President Obama suggests "FORCED VOTING" for Americans... how does THAT grab you?

Cpl Anthony Pearson — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:19:06 -0400

So, our illustrious president has suggested "forced voting" for Americans. How do YOU feel about that? Being FORCED to vote for candidates you may or may not support?

I understand Americans should vote. No question about that. But FORCED?

Smells like communism. Socialism. Doesn't smell American at all.

obama force voting - Google Search

Response by Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS made Mar 18 at 2015 8:18 PM

Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS — Wed, 18 Mar 2015 20:18:51 -0400

Having a Right, includes the option to not use it.

As an example, we have the Right to bear arms. If someone floated the idea of making it mandatory, 50% of the room would lose their mind. How is voting different?

Response by CPT Zachary Brooks made Mar 18 at 2015 8:28 PM

CPT Zachary Brooks — Wed, 18 Mar 2015 20:28:28 -0400

As has been mentioned, your right to not vote must also be decided. Mandating individual choices makes us all less free.

This is just waiting for corruption to set in and having people voting that never showed up at the polls.

I MIGHT be interested in this if there is a "None of the above" option and it is automatically selected if you do not show up to vote.

Response by SFC Michael Hasbun made Mar 19 at 2015 11:16 AM

SFC Michael Hasbun — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:16:20 -0400

If this upsets anyone, I would think they should be more upset that voter turnout and civic responsibility is so poor that this discussion is even on the table..

Response by Col Joseph Lenertz made Mar 19 at 2015 11:22 AM

Col Joseph Lenertz — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:22:48 -0400

Every government global mandate (all must do) reduces individual liberty and sets the government over the people. We The People decide. Making voting a government mandate turns the concept of People over Government on its head. A terrible precedent and large step away from constitutional principles.

Response by SFC Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 19 at 2015 11:23 AM

SFC Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:23:03 -0400

It funny how conveniently he suggest this immidiately after the amnesty brought in millions more democratic "voters".

Response by CPT Zachary Brooks made Mar 19 at 2015 11:25 AM

CPT Zachary Brooks — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:25:11 -0400

Well let's see here:

1. Takes away people's freedom by removing their choice
2. Reeks of corruption opportunities
3. Still only stuck with two crappy options, would love to see "None of the above"
4. How will this be enforced? Or will your vote just register for the party in power automatically?

Response by SSgt June Worden made Mar 19 at 2015 11:25 AM

SSgt June Worden — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:25:25 -0400

My question would be... What are the consequences for those that refuse? Let's be clear, I vote in each election, be it local, state or federal. As an American that is my right and responsibility. I also believe that all citizens should vote, however, I'm vehemently opposed to forcing the issue!!!

Response by Cpl Anthony Pearson made Mar 19 at 2015 11:25 AM

Cpl Anthony Pearson — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:25:31 -0400

King Obama.

Response by SFC Michael Hasbun made Mar 19 at 2015 11:26 AM

SFC Michael Hasbun — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:26:17 -0400

Shame Americans would even HAVE to be forced to vote...

Response by Col Joseph Lenertz made Mar 19 at 2015 11:35 AM

Col Joseph Lenertz — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:35:45 -0400

When government laws mandate citizen's activity (whether voting or buying health insurance), individual liberty is lost. It says, "we the government are above The People. We know better and can order under force of punishment ALL the citizens what to do." These laws turn the concept of people over government (of the people, for the people, by the people) on it's head.
That is why so many are against the health insurance mandate and will be against this proposal. If only subconsciously, Americans have a sense of our constitutional principles even if they haven't studied the constitution. And no progressive interpretation will take away that bad feeling they have. They sense a loss of liberty...and they are correct.

Response by SFC Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 19 at 2015 11:37 AM

SFC Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:37:12 -0400

I wished all Americans would become educated on who and what is on the ballets and vote their conscious. The key to this is "Educated Voters"; without the educated part it would be no better than what already happens...someone gets elected not on proven ability to lead or deal with the ability deal with the issues facing the nation; but instead on radical promises and free handouts.

Response by PV2 Alaina Norman made Mar 19 at 2015 11:38 AM

PV2 Alaina Norman — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:38:29 -0400

obama likes to force a lot of stuff on Americans like healthcare system and telling us if you don't take it i will charge you a fine. I understand people need healthcare or should vote because its the American way but we also have the right to choose. You cant force something upon someone. All this does it makes me want to go against him even more. I want to vote because i want a good leader and changes to happen, not because he said I have to or else

Response by MAJ Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 19 at 2015 11:56 AM

MAJ Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:56:02 -0400

I lived in Brazil for years where voting is mandatory, it is a horrible idea. No one really cares about politics so they just vote for the first person on the ballot, the vast majority of elected officials have A-D's in their last names.

A local election was won by a lady named anajulia, who won in the largest landslide in the state's history after a very popular song came out called anajulia. She had no political experience.

In the 2012 election there were 15 candidates who changed their names to Obama.
(he's popular down there, as are the pro communist militarists)

If people don't care enough about elections to get their ***'s to the mailbox to cast a ballot they certainly won't do enough research to actually figure out who to vote for.

My belief is this is one of the major problems with corruption in Latin America. Of course it's clear to see why mandatory votes would be great for the democratic party and why they consider it to be "transformative." Particularly after the latest election when republicans came out in mass and democrats stayed home.

Response by SGT Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 19 at 2015 12:24 PM

SGT Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 12:24:19 -0400

Get the illegals in line! I mean seriously!! This is becoming more and more of a dictatorship. I wanna scream

Response by Sgt Cody Dumont made Mar 19 at 2015 12:44 PM

Sgt Cody Dumont — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 12:44:06 -0400

It's not making voting mandatory that scares me, but how would be enforced and what would the consequences. Freedom is the right to choose, not force to choose.

Response by SGM Erik Marquez made Mar 19 at 2015 12:52 PM

SGM Erik Marquez — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 12:52:02 -0400

ahh, no thank you

Response by PO3 Steven Sherrill made Mar 19 at 2015 1:01 PM

PO3 Steven Sherrill — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 13:01:15 -0400

Forced Voting is an oxymoron. In the "free" nation we live in voting is a privilege, a right, a choice, a responsibility, and yes a duty. It is the same duty that every service member entered when they took their oath joining the armed forces. It is not a duty that is pushed upon the individual, but the voice of the people in our system.

What I really want is choices aside from greedy bastard D and greedy bastard R. If the people had candidates that actually believed as they do, then maybe they would be more willing to get out and vote. When you see that Washington has become so bogged down in its own slime that nothing good is coming out of it, there is no incentive to vote. I know that there are third party candidates, but they are muted by the two major parties into obscurity. Last election, I was told that voting for a third party candidate was wasting my vote. I couldn't disagree more. Voting for a candidate whom is not worthy of your vote is wasting your vote.

The election process is broken. In my humble opinion, electoral votes should be divided according to percentages. If you get ten percent of the popular vote in a state, you get ten percent of the electoral votes. Additionally, I think that political parties should be disbanded all together. Let a candidate run based on their ideals, not a letter that appears after their name.

Finally I think that we need to ban corporate sponsorship of candidates through campaign funds. Level the playing field. If a candidate is on the ballot, then they should be heard in the debates. Tax breaks to the networks for broadcasting a candidates message provided that that they provide equal air time for each candidate. No more lies about the lies the other guy is spewing. Let the candidates run on their merits rather than the demerits of the opponent. I am gauging your ability to do the job, not your opponents inability to do the job. Don't hand me to shit sandwiches one with mayo and one with mustard then ask me to choose which is better.

Sorry for the rant, but this is a subject that really bothers me.

Response by MAJ Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 19 at 2015 1:05 PM

MAJ Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 13:05:23 -0400

Copied from the Mandatory Voting in the US Post.

I lived in Brazil for years where voting is mandatory, it is a horrible idea. No one really cares about politics so they just vote for the first person on the ballot, the vast majority of elected officials have A-D's in their last names.

A local election was won by a lady named anajulia, who won in the largest landslide in the state's history after a very popular song came out called anajulia. She had no political experience.

In the 2012 election there were 15 candidates who changed their names to Obama.
(he's popular down there, as are the pro communist militarists)

If people don't care enough about elections to get their ***'s to the mailbox to cast a ballot they certainly won't do enough research to actually figure out who to vote for.

My belief is this is one of the major problems with corruption in Latin America. Of course it's clear to see why mandatory votes would be great for the democratic party and why they consider it to be "transformative." Particularly after the latest election when republicans came out in mass and democrats stayed home.

Response by SGT Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 19 at 2015 1:05 PM

SGT Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 13:05:33 -0400

I am more of the mind of Service to the State/Country before you can vote. If you have no stake or appreciation for what you have it's a lot easier to vote for the guy with the flashiest logo or sound bite.

Response by SGT Dylan Epp made Mar 19 at 2015 1:11 PM

SGT Dylan Epp — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 13:11:52 -0400

It's a very slippery slop for sure...I'm not happy with even the thought of this!

Response by COL Jean (John) F. B. made Mar 19 at 2015 1:14 PM

COL Jean (John) F. B. — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 13:14:24 -0400

Voting is a privilege and a right, however, it is not, nor it should be, a requirement.

