If tattoos are not visible in dress/duty uniform how is it they "detract from military appearance" I can see how an argument against neck, hand and face tattoos can be made and I agree to an extent but I can not understand how something that can only be seen in PTs or civilian attire causes and detriment to the force. Please someone smarter than me explain this to me.
Posted 8 y ago
This is a duplