Should we let uncleared refugees just come in to our country, or should we check them out first? Anatomy of the terror threat.

MSG Private RallyPoint Member — Wed, 22 Jun 2016 20:46:11 -0400

Response by Capt Tom Brown made Jun 22 at 2016 9:07 PM

Capt Tom Brown — Wed, 22 Jun 2016 21:07:33 -0400

MSG Private RallyPoint Member I feel it is a lot more likely that terrorist-types could tag along with all the refugees from Syria, etc which have flooded Europe and which the President says we will admit 10,000 ourselves in 2016 alone. From what I read even the current vetting process used for legitimate refugees takes 12-18 months. If that is so and the process began back in January, how could 10,000 possibly be screened and vetted by the end of 2016? No one knows. I also read that the same or similar process was used on the San Bernardino shooter's wife. After all she was the wife of an American citizen, so that made her ok. When these tag-along terrorists start popping up at sometime in the future who is going to fall on their sword and take responsibility for it? No one.

Response by Cpl Justin Goolsby made Jun 22 at 2016 9:08 PM

Cpl Justin Goolsby — Wed, 22 Jun 2016 21:08:54 -0400

Is that a serious question... of course they shouldn't be allowed in.

Response by Capt Private RallyPoint Member made Jun 22 at 2016 9:10 PM

Capt Private RallyPoint Member — Wed, 22 Jun 2016 21:10:11 -0400

I think everyone on the "immigration" bandwagon should be required to visit Ellis Island and learn what immigration was in its hey day.

Response by SrA Edward Vong made Jun 22 at 2016 9:23 PM

SrA Edward Vong — Wed, 22 Jun 2016 21:23:49 -0400

Every refugee that comes into the US needs to be processed just like every other immigrant. I won't get into the discussion of illegal immigrants or undocumented workers because that is another topic entirely.

Response by SGM Erik Marquez made Jun 22 at 2016 9:26 PM

SGM Erik Marquez — Wed, 22 Jun 2016 21:26:18 -0400

No, but then nobody in apparent authority is asking me

Response by SFC Troy Tomlinson made Jun 22 at 2016 11:05 PM

SFC Troy Tomlinson — Wed, 22 Jun 2016 23:05:10 -0400

They have to be vetted, if we can't vet them, we shouldn't let them in. We have to look out for our children and grandchildren, ect first.

Response by PO1 Brian Austin made Jun 23 at 2016 12:08 AM

PO1 Brian Austin — Thu, 23 Jun 2016 00:08:30 -0400

No. We need an EXTENSIVE vetting process. And an even more stringent vetting process for military-age males.

If you don't make it through the vetting process, too bad, try going somewhere else.

Response by PV2 Glen Lewis made May 20 at 2017 5:20 PM

PV2 Glen Lewis — Sat, 20 May 2017 17:20:04 -0400

No we shouldn't.