The only reason this idiotic idea has even come up is that Obama and his cronies think it will ensure more low-information voters will vote Democrat.

Response by SPC Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 19 at 2015 1:30 PM

SPC Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 13:30:38 -0400

it just goes to show you that this man does not care about the Constitution he wants to be king he makes all the rules so the people will obey Him and worship Him well we got less than 2 years and this man will be gone unless he declares himself king god help us

Response by LTC Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 19 at 2015 1:39 PM

LTC Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 13:39:31 -0400

Does this NOT bother the American People? I was astonished at the Affordable Care Act, as well as the Patriot Act and thought the back lash would right the madness... WOW!

Response by SFC Charles S. made Mar 19 at 2015 1:43 PM

SFC Charles S. — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 13:43:20 -0400

We will end up looking like Brazil. Watch this John Oliver Clip about Brazil Compulsory voting.

https://youtu.be/-n6hvPP06Rs

John Oliver - Brazil's Joke Candidates

From HBO's Last Week Tonight with John Oliver. All rights belong to HBO. Check out the official channel here: https://www.youtube.com/user/LastWeekTonight

Response by PO1 Stephen Caldonetti made Mar 19 at 2015 2:35 PM

PO1 Stephen Caldonetti — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 14:35:10 -0400

This is Un-American. I served in the military to protect people's rights. The right to vote means that you don't have to if you don't want to. I always encourage voting, be at the end of the day, the individual can choose to not vote.

Response by SGT James Hunsinger made Mar 19 at 2015 2:39 PM

SGT James Hunsinger — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 14:39:51 -0400

I have come to the conclusion that this president and his administration have a mission to do everything in their power to circumvent our constitution and destroy the very foundations our country is based upon. I will be much happier when this man's regime ends and hopefully we get someone who actually cares about this country and its longevity into the Oval Office.

Freedom includes the freedom or right to NOT vote if you so choose. We are headed into a police state. America better wake up before it is too late!

Response by TSgt Kevin Buccola made Mar 19 at 2015 2:44 PM

TSgt Kevin Buccola — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 14:44:51 -0400

Forcing a "Right"...hmmm It is our Right to Vote to force it is ridiculous but then again does any of this surprise anyone.

I would like to see a easier way to vote - why can't we vote from home using a "PIV or Secure card" Why can't we vote at libraries etc. Why must we have to go to a Voting location. To show an ID? most don't even check - they just have you sign in...some say that voting on-line is not "hack proof" Working with polls is not hack proof either - many polling people voted numerous times for people that never showed up or had deceased but still on the register.

Response by 1SG Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 19 at 2015 3:01 PM

1SG Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 15:01:34 -0400

http://reason.com/blog/2015/03/19/mandatory-voting-is-a-terribleand-insult

Mandatory Voting Is a Terrible—And Insulting—Idea

The political parties have no right to demand our stamp of approval for their elections.

Response by CSM David Heidke made Mar 19 at 2015 3:01 PM

CSM David Heidke — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 15:01:56 -0400

I'd rather see forced working

Response by SSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 19 at 2015 3:05 PM

SSgt Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 15:05:02 -0400

Voting is a right and shouldn't be mandated.

Response by SSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 19 at 2015 3:06 PM

SSgt Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 15:06:43 -0400

You can't mandate what a citizen does and still call this a "free" country.

Response by LTC Herman Valentine made Mar 19 at 2015 3:41 PM

LTC Herman Valentine — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 15:41:18 -0400

Voting is a privilege, not a right or a coerced event! Only a despotic wannabe dictator would even consider making voting mandatory! The fact that he articulated this idea using his "outside voice" is truly disturbing!

Response by PO1 Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 19 at 2015 3:50 PM

PO1 Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 15:50:57 -0400

I always say, "Power of the write-in vote. Don't like the current selection....make your own..."

Response by CSM Michael J. Uhlig made Mar 19 at 2015 4:09 PM

CSM Michael J. Uhlig — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 16:09:14 -0400

There was a discussion on this topic and one senior was very vocal supporting the idea that only veterans and tax payers should be allowed to vote....I know how the discussion went, but an curious as to your thoughts - should only veterans and tax payers earn the right to vote/make the decision of our elected representation?

Response by SPC Lee Burner made Mar 19 at 2015 4:39 PM

SPC Lee Burner — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 16:39:38 -0400

And by Americans he means all illegal immigrants he gives amnesty

Response by SGT Bryon Sergent made Mar 19 at 2015 5:57 PM

SGT Bryon Sergent — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 17:57:22 -0400

He is the POTUS so I have to by Regulation be Civil and hold my tongue! But all I c an say is hopefully not in my life time, we should be able to vote this guy out if we don't like him during his term and put in an interim till the election can run.

Response by SFC Collin McMillion made Mar 19 at 2015 6:01 PM

SFC Collin McMillion — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 18:01:36 -0400

You have to be kidding me, will there still be write-in votes. What next????!!!!

Response by SPC Christopher Smith made Mar 19 at 2015 6:59 PM

SPC Christopher Smith — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 18:59:38 -0400

It is my right as an American to vote, or not to vote. Unless everyone is at gun point, I don't see how you would control the masses to force them to do anything.

Response by Capt Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 19 at 2015 7:02 PM

Capt Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 19:02:58 -0400

I think it's crap. I don't believe in mandatory voting, health insurance, seatbelts, helmets or other behaviors. Should you do those things? Yes. Should you be made to? No.

Response by SGT Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 19 at 2015 7:42 PM

SGT Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 19:42:12 -0400

Well considering America has already become an Oligarchy in favor of elitist law making, in particular for some socialist utopian fantasy land that will never exist. It does not surprise me one bit that this has come out of his filthy hole(s).

Response by SGT Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 19 at 2015 8:03 PM

SGT Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 20:03:42 -0400

I wouldent vote down on this topic because it wasent put that way in the speech it was stated in other countries how they vote and predicted events that mite have if we had to do it this way not saying maby its time we did or we should

Response by SGT Jim Z. made Mar 19 at 2015 8:28 PM

SGT Jim Z. — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 20:28:16 -0400

While I agree more Americans should vote it is their right to vote or not. I do not agree with his "forced" voting and ask Australia comment, once again I think he is trying to trounce the US Constitution.

Response by SPC Patrick Gearardo made Mar 19 at 2015 8:43 PM

SPC Patrick Gearardo — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 20:43:42 -0400

What should be approved is ANY person wanting to run for President should have served in the U.S. Military. Goes for ANY politician as well.

Response by SPC Lee Burner made Mar 19 at 2015 8:48 PM

SPC Lee Burner — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 20:48:54 -0400

By Americans I think he means illegal Immigrants with amnesty.

Response by Cpl Tare Weston made Mar 19 at 2015 8:55 PM

Cpl Tare Weston — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 20:55:11 -0400

Maybe that would be better than gerrymandering and closing polling places, or moving polling places without notice to satisfy certain parties interests!

Response by PO1 Jason Taylor made Mar 19 at 2015 9:08 PM

PO1 Jason Taylor — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 21:08:05 -0400

Like South Park stated its always between a giant d and a turd sandwich. If I don't like there candidate I should not be forced to vote! The last good president we had was Reagan! When another good one shows up let me know and I'll vote! Until then they can bicker and argue amongst themselves on what is better between a giant d and a turd sandwich, I personally don't like ether and will not vote!

Response by SGT Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 19 at 2015 9:09 PM

SGT Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 21:09:02 -0400

I'm stocking up on as much ammo as possible! If and when there is a complete government takeover in my lifetime, I will have no qualms about going down in a blaze of glory protecting my belief that all should live free from tyranny.

Response by CPL Jesse Vasconcelos made Mar 19 at 2015 10:00 PM

CPL Jesse Vasconcelos — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 22:00:47 -0400

Voting is one of the most important right we have as a citizen. But it's a right and should be up to the citizen. All though every American should be required it still should be upto them as we live in a free country. The must be required to vote atleast once in their life to show the are true to this Country and its constitution.

Response by SGM Mikel Dawson made Mar 19 at 2015 10:24 PM

SGM Mikel Dawson — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 22:24:39 -0400

If those running for office were worth voting for, more people would turn out to vote. But what people see is just the same old thing from two different parties who in reality are just the same.

Response by SFC(P) Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 19 at 2015 10:25 PM

SFC(P) Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 22:25:05 -0400

Sigh... is all I got.

Response by AN Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 20 at 2015 12:41 AM

AN Private RallyPoint Member — Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:41:18 -0400

why not.

Response by SGT Tyler G. made Mar 20 at 2015 5:26 AM

SGT Tyler G. — Fri, 20 Mar 2015 05:26:59 -0400

This sounds more like rhetoric to drive home the issue of how less than a third of the U.S. populace votes, than an actual suggestion of policy. And it's an issue that does need to be addressed.

Response by SP5 Joel O'Brien made Mar 20 at 2015 8:39 AM

SP5 Joel O'Brien — Fri, 20 Mar 2015 08:39:36 -0400

It's a suggestion. Nothing more. I put this on par with asking a disc jockey to play a 'request.'

