+considers+more+sonobuoys+off+Pacific+Coast&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rallypoint.com%2Fanswers%2Fnavy-considers-more-sonobuoys-off-pacific-coast&via=RallyPoint"
target="_blank" class="social-share-button twitter-custom-share-button"><i class="fa fa-twitter"></i></a>
<a href="mailto:?subject=Check this out on RallyPoint!&body=Hi, I thought you would find this interesting:%0D%0ANavy considers more sonobuoys off Pacific Coast%0D%0A %0D%0AHere is the link: https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/navy-considers-more-sonobuoys-off-pacific-coast"
target="_blank" class="social-share-button email-share-button"><i class="fa fa-envelope"></i></a>
</div>
<a class="fancybox" rel="e5c019e73e2135a5df522bd86da7f6f5" href="https://d1ndsj6b8hkqu9.cloudfront.net/pictures/images/000/018/653/for_gallery_v2/635559763062710378-6100374230-97c55055fd-b.jpg"><img src="https://d1ndsj6b8hkqu9.cloudfront.net/pictures/images/000/018/653/large_v3/635559763062710378-6100374230-97c55055fd-b.jpg" alt="635559763062710378 6100374230 97c55055fd b" /></a></div></div>From: Navy Times<br /><br />PORTLAND, Ore. — The Navy could significantly increase the number of sonobuoys it plans to deploy off the Pacific Coast.<br /><br />The floating, acoustic surveillance devices are used in anti-submarine warfare. The Oregonian reports that in a modified environmental assessment for Northwest training and testing, the Navy increased the number of planned sonobuoys from 20 to 720.<br /><br />They would be in areas at least 12 miles offshore from Alaska, Washington, Oregon and Northern California.<br /><br />The Navy acknowledges that deploying more of them is likely to harm endangered leatherneck turtles. It's accepting public comments until Feb. 2.<br /><br />In addition to more buoys, the document also details additional "maritime security operations" that weren't reviewed in the earlier environmental assessment, possibly including escorts for submarines, search-and-seizure exercises, and anti-piracy missions.<br /><br /><a target="_blank" href="http://www.navytimes.com/story/military/tech/2015/01/04/navy-considers-more-sonobuoys-off-pacific-coast/21259539/">http://www.navytimes.com/story/military/tech/2015/01/04/navy-considers-more-sonobuoys-off-pacific-coast/21259539/</a>Navy considers more sonobuoys off Pacific Coast2015-01-05T09:22:17-05:002015-01-05T09:22:17-05:00CW5 Private RallyPoint Member402663<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>This might sound like I'm being a smart aleck, but is it the actual deployment of the sonobuoys (launching/dropping them into the water) that "is likely to harm endangered leatherneck turtles"? If that's not it, I don't get how buoys floating in the water damages turtles. Anyone else wonder about this?Response by CW5 Private RallyPoint Member made Jan 5 at 2015 11:33 AM2015-01-05T11:33:29-05:002015-01-05T11:33:29-05:00PO1 Donald Hammond402673<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>yeh yeh. They never did find us. We had to make noise for them to find us.Response by PO1 Donald Hammond made Jan 5 at 2015 11:37 AM2015-01-05T11:37:58-05:002015-01-05T11:37:58-05:00Capt Walter Miller1298173<div class="images-v2-count-1"><div class="content-picture image-v2-number-1" id="image-79068"> <div class="social_icons social-buttons-on-image">
<a href='https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rallypoint.com%2Fanswers%2Fnavy-considers-more-sonobuoys-off-pacific-coast%3Futm_source%3DFacebook%26utm_medium%3Dorganic%26utm_campaign%3DShare%20to%20facebook'
target="_blank" class='social-share-button facebook-share-button'><i class="fa fa-facebook-f"></i></a>
<a href="https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Navy+considers+more+sonobuoys+off+Pacific+Coast&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rallypoint.com%2Fanswers%2Fnavy-considers-more-sonobuoys-off-pacific-coast&via=RallyPoint"
target="_blank" class="social-share-button twitter-custom-share-button"><i class="fa fa-twitter"></i></a>
<a href="mailto:?subject=Check this out on RallyPoint!&body=Hi, I thought you would find this interesting:%0D%0ANavy considers more sonobuoys off Pacific Coast%0D%0A %0D%0AHere is the link: https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/navy-considers-more-sonobuoys-off-pacific-coast"
target="_blank" class="social-share-button email-share-button"><i class="fa fa-envelope"></i></a>
</div>
<a class="fancybox" rel="ab6f701ad8c53a74be86c1be853625a7" href="https://d1ndsj6b8hkqu9.cloudfront.net/pictures/images/000/079/068/for_gallery_v2/887c2764.jpg"><img src="https://d1ndsj6b8hkqu9.cloudfront.net/pictures/images/000/079/068/large_v3/887c2764.jpg" alt="887c2764" /></a></div></div>Response by Capt Walter Miller made Feb 12 at 2016 2:28 PM2016-02-12T14:28:13-05:002016-02-12T14:28:13-05:002015-01-05T09:22:17-05:00