Response by Cpl Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 20 at 2015 10:21 AM

Cpl Private RallyPoint Member — Fri, 20 Mar 2015 10:21:06 -0400

If this was to happen, I could see them trying to remove the electorate as well. When the mob ruled, Rome burned!

The key difference between a democracy and a republic lies in the limits placed on government by the law, which has implications for minority rights. Both forms of government tend to use a representational system where citizens vote to elect politicians to represent their interests and form the government. However, in a republic, a constitution or charter of rights protects certain inalienable rights that cannot be taken away by the government, even if it has been elected by a majority of voters. In a "pure democracy," the majority is not restrained in this way and can impose its will on the minority.

Response by SFC Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 20 at 2015 10:26 AM

SFC Private RallyPoint Member — Fri, 20 Mar 2015 10:26:05 -0400

I can see this argument from both sides. The American populous is losing interest in Politics and Government. While it is understandable why, it is never-the-less upsetting.

It is kind of like making your children eat their vegetables. Not the prettiest of pictures, but it needs to be done.

I don't necessarily agree with it, since I am a dual citizen and if I 'submit my recommendation to the electoral college for who I feel is the lesser of two evils,' forfeit my status for that nation.

Response by SSG Norman Lihou made Mar 20 at 2015 1:03 PM

SSG Norman Lihou — Fri, 20 Mar 2015 13:03:23 -0400

Elections fall under the state authority, so the only way to change the law would be to create a constitutional amendment. End of story.

Response by SSgt Tim Ricci made Mar 20 at 2015 1:18 PM

SSgt Tim Ricci — Fri, 20 Mar 2015 13:18:30 -0400

I saw that on the news yesterday!! I vote because I want to. With other Avenues to vote it is really easy for the not so fortunate to vote also. ie... Early Voting. The PACs would also still push money out to candidates. Look at our current Persidents Donation lists and Money as well as H Clintons or even the top republicans. Call it Communisum Or Sociialism. Mantetory voting is wrong!

Response by CPL George Mann Jr made Mar 20 at 2015 1:28 PM

CPL George Mann Jr — Fri, 20 Mar 2015 13:28:49 -0400

There is nothing American about Obama at all. Can't you just see a bunch of jack boots coming to your home and forcefully escorting you to the polls.

Response by LCpl Tom Goudey made Mar 20 at 2015 1:54 PM

LCpl Tom Goudey — Fri, 20 Mar 2015 13:54:50 -0400

I am just glad that he is YOUR President and not mine, "That is all I have to say about that."

Response by SPC Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 20 at 2015 7:49 PM

SPC Private RallyPoint Member — Fri, 20 Mar 2015 19:49:53 -0400

I'm pretty sure that would require a constitutional amendment. Which pretty much means it's never going to happen barring some dramatic change.

Response by COL Jon Thompson made Mar 20 at 2015 10:16 PM

COL Jon Thompson — Fri, 20 Mar 2015 22:16:03 -0400

What would scare me about this if it became law would be enforcement of the law. It would require a very intrusive Federal law enforcement effort and people would have to show proof they voted.

Response by SGT Frank Leonardo made Mar 20 at 2015 10:18 PM

SGT Frank Leonardo — Fri, 20 Mar 2015 22:18:43 -0400

I like my right to vote when I want to and who I want,to vote for that is what makes US Americans

Response by SFC Dan Sorrow, M.S. made Mar 20 at 2015 10:23 PM

SFC Dan Sorrow, M.S. — Fri, 20 Mar 2015 22:23:36 -0400

My daughter-in-law is from Brazil and they have mandatory voting there. Until she becomes an American citizen, she still has to vote from here.

Take a look at their political situation. Even with mandatory voting, their political scene is more corrupt than ours.

Response by SSG (ret) William Martin made Mar 20 at 2015 10:35 PM

SSG (ret) William Martin — Fri, 20 Mar 2015 22:35:04 -0400

If its true, I am not surprised. The current administration is about forcing Americans to do the governments bidding.

Response by CW3 Craig Linghor made Mar 20 at 2015 10:38 PM

CW3 Craig Linghor — Fri, 20 Mar 2015 22:38:04 -0400

Ignorant people should not be compelled to vote. Instead of forced voting he should compel people to show a legal ID and pass a civics test at the voting booth.

Response by SSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 20 at 2015 11:02 PM

SSgt Private RallyPoint Member — Fri, 20 Mar 2015 23:02:03 -0400

When they can no longer motivate voters by giving away free stuff they must make it cost something to not vote. Then you will have more uninformed voters voting however their favorite pop star tells them to vote. And then, you will have nothing but hope and change.

Response by SSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 20 at 2015 11:23 PM

SSgt Private RallyPoint Member — Fri, 20 Mar 2015 23:23:45 -0400

The idea behind this is to get the illegal immigrant vote and by 'forcing' which is unconstitutional assuring a democrat to be in the White House and Senate. Our liberals here would be all in favor of such crap but such is the way things are.....

Response by SGT William Wolfe made Mar 20 at 2015 11:57 PM

SGT William Wolfe — Fri, 20 Mar 2015 23:57:45 -0400

He should remember this is the land of the free. As an American we should never be forced to vote especially if we don't like the candidates.

Response by SGM Erik Marquez made Mar 21 at 2015 1:36 AM

SGM Erik Marquez — Sat, 21 Mar 2015 01:36:23 -0400

What if.. now bare with me,,, what if this is a good idea....what if the requirement to vote included the ability to NOT vote.. IOW, the requirement was to go to the place of voting, but should you choose to not vote for a candidate offered, you selected "piss off".....or perhaps "NA"...lol

IOW...Requirement to participate in the voting process ,, not a requirement to vote for a candidate

Response by SSG(P) Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 21 at 2015 1:41 AM

SSG(P) Private RallyPoint Member — Sat, 21 Mar 2015 01:41:10 -0400

I'm for mandatory voting, but I don't want it to feel forced. It's a right and a privilege....over 20 million ppl didn't vote...last election.

Response by SSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 21 at 2015 1:56 AM

SSgt Private RallyPoint Member — Sat, 21 Mar 2015 01:56:02 -0400

This is political shock and awe. HCR, Immigration, voting, massive numbers of SM drummed. Revolving Sec of Def. countless wars, reduced funding, criticism of American exceptionalism, Executive Orders, too many vacations,, etc.

Response by CPO Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 21 at 2015 5:45 AM

CPO Private RallyPoint Member — Sat, 21 Mar 2015 05:45:47 -0400

"Forced" voting is *not* the same thing as "mandatory" voting. Semantics matter.

Some consider voting a civic responsibility. Others consider voting a civic duty, Still others think voting is a waste of time, but those with that opinion have a self fulfilling prophecy.

Compulsory voting is not a new idea. Mandatory voting laws were instituted in Belgium (1892), Argentina (1914), Australia (1924), Bolivia (1952) and several other countries. Venezuela and the Netherlands had compulsory voting previously but have since abolished it. I think about 15% of the world employs some for of mandatory voting.

Response by CPO Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 21 at 2015 6:08 AM

CPO Private RallyPoint Member — Sat, 21 Mar 2015 06:08:43 -0400

I do not endorse mandatory voting. I oppose "forced" voting.

However, Americans are required to perform jury duty. American children are required to attend school (public, private, or home) in most of the country. American males are required to register for the draft. Immunizations are mandatory in most of America.

What are the details of the proposal? Would a citizen simply have to report to a polling place on election day but still be free to leave without casting a vote? Would casting a vote be mandatory? Do you have to vote on every issue on the ballot or just a single issue on the ballot? Would the law be enforced? Would there be a reward for compliance or a penalty for disobedience? What would the reward or penalty be?

Taken in perspective of other requirements, and depending on specific details, I really do not see the idea as being that objectionable.

Response by Capt Whitney Davis made Mar 21 at 2015 7:05 AM

Capt Whitney Davis — Sat, 21 Mar 2015 07:05:31 -0400

Simply because I enjoy swimming against the stream: why would mandatory voting be so awful? I concede that there are many uninformed people, but mandatory voting would surely make it so there are a few less.

As for the argument that mandatory voting is a partisan ploy to get more Democrats to vote: the premise of that argument is that if the whole country voted Democrats would win every time. Does that not signal a problem with the Republican Party? If you cannot win elections with the majority of the vote, when the entire country participates, perhaps your policies are the problem.

Response by CW3 Craig Linghor made Mar 21 at 2015 8:03 AM

CW3 Craig Linghor — Sat, 21 Mar 2015 08:03:31 -0400

Over my dead body. I'll vote again when there is a politician worth voting for.

Response by SrA Matthew Knight made Mar 21 at 2015 8:27 AM

SrA Matthew Knight — Sat, 21 Mar 2015 08:27:03 -0400

I think everyone should put forth the time and effort to vote and I myself love to have the ability to vote. However, voting is a right, not a requirement. There is no reason that we should be forcing our citizens to vote. If they don't want to take advantage of the system they have access to then why make them?

Response by MSgt Stephanie McCalister made Mar 21 at 2015 9:10 AM

MSgt Stephanie McCalister — Sat, 21 Mar 2015 09:10:48 -0400

I wouldn't be adverse to mandatory registering to vote (with ID no less!) ...

But to be forced to 'exercise the right' to vote? That completely counteracts & contradicts the spirit and intent of the Constitution! For someone who supposedly studied law in college & claims to have been a constitutional lawyer, it's mind-boggling how many ways both Congress & the American People are being sideswiped by this POTUS & his administration!

As for mandatory voting, Absolute Power Corrupts, Absolutely!

I don't want to see this in our nation!
I was in Panama during the election period not long before Operation Just Cause, entire villages were being bused in by Noriega's thugs, & being supplied with plenty of booze ... and we were public enemy #1 ...
Someone had the bright idea that we aircrew should travel in civilian clothes so we wouldn't stand out & be targeted .. and then stuck us on USAF Blue buses with US Gov license plates to transport us across the Canal Zone to our quarters ... All the incoming traffic had the roads all jammed up ... and we got hung up in it ...
A bunch of the 'locals' jumped out & were yelling & attacking our bus, so many they were rocking it from side to side ... we had the windows closed (in that muggy heat!) & our bags stacked on the window seats for any sort of protection, as we all sat on the 'aisle' seating ...
The local police & PDF (Panama Defense Force), just stood around & laughed, did nothing to hold the agitators back. Finally there was a break in the log jam & traffic started moving again ... and the agitators finally started to fall back, a few die hards running alongside or throwing rocks & whatever else they could find to throw ...

Judging on situations such as observed in locations such as Ferguson MO, when outsiders came in & stirred up an already volatile situation, I believe forced Voting, could result in similar outbreaks across our nation in our communities ...

I see NOTHING positive about violating our Constitutional rights by mandating voting!

Response by MSG David Chappell made Mar 21 at 2015 10:06 AM

MSG David Chappell — Sat, 21 Mar 2015 10:06:10 -0400

Will the next step be lifting the voting restriction on those convicted of felonies

Response by SSG Steven Borders made Mar 21 at 2015 11:23 AM

SSG Steven Borders — Sat, 21 Mar 2015 11:23:10 -0400

I am on the fence with this one. As I see it makes people go out and vote. But what about our choice not to vote? That is what America is about the ability to choose what we want to do and who to vote for. Or not to vote for that matter.

Response by MSgt Scott Gaston made Mar 21 at 2015 2:26 PM

MSgt Scott Gaston — Sat, 21 Mar 2015 14:26:35 -0400

What the hell do we have all volunteer Force's for if not to protect the Constitution and Bill of Rights, and our fellow Citizen's protections according to them?! Might as well go to a conscripted force to fall in line with those who don't care enough to vote being forced to do so. If you're too lazy to get up off your six to go and vote, how likely are you to look beyond the "Hollywood Soundbite" and vote according to truth not emotional popularity?!

Response by 1SG Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 21 at 2015 2:37 PM

1SG Private RallyPoint Member — Sat, 21 Mar 2015 14:37:44 -0400

Actually, the President was musing if having a mandatory voting law would change the obvious attempts to block some population groups from having access to the polls.

He was making a point about voter ID laws and abuse of the system and not attempting to be a dictator with this topic. Don't turn this into something it is not.

Response by TSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 21 at 2015 2:52 PM

TSgt Private RallyPoint Member — Sat, 21 Mar 2015 14:52:28 -0400

A lot of Americans voice their opinions on how the government should be ran, what laws to pass, and what to do in a crisis. This being said, how many Americans actually voice their opinion by voting; we all know that electoral votes determine who wins, but that's a different issue. By "forcing" people to vote one way or another, they are at least making a choice as to who is in charge, and thus being "responsible" for their actions. We always hear the media stories talking about people not taking responsibility for what they did, well here's your chance.

Response by SFC Michael Hasbun made Mar 21 at 2015 6:04 PM

SFC Michael Hasbun — Sat, 21 Mar 2015 18:04:59 -0400

Bad news everyone.... The media played everyone for suckers again! Let's hear it for out of context drama creation!

No, Washington Post, President Obama did NOT "suggest requiring everyone to vote"

Originally posted at Eclectablog.Ya gotta admit, it's terrific clickbait, though, right?Yesterday, the Washington ...

Response by Sgt Michael Garley made Mar 21 at 2015 6:11 PM

Sgt Michael Garley — Sat, 21 Mar 2015 18:11:51 -0400

That's as bad as the healthcare!! Which I am still pis*ed about seeing how mine has increase 300.00 per year since jan last year.

Response by SSG Peter Muse made Mar 21 at 2015 6:55 PM

SSG Peter Muse — Sat, 21 Mar 2015 18:55:56 -0400

It's funny how questions asked here are seemingly worded and structured to get the right juiced response. Words inserted or left out to prime the discussion and often send it farther astray than any telephone game ever could. And we are the military so mindful of the damage done by the grapevine news when trying to lead through tough operational environments. What he talking about was how much things could change if everyone voted and made a footnote comment about countries that mandate it before transitioning back into the value and importance of the unfettered right to vote and the importance of everyone voting. Watch the video. The question asked would have been so much more valuable if you asked us what we thought about the values and impact of voting. We are supposed to be the ambassadors of our country at home and abroad. No matter how much I oppose or support the politics and decisions of our leaders, I do my best to be the best advocate of rights and right actions wherever I can influence them. A lot of people here need to grow up.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/03/19/politics/obama-mandatory-voting/

Obama: Maybe it's time for mandatory voting - CNNPolitics.com

The president whose major policy achievement is mandatory health insurance thinks maybe voting should be mandatory, too.

Response by SGT Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 21 at 2015 6:56 PM

SGT Private RallyPoint Member — Sat, 21 Mar 2015 18:56:52 -0400

Welp, we collectively chose to vote a random guy into Presidency based on skin color. Pretty sure that, no matter if cohersed or not, the results aren't going to be too drastic.

Response by CW4 Glen Nardin made Mar 21 at 2015 7:13 PM

CW4 Glen Nardin — Sat, 21 Mar 2015 19:13:26 -0400

There is just nothing like espousing "freedom to vote" by requiring you--by federal law--to show up at the voting booth. How many levels of "UNAMERICAN" could this statement attain?

The day that becomes law is the first voting day in my 30 years of eligibility that I will not be there.

Response by SSG Leonard Johnson made Mar 21 at 2015 7:27 PM

SSG Leonard Johnson — Sat, 21 Mar 2015 19:27:21 -0400

well Number one I don't think it will ever happen.....but then again I was wrong about the healthcare bill and had to shut my small business down....hhahahhahahahaha go figure
but then again it would be job security for Soldiers going around and dragging drunk ass Libtard college boys out of their dorm to force them to vote hahahahhahahahaa now that would be awesome to give them a beat down ;)

Response by SFC Mark Merino made Mar 21 at 2015 7:44 PM

SFC Mark Merino — Sat, 21 Mar 2015 19:44:26 -0400

"Land of the free."

Response by 1SG Joe Messier made Mar 21 at 2015 7:47 PM

1SG Joe Messier — Sat, 21 Mar 2015 19:47:25 -0400

One of the "RIGHTS" we have is to voluntarily go to the polls to vote. The second you force that action is is no longer a right, it then becomes another law that infringes on our "RIGHTS". One of my "RIGHTS" is to be a non participant in the political process. POTUS just doesn't get it, my disenfranchisement is my own, not his. "I'm the president, I can force you to do what I want!" Crazy SOB sounds like a 1st time junior leader in the military. We've all been there, saying things like if I had my way military service would be mandatory. Problem as I see it he's in a position to do it.

Response by PO3 Jonathan Harp made Mar 21 at 2015 8:38 PM

PO3 Jonathan Harp — Sat, 21 Mar 2015 20:38:24 -0400

He's already taken away our right to choose healthcare, now he's making us vote... We will be told what to eat next! He's spitting on the constitution we were sworn to defend. It makes me sick!

Response by WO1 Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 22 at 2015 2:02 AM

WO1 Private RallyPoint Member — Sun, 22 Mar 2015 02:02:44 -0400

Forced voting is along the same dispicibal idea of the requirement for all Americans to buy healthcare. Though it is a good idea, it is unable to be enforced. It is 100% unconstitutional to demand people to vote. Like wise, it is unconstitutional to force citizens to buy in any market, including health insurance.

Response by SFC Lee Flowers made Mar 22 at 2015 8:03 AM

SFC Lee Flowers — Sun, 22 Mar 2015 08:03:46 -0400

I am totally, 200% against everything this ? stands for! Wrong person for Commander in Chief. 2016 and a wake up and it couldn't come faster................this guy scares the hell out of me. Compete idiot! And the VP as well.

Response by SPC Jan Allbright, M.Sc., R.S. made Mar 22 at 2015 10:01 AM

SPC Jan Allbright, M.Sc., R.S. — Sun, 22 Mar 2015 10:01:31 -0400

The fewer people vote the more the radicals run the show.

Response by SCPO Deric Wright made Mar 22 at 2015 10:15 AM

SCPO Deric Wright — Sun, 22 Mar 2015 10:15:07 -0400

Not surprised with this big idea coming from a guy who has never had a job!

Response by SGT Timothy Byrd made Mar 22 at 2015 2:10 PM

SGT Timothy Byrd — Sun, 22 Mar 2015 14:10:55 -0400

The only Forced voting I'm for is Voting Obama & All his Anti America dictator regime buddies out of office......

Response by SGT Rick Ash made Mar 22 at 2015 2:19 PM

SGT Rick Ash — Sun, 22 Mar 2015 14:19:38 -0400

I vote in all elections. I think there is massive voter fraud. Check the statistics for 2012.

Response by LCDR Rabbah Rona Matlow made Mar 22 at 2015 3:13 PM

LCDR Rabbah Rona Matlow — Sun, 22 Mar 2015 15:13:40 -0400

Cpl Anthony Pearson I'm going to call BS on you here. If you read the text of the article you cited, Obama says:

"If everybody voted, then it would completely change the political map in this country," Obama said, calling it "potentially transformative."

He did not call for "forced voting" at least from this article. It's also important to note that this article was from Fox news, which is very right wing, and propagated things like the Birthers...

Response by PO1 John Meyer, CPC made Mar 22 at 2015 3:36 PM

PO1 John Meyer, CPC — Sun, 22 Mar 2015 15:36:58 -0400

First, this administration has forced us to buy health insurance. Now it's attempting to make us vote like they do in North Korea.

What's next?????

It's the little things we allow government to take away from us, which will end up being the big things like our freedom and independence from government if we don't stop government over reach.

Wasn't that part of the reason for breaking ties to England in the first place????

Response by SPC Richard White made Mar 22 at 2015 4:27 PM

SPC Richard White — Sun, 22 Mar 2015 16:27:28 -0400

Voting is a right and it can be taken away,You can't force someone to vote it isn't right

Response by PV2 Violet Case made Mar 22 at 2015 4:58 PM

PV2 Violet Case — Sun, 22 Mar 2015 16:58:41 -0400

I do think the opposed have it. I don't get it how this guy thinks he can take all the lives that have been lost and are being lost and ruined for the freedom of this country and throw it aside like it was all nothing. I just don't get why he is still who he is and where he is. We need a person who was or is military to run this country.

Response by SGT Joe Sabedra made Mar 22 at 2015 6:21 PM

SGT Joe Sabedra — Sun, 22 Mar 2015 18:21:05 -0400

That's the communist doctrine.
Give you idiots as options and make you chose one.

Response by CW5 Jim Steddum made Mar 22 at 2015 6:56 PM

CW5 Jim Steddum — Sun, 22 Mar 2015 18:56:49 -0400

Enforced in what way? Come on, form the party that opposes voter ID, mandatory voting? Sounds pre-cold war era USSR, doesn't it?

Response by CW3 Bradley Keiser made Mar 22 at 2015 7:32 PM

CW3 Bradley Keiser — Sun, 22 Mar 2015 19:32:31 -0400

Give me a break. We can't force illegals to leave the country, but we're going to force every citizen of this nation to stand in lines to vote for someone/something they know nothing about or even care about. These are the people who should stay at home and exercise their right to be uninformed and not burden the rest of us with their bad choices.
This is about a Chicago politician realizing that there aren't enough dead people to get Democrat politicians elected, so now it's time to branch out to get the stupid and lazy vote.

Response by SSG(P) Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 22 at 2015 8:31 PM

SSG(P) Private RallyPoint Member — Sun, 22 Mar 2015 20:31:12 -0400

First of all, voting is a right and a privilege, as well as a duty. It is NOT a requirement.

Secondly, this brings up a logistical question: If Voter IDs are not required, how do you ensure that 100% of all voters have voted? The only other way is to round people up and transport them to a voting center and not release them until they have voted. Obviously the WW II Nazi Boxcar imagery pops up. Do we really want this?

Another bad idea that should never see the light of day.

Response by Capt Jeff S. made Mar 22 at 2015 9:55 PM

Capt Jeff S. — Sun, 22 Mar 2015 21:55:37 -0400

The intent and purpose behind this is not one that has America's best interest at heart.

Obama has been opening our borders and importing illegals in order to change the Demographics. The sole purpose behind "forced voting" is to keep our liberal elitist Democrats in power. They count on the support of their largely ignorant base, which isn't motivated to get to the polls like they were in 2008. And in 2012, their apathy cost Obama control of the Senate. For Obama to go out on top, he needs to be followed by another Democrat who can pardon him and do whatever needs to be done to preserve what's left of his legacy.

Democrats tend to vote out of habit, and since LBJ, blacks have overwhelmingly voted Democrat -- just as LBJ predicted they would when he signed the Civil Rights legislation. If Obama can't get his minority base to the polls voluntarily, he'll do what he has to do to get them to vote involuntarily. He is counting on them to vote straight ticket Democrat regardless of whether or not they are better off under the Progressive policies of this Administration.

Response by Sgt Ryan Bowman made Mar 22 at 2015 10:21 PM

Sgt Ryan Bowman — Sun, 22 Mar 2015 22:21:19 -0400

A good portion of those who don't vote either don't understand politics well enough to make a good decision, or they don't care enough. In either case, I would hate to be out voted by that majority.. (Anymore than I already am)

Response by PO3 Tim Swimm made Mar 22 at 2015 10:31 PM

PO3 Tim Swimm — Sun, 22 Mar 2015 22:31:00 -0400

Well if he forced then we would still be home of the brave but would land of the free still work?

Response by PO2 Edward Shelton made Mar 22 at 2015 10:53 PM

PO2 Edward Shelton — Sun, 22 Mar 2015 22:53:57 -0400

The government seems to have been slashing at the Constitution left and right over the last few years, last I checked we have the right to vote.

Response by SGT Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 22 at 2015 11:41 PM

SGT Private RallyPoint Member — Sun, 22 Mar 2015 23:41:16 -0400

I fail to understand how forced //voting// smells like communism or socialism to you, especially both at the same time, which is impossible by definition. Now I may have clicked "all for it" but that's because there isn't a "sort of for it with some caveats" option. First, I do think that it would be nigh on impossible to enforce without tossing a ton of money at it . . . and I think that is bad. Second, and this is why I think it's a good idea . . . in theory, Just look at the dismal turn out for the mid-term elections.

Response by SSG Jim Foreman made Mar 23 at 2015 12:33 AM

SSG Jim Foreman — Mon, 23 Mar 2015 00:33:24 -0400

This is the Libs way of getting the votes from the lazy "living off the government" group.

Response by SGT Jeremiah B. made Mar 23 at 2015 12:35 AM

SGT Jeremiah B. — Mon, 23 Mar 2015 00:35:15 -0400

It did not seem to be even remotely a serious proposal to me, so storm in a teacup. HOWEVER, several Western nations do it. I don't think Australia, Luxembourg and Belgium are lock stepping into Fascist Oblivion.

Do I think it's a good idea? No, but right now we're stuck in a cycle where only the most irritated or angry vote, which leaves us with less...desirable candidates. We need to figure a way to get people in the middle to think voting is actually worthwhile.

Response by SrA Jonathan Carbonaro made Mar 23 at 2015 6:52 AM

SrA Jonathan Carbonaro — Mon, 23 Mar 2015 06:52:12 -0400

"The people who cast the votes don't decide an election, the people who count the votes do" - Joseph Stalin

Frankily I'm against anything the government says I'm forced to do as a citizen, and I won't have them force stuff on my civilian friends and family.

Response by Cpl Justin Sowell made Mar 23 at 2015 9:51 AM

Cpl Justin Sowell — Mon, 23 Mar 2015 09:51:39 -0400

We already are a socialist country for the most part. The government has seized as much control as they can. My question is when is enough going to be enough? I just want to live my life the way I see fit, and be left the hell alone. But, these guys want to tell me how to live my life, and force me to do it their way. Sound familiar? I left the military so I could enjoy the freedoms I defended. Not so I could have them slowly stripped away again.

Response by MSgt Allan Vrboncic made Mar 23 at 2015 10:11 AM

MSgt Allan Vrboncic — Mon, 23 Mar 2015 10:11:50 -0400

Obama is wiping his butt with the U.S. Constitution once again.

Response by Capt Richard I P. made Mar 23 at 2015 10:28 AM

Capt Richard I P. — Mon, 23 Mar 2015 10:28:05 -0400

I am opposed. Mostly because the powers of the federal government must be expressly granted in the constitution, or are otherwise reserved to the people or states.

Response by PO3 Thomas Gregory made Mar 23 at 2015 11:07 AM

PO3 Thomas Gregory — Mon, 23 Mar 2015 11:07:39 -0400

Voting is a right not a requirement

Response by MAJ Matthew Arnold made Mar 23 at 2015 11:41 AM

MAJ Matthew Arnold — Mon, 23 Mar 2015 11:41:49 -0400

All part of the Big Brother, socialist state, where the ruling class knows what's good for you, and you will obey or be forced to obey.

Response by PO1 John Pokrzywa made Mar 23 at 2015 12:16 PM

PO1 John Pokrzywa — Mon, 23 Mar 2015 12:16:13 -0400

This opens the door more for computerized voter databases, that then categorized the entire population by their voting preferences.

Those databases will then be cross-referenced, (for our own safety, of course).
On the other hand, this makes computerized/database tampered voter fraud much, much, simpler.
I believe in the dream of a free America. If people don't vote, perhaps instead of mandatory voting, perhaps make it a mandatory national holiday so working people can vote? Unless they do away with the 2 party system, which of late seems to force us all into voting for the least of 2 evils vice a candidate we think would be most ideal, (or they put a "no confidence/redo/none of the above" category) I am uninterested in more government mandatory ANYTHING.

Response by SA Harold Hansmann made Mar 23 at 2015 12:44 PM

SA Harold Hansmann — Mon, 23 Mar 2015 12:44:10 -0400

Sounds like this country needs another revolution to cleanse corruption from the system.

Response by SFC Jeff L. made Mar 23 at 2015 1:06 PM

SFC Jeff L. — Mon, 23 Mar 2015 13:06:22 -0400

The last thing we need is to force people to vote who are ignorant of politics in the first place. Personally, I think it would be better if only people who paid a net tax were afforded the opportunity to vote since it's the disposition of their money that is really at issue during a vote.

Response by SGT Rick Ash made Mar 23 at 2015 1:32 PM

SGT Rick Ash — Mon, 23 Mar 2015 13:32:03 -0400

I am totally opposed. Who does he think he is?

Response by COL Ted Mc made Mar 23 at 2015 1:39 PM

COL Ted Mc — Mon, 23 Mar 2015 13:39:39 -0400

First, let me point out that one of the few countries in the world with "forced voting" is the Free Democratic Socialist Marxist-Leninist People's Republic of Australia.

I am totally opposed to "forced voting" UNLESS the "NONE OF THE ABOVE" option is available on the ballot

(if "NONE OF THE ABOVE" wins, they have to re-run the election with all new candidates

[if "NONE OF THE ABOVE" wins again they have to re-run the election with all new candidates and are PROHIBITED from advertising - or even hinting at - any 'party' affiliation

{if "NONE OF THE ABOVE" wins again, the seat is filled by a random drawing from the voters' list}]).

Response by SPC David Hannaman made Mar 23 at 2015 1:48 PM

SPC David Hannaman — Mon, 23 Mar 2015 13:48:33 -0400

I'm all for it, as long as there is also a test for people requiring the voters to demonstrate a remedial understanding of the issues that they're voting on.

All you have to do is a YouTube search for "Jaywalking"

Response by Maj Mike Sciales made Mar 23 at 2015 2:00 PM

Maj Mike Sciales — Mon, 23 Mar 2015 14:00:59 -0400

I'm afraid I cannot put such a dystopian spin on this proposal. The sad fact is, most Americans don't vote. Worse yet, far more vote for the next American Idol than their elected representatives. Those representatives know that so they really can do almost anything they want (if not ostentatious and combative like that recent disgrace - Ex Rep Schock from Illinois "The Downton Abbey" guy) and nobody will call them out on it come election day. People feel disconnected and powerless. Australia has mandatory voting or a $75 fine. I was there during an election and talked to regular people. There wasn't much complaining. They also vote on Saturday and if you have to work on Saturday, you get mandatory paid time off to vote. Do you have to vote for a particular candidate? No, of course not, but vote you must. I was a "voting rights" officer and I had to hound active duty service members to exercise the one franchise they were most invested in maintaining (with their own lives). Voting is not only a right, it's a duty to the nation. It's OK to hate whoever is in office, but if you don't do anything to improve our representation through the act of voting then you aren't much of an American and certainly no Patriot. I also recommend voting anti-incumbent at every election - since we don't have term limits.

Response by SGT(P) Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 23 at 2015 2:27 PM

SGT(P) Private RallyPoint Member — Mon, 23 Mar 2015 14:27:29 -0400

In our country we are suppose to have the freedom to make a choice or not make one. I think it is a silly venture. A lot of the people that do not vote due to not tracking any information on the candidates would vote blind just to get it out of the way.

Response by SSG Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 23 at 2015 2:30 PM

SSG Private RallyPoint Member — Mon, 23 Mar 2015 14:30:57 -0400

Requiring citizens to exercise their rights doesn't prevent them from selecting none of the above.

Response by SGT Rick Ash made Mar 23 at 2015 4:39 PM

SGT Rick Ash — Mon, 23 Mar 2015 16:39:47 -0400

Totally opposed. The influx of illegals encouraged by Obama has him convinced they will all vote for Democratic agenda items. Or, is he angling for a third term? We must get rid of him and the sooner we do the safer we are.

Response by PO1 Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 23 at 2015 6:00 PM

PO1 Private RallyPoint Member — Mon, 23 Mar 2015 18:00:50 -0400

sounds to me congress over sexuallee active with your wife again even tested probably see if they could get away with it

congress great way for arabs to gang rape a soliders wife upcoming abortion vote make it agains the law all arabs fall back let there own men gang rape there wives

follow the mouth of hyour leader no matter what aren't you go ahead punk make all arabs dayyyyyyyyyyy were did you get this world wide news story obamas sexualle active again

Response by PO1 Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 23 at 2015 6:01 PM

PO1 Private RallyPoint Member — Mon, 23 Mar 2015 18:01:51 -0400

fall back let there own men do it exploit it with use of tv

Response by CPT Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 23 at 2015 6:06 PM

CPT Private RallyPoint Member — Mon, 23 Mar 2015 18:06:08 -0400

This not only violates our liberty but POTUS knows what he is doing, first allow all illegal immigrants to stay in the country; tell the poor/lower class the republican hates them and aren't willing to provide for them, provide all free healthcare finally, make it mandatory to vote so they can vote democrat.

Response by TSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 23 at 2015 7:14 PM

TSgt Private RallyPoint Member — Mon, 23 Mar 2015 19:14:16 -0400

Another downside from forcing people to vote is the simple fact that people don't care. They will put any name down because they have to vote and this could end up putting an individual in office who has no business being there. It will turn the presidency election into a gamble rather than earning the position by being the best candidate.

Response by PFC Timothy Fitzgerald made Mar 23 at 2015 10:29 PM

PFC Timothy Fitzgerald — Mon, 23 Mar 2015 22:29:43 -0400

Of course chairman MaObama proposed such an idea, after he's opened up the borders to ALL those brand spanking new Liberal voters !

Response by SSG Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 24 at 2015 8:49 AM

SSG Private RallyPoint Member — Tue, 24 Mar 2015 08:49:26 -0400

This is just a bad idea all together. There's enough corruption within the government. This is just another opportunity for presidential candidates to have more and more corruption opportunities. That's just one out of the many cons to this proposal.

Response by SFC Dean D. made Mar 24 at 2015 1:12 PM

SFC Dean D. — Tue, 24 Mar 2015 13:12:08 -0400

Forcing the un-informed, potentially ignorant masses can only lead to the popularity contest we call the presidential election to get even WORSE. The only hope for good leadership is voting by informed citizens that care about their nation's future.

Response by SGT Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 24 at 2015 3:11 PM

SGT Private RallyPoint Member — Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:11:13 -0400

I think it sucks. It is socialism, and is exactly what Obama's goal is. It's to make our beloved country a socialist country, like in his Muslim homelands. Those countries people are not only forced to vote, but if they vote for the wrong person their vote is thrown out. Slowly but surely Obama is trying to sneak in other countries beliefs and how their government rules everything. This guy rattles the shit out of me. No telling what he will try to do before, thank my God, his term is finally over.

Response by Cadet 4th Class Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 24 at 2015 4:56 PM

Cadet 4th Class Private RallyPoint Member — Tue, 24 Mar 2015 16:56:36 -0400

I feel that voting, like having health and car insurance, or vaccinating your kids isn't something that people should be forced to do with a law, but should know to do it anyway.

Response by SSG Kenneth Lanning made Mar 24 at 2015 8:04 PM

SSG Kenneth Lanning — Tue, 24 Mar 2015 20:04:38 -0400

I have chosen not to vote in any presidential election since joining the military; I personally think I would be effectively voting for which person I want my boss to be-so how do I react if the other person is elected? Most don't think this way, but granted I also believe since I didn't vote one way or the other I don't have the right to complain about the outcome...but having said that I definitely do not agree with a lot of the choices being made and/or brought to the table. In another three years hell yeah I'll be a lot more vocal on things, but for now I'll just simply nod my head and drive on.

Response by SGT Kathleen Light made Mar 24 at 2015 8:08 PM

SGT Kathleen Light — Tue, 24 Mar 2015 20:08:55 -0400

Forced voting set up under an electronic system......he couldn't get the health care website running! Could you imagine this

Response by TSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 24 at 2015 8:42 PM

TSgt Private RallyPoint Member — Tue, 24 Mar 2015 20:42:24 -0400

From what I have seen of forced voting, it usually is used or enforced when there is only one political party in charge. The political party is often left leaning.

Response by Cpl Glynis Sakowicz made Mar 25 at 2015 9:12 AM

Cpl Glynis Sakowicz — Wed, 25 Mar 2015 09:12:22 -0400

I have been staring off into the distance for several minutes, trying to figure this one out. On one hand, we are tasked with choosing those who stand in for us in Washington, which is important, but it seems to me, that, to have a hand in such a decision, a person really ought to have a stake in the end results... such as being an actual citizen of this country, so I fully support Voter ID.

Before people start howling about racial discrimination, I' d like to add, that you need ID to survive in this world. You can't get alcohol, cigarettes, a bank account or a job without ID... you can't collect welfare, food stamps or cash a check without ID... so it seems to be a rather moot point, that a person should have ID to vote.

Now, that said, I have to wonder how it is, that this Government is pondering a demand to make everyone vote, when they don't see the need to have any ID. Exactly how is that going to work? So, does this mean that Washington has decided we actually need ID, or has it decided that we owe it to our country to vote several times each election, since no one knows who we are, and its entirely possible.... Geeze, I am getting a headache just trying to figure this one out..

Response by LCDR Steve Didio made Mar 25 at 2015 11:29 AM

LCDR Steve Didio — Wed, 25 Mar 2015 11:29:31 -0400

Sounds like a by product of the ass kicking he took in November 2014.

Response by SFC Ian Lumgair made Mar 25 at 2015 12:29 PM

SFC Ian Lumgair — Wed, 25 Mar 2015 12:29:58 -0400

I used this in a reply it still is true for the overall subject. Well, first of all, let's backtrack to the idea. Mandatory voting is a violation of our civil rights, just as denying a citizen a right to vote is a violation. Casting a vote is speech. It is showing support or opposition to a candidate or proposal. Making voting mandatory means voting is no longer a right. It's an obligation. It's forced speech. If we were forced to attend a church, but had a choice of several churches, we would still (most of us, anyway) recognize that this is a violation of our freedom to decline to practice religion at all. Not voting isn't just an expression of apathy. It's also a form of protest. Forcing somebody to exercise a right makes it an the opposite its no longer a right it a forced action that is by definition tyranny. Just food for thought every time something like this is stated by POTUS, or VPOTUS says something stupid there is something else going on the our attention is being pulled away from. What is going on?

Response by TSgt Henry Dickson made Mar 25 at 2015 12:57 PM

TSgt Henry Dickson — Wed, 25 Mar 2015 12:57:03 -0400

You can't get identification for the US citizens without breaching their Privacy. So how can you insure they vote? This will never work.

Response by LTJG Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 25 at 2015 1:10 PM

LTJG Private RallyPoint Member — Wed, 25 Mar 2015 13:10:20 -0400

Military or not, you SHOULD vote, but it SHOULD NOT be mandatory. This country was built on freedom and liberty. When someone is FORCED to do something, those rights are lost and then what makes us different than 3rd world countries with no government?

Response by SP5 Richard Maze made Mar 25 at 2015 1:19 PM

SP5 Richard Maze — Wed, 25 Mar 2015 13:19:46 -0400

Not voting is an extension of your right to express your views. Sometimes, there is nobody deserving of your vote. However, having more people vote would be a good thing. There are a lot of elections decided by a very low turnout, so a politician can be put into office based on just 4 or 5 percent of the population.

Response by Sgt Billy Nitsch made Mar 25 at 2015 1:39 PM

Sgt Billy Nitsch — Wed, 25 Mar 2015 13:39:00 -0400

First it'll be forced to vote, next it'll be if you don't have dark skin and brown eyes you'll be shot on site ( aka very similar to hurler with the blonde hair blue eyes technique. Coincidence I think not ). Then it just On and on from there until AMERICA wakes up anyway.

Response by PO1 Chad Alcock made Mar 25 at 2015 1:50 PM

PO1 Chad Alcock — Wed, 25 Mar 2015 13:50:08 -0400

The problem I see with it is the ones that don't take the responsibility to register, and therefore to vote, have no room to complain (though they do anyway). With at least some of these people I'm not sure that I would want them to vote. I myself have abstained from voting for something because I was unable to make an informed decision, because I hadn't done enough research. To many people vote one way or another because they saw a billboard, or an advertisement a recognized the name on the ballot. With forced voting we I think we would get more people just checking a box without really knowing what they were voting for.

Response by SGT Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 25 at 2015 1:56 PM

SGT Private RallyPoint Member — Wed, 25 Mar 2015 13:56:55 -0400

I had to share this photo! This baby has a point!!

Response by SPC David S. made Mar 25 at 2015 1:58 PM

SPC David S. — Wed, 25 Mar 2015 13:58:55 -0400

I have a funny feeling that compulsory voting won't be used to get this pushed through.
Also that some sort of fee is part of the deal much like Australia. Some 33 countries have a similar law yet only 10 enforce it. Strangely enough the State of Georgia has a compulsory voting law way back in 1777 and wasn't repelled until 1789.

Response by PO1 Glenn Boucher made Mar 25 at 2015 2:11 PM

PO1 Glenn Boucher — Wed, 25 Mar 2015 14:11:30 -0400

Voting is our right and whether we exercise that right or not is up to us.
If you vote its because you want a say in what is going on, who will be our elected leaders, etc..
If you don't vote then you, at least I will assume here, don't care about who is elected or what issues are being brought to the table.
Forcing someone to vote is going to have people just go punch the ticket and get out, you will have too many disinterested voters overall and that will hurt the process.

Response by LTC Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 25 at 2015 3:45 PM

LTC Private RallyPoint Member — Wed, 25 Mar 2015 15:45:33 -0400

WOW! "forced voting" remember nothing is as it seems... this is not random, but rather calculated for something much larger? I would take take notice of anyone seeking to force such an agenda. You can't make this up... Who is John Galt?

Response by CPT Pedro Meza made Mar 25 at 2015 8:07 PM

CPT Pedro Meza — Wed, 25 Mar 2015 20:07:45 -0400

All it takes for Evil to Triumph is for One Good Man to do nothing! So stop whining vote and bring about changes or not vote and whine. I will WINE after I vote!

Response by CPT Pedro Meza made Mar 25 at 2015 8:46 PM

CPT Pedro Meza — Wed, 25 Mar 2015 20:46:51 -0400

What would have been the results if he had obligated bar hoping?
I vote no matter what and I have a drink no matter what!
All it takes for Evil to triumph is for one Good Man to do Nothing!
If you have to be force to do something for the better good, then what are you?

Response by SSG Robert Burns made Mar 25 at 2015 9:26 PM

SSG Robert Burns — Wed, 25 Mar 2015 21:26:19 -0400

Because FORCING us to pay taxes works good too.

Response by SPC Lawrence Baker made Mar 25 at 2015 9:27 PM

SPC Lawrence Baker — Wed, 25 Mar 2015 21:27:56 -0400

why should you be required to vote . with all due respect , the people voting now need to be more informed including my self on particular elections . if the voting public are not voting now . the same people will vote uninformed because they are required . I say no it is a right and privilege ,but not a mandatory thing .

Response by MAJ Ron Peery made Mar 26 at 2015 8:35 AM

MAJ Ron Peery — Thu, 26 Mar 2015 08:35:53 -0400

Another power grab from America's dictator wanna-be. I vote in every election, and don't need this urban cowboy giving me directives. God willing, the next president will be a real American who takes his or her oath of office seriously.

Response by MAJ Ron Peery made Mar 26 at 2015 8:55 AM

MAJ Ron Peery — Thu, 26 Mar 2015 08:55:54 -0400

Hmmmm... My initial response was uncompromisingly negative. But now that I think on it, this could be an interesting tool to extend to other areas.

People have the right to vote, but they don't (not just a recent phenomenon, it's been this way since the founding.) So, we make voting mandatory. Okay, cool. Now everyone votes,

Lets look at another option....people have the right to keep and bear arms, but they don't. Why not make it mandatory to own a gun? In fact, this is not so far fetched, as the Militia Law of 1792 did just that. There's an idea I can get behind!

Response by PO1 Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 26 at 2015 9:19 AM

PO1 Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 26 Mar 2015 09:19:24 -0400

We should never compel voting. I have not voted once in my life because I have never taken the time to educate myself about the issues surrounding the candidates. I believe that is the only responsible thing to do if you are not up to date on said issues. Forced voting will cause me and millions of other Americans (who are unable to make informed decisions) to cast extremely biased votes based on emotion, race, creed, or color. That is, by definition, prejudicial. Why should we industrialize stupidity?

Response by CAPT Gary Foster made Mar 26 at 2015 9:59 AM

CAPT Gary Foster — Thu, 26 Mar 2015 09:59:22 -0400

Forced to vote? How about properly educated to vote? I know this would require an amendment but we have too many people that vote in this country based on popularity and not on substance. I would like to see two things happen: 1. Picture identification or SSN required to vote (so we know you are not dead). 2. A simple test that asks what congressional district you live in; who is your representative; who are your state senators; who is the Speaker of the House/Senate; who is the VP; who is the President. How many states in the union; what are the three branches of government; have you filed to pay taxes. Of course, those of liberal persuasion would argue that this is too intrusive and anti American. I don't care what they think. I am tired of having elected leaders based on their color or gender instead of what they stand for.

Response by CPT Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 26 at 2015 10:58 AM

CPT Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 26 Mar 2015 10:58:03 -0400

https://www.rallypoint.com/topics/politics/answers/obama-suggests-forced-voting-for-americans-how-does-that-grab-you#

Response by PFC Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 26 at 2015 2:34 PM

PFC Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 26 Mar 2015 14:34:30 -0400

I am opposed to the idea of mandatory voting. I can't stand the idea of the gov't telling people they HAVE to do anything. That being said, I am in favor of making election day a federal holiday, to enable more people to vote without having to have work conflicts. Just a thought

Response by SPC William Scissom made Mar 26 at 2015 3:55 PM

SPC William Scissom — Thu, 26 Mar 2015 15:55:41 -0400

I am opposed to mandatory anything as I believe in freedom, however I am amazed that anyone would take this topic seriously. Even if the president did try to pass a law that requires all Americans to vote it would never even get out of committee, I doubt they would even read the bill. However even if it did this congress like all of the congresses under Obama would do anything they could to stop it. I mean the man couldn't get the affordable health care act through congress without the republican opposition forcing the mandatory insurance clause, and they did whatever it took to get their way including shutting down the government and failing to pay the military. Now the whole topic of forced voting is simply unrealistic and is most likely a reply to the Supreme Court striking down the voters rights act and the congressional leadership gerrymandering in an obvious effort to steal congressional seats for the right that couldn't be won on merit. I know I know only the republicans care about the military right? Does anyone else remember when we had a republican president and republican controlled house and senate? Two wars, more than a few missed paydays, a secret prison, the patriot act (which stole the freedom we were fighting for), almost no rations or ammo on the front line, and absolutely no armor. Now I'm not saying Obama isn't a huge disappointment all I'm saying is he's not the only person in D.C. that should be unemployed. I can think of at least 535 others that should all resign in disgrace.

Response by SPC Donald Tribble made Mar 26 at 2015 4:05 PM

SPC Donald Tribble — Thu, 26 Mar 2015 16:05:03 -0400

No, people should decide whether or not they want to participate in their government, what I would love to see is a voting option along the lines of none of the above, if that choice wins then all new candidates are selected to run until there's a winner (yeah I know it's a pipe dream)

Response by Cpl Anthony Pearson made Mar 26 at 2015 4:09 PM

Cpl Anthony Pearson — Thu, 26 Mar 2015 16:09:39 -0400

I am surprised that ANYONE thinks this is too far fetched for even Obama to consider.

Really?!?

THAT surprises me.

Response by SGT Ryan Harris made Mar 26 at 2015 4:10 PM

SGT Ryan Harris — Thu, 26 Mar 2015 16:10:08 -0400

Obama needs to leave well enough alone.
he has already disgraced our country enough.
why doesn't he just come out and say he is a camel jockey lover.

Response by SGT Rick Ash made Mar 26 at 2015 6:55 PM

SGT Rick Ash — Thu, 26 Mar 2015 18:55:10 -0400

Totally opposed to this. It will lead to voter ID cards and Obama will have us all in a database.

Response by MAJ Robert (Bob) Petrarca made Mar 26 at 2015 9:26 PM

MAJ Robert (Bob) Petrarca — Thu, 26 Mar 2015 21:26:12 -0400

This is not Soviet Union, comrade! Then again it ain't the old USA either. Voting is a right and privilege, Why some choose not to exercise that right is beyond me.

Response by SPC Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 26 at 2015 9:59 PM

SPC Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 26 Mar 2015 21:59:55 -0400

This is completely unconstitutional and a threat to the very foundation of our nation. If this doesn't deeply disturb people then we have gone to far and do not deserve the liberty we have paid so much for.

Response by SrA Erin Hood made Mar 26 at 2015 10:05 PM

SrA Erin Hood — Thu, 26 Mar 2015 22:05:59 -0400

It doesn't grab me.

Compulsory voting? We don't have compulsory service, so why?

Let's face it, voting is a farce.

The answer is a direct democracy by qualified participants.

Elections do not matter because SELECTION is what matters.

I'm happy to answer questions on this topic.

Response by SGM Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 26 at 2015 11:23 PM

SGM Private RallyPoint Member — Thu, 26 Mar 2015 23:23:20 -0400

Forced voting goes against everything we as a nation stand for. Alternative means and encouragement of voting is a different thing.

Should people be allowed to vote electronically/remotely, probably. We need to evolve the process as technology allows. Why wouldn't we want more people to participate in the democratic process? Does it need strict controls to ensure no fraud is involved, absolutely.

Response by PO1 Michael Phipps made Mar 26 at 2015 11:35 PM

PO1 Michael Phipps — Thu, 26 Mar 2015 23:35:48 -0400

Not forced, but if you register and don't vote within 4 years your registration no longer applies. And if you only vote every 4 years for President in November, please stay home. You need to be involved in every selection period, especially at the lowest, most local level, as they have more power over you than any president is supposed to have under the Constitution. The founders didn't want a big, centralized government. They wanted decentralized, more local government that is more answerable to the people. That's what we should ALL want.

Response by SGT Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 27 at 2015 12:15 AM

SGT Private RallyPoint Member — Fri, 27 Mar 2015 00:15:50 -0400

It is an obligation to participate in a democracy.

Response by SGT Patrick Soule made Mar 27 at 2015 2:04 AM

SGT Patrick Soule — Fri, 27 Mar 2015 02:04:04 -0400

Our Kenyan president (purposely not capitalized) is a farce, joke, failure, embarrassment, danger, useful idiot.

Response by SGT Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 27 at 2015 9:58 AM

SGT Private RallyPoint Member — Fri, 27 Mar 2015 09:58:55 -0400

It would require someone getting close enough with a gun, if they made it that far, to force me to vote.

Response by PFC Stephen Eric Serati made Mar 27 at 2015 11:16 AM

PFC Stephen Eric Serati — Fri, 27 Mar 2015 11:16:13 -0400

I watched the speech,wat I got from it was that some other countries mandate Citizens vote,and that there is better voting in some war torn countries.I took it as if we had 60%or more in all of our elections,federal,state,local,that it would change our politcal landscape,and benefit the majority,not just the minority.I didnt hear him say he was going to mandate it

Response by PO1 Henry Sherrill made Mar 27 at 2015 1:38 PM

PO1 Henry Sherrill — Fri, 27 Mar 2015 13:38:48 -0400

This coming from a man that missed over 350 votes while a senator. Talk about hypocritical.

Response by SFC Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 27 at 2015 7:44 PM

SFC Private RallyPoint Member — Fri, 27 Mar 2015 19:44:14 -0400

What is the original, full context of what the POTUS said about this?

Response by MSgt Aaron Brite made Mar 27 at 2015 7:45 PM

MSgt Aaron Brite — Fri, 27 Mar 2015 19:45:51 -0400

So long as my favorite candidate is listed I am good. I vote: NONE OF THE ABOVE

Response by SCPO Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 27 at 2015 8:54 PM

SCPO Private RallyPoint Member — Fri, 27 Mar 2015 20:54:18 -0400

Although I am opposed to this, it is condescending and downright disrespectful to refer to the President of the United States as "illustrious". Just pointing that out.

Response by SSG Private RallyPoint Member made Mar 30 at 2015 7:14 PM

SSG Private RallyPoint Member — Mon, 30 Mar 2015 19:14:31 -0400

Hell! As it stands now, our votes don't count as the 'powers that be' are going to 'elect' whomever is going to do their bidding is who they're going to 'plant' in office.

Call me a tin foil hat wearing, conspiracy theory kook. But do your own diligent research with an open mind and make your own decision.

I know poop when I smell it.

Response by MSgt Steve Miller made Apr 5 at 2015 8:42 PM

MSgt Steve Miller — Sun, 05 Apr 2015 20:42:08 -0400

That might just be against the constitution of the United States!!!!

Response by TSgt Kenneth Ellis made Jun 1 at 2015 11:14 AM

TSgt Kenneth Ellis — Mon, 01 Jun 2015 11:14:18 -0400

We have enough problems with the low information voters already. In the last election Obama received 100 percent of the votes. Dictators only get 99 percent. And I can't quote which counties. I saw it in the News.

Response by SPC Chris Early made Jun 5 at 2015 6:53 AM

SPC Chris Early — Fri, 05 Jun 2015 06:53:10 -0400

our government in my opinion is slowly taking our rights away, and telling us its for our own good. Now what does that sound like to you.

Response by LCpl Mark Lefler made Jun 30 at 2015 10:57 PM

LCpl Mark Lefler — Tue, 30 Jun 2015 22:57:29 -0400

All eligible Americans should vote, thats just respect to our country and our military.

Response by SSG Sean Gallagher made Jul 9 at 2015 7:56 PM

SSG Sean Gallagher — Thu, 09 Jul 2015 19:56:37 -0400

He's such an ass.

Response by SGT William Howell made Jul 27 at 2015 2:08 PM

SGT William Howell — Mon, 27 Jul 2015 14:08:59 -0400

With the last 3 elections I felt like I was forced to vote..for who sucked less.

Response by AA James Konkel made Nov 10 at 2022 9:37 AM

AA James Konkel — Thu, 10 Nov 2022 09:37:33 -0500

Power to much

Response by SGT Private RallyPoint Member made Nov 11 at 2022 3:16 PM

SGT Private RallyPoint Member — Fri, 11 Nov 2022 15:16:33 -0500

no vote... no bitching... simple as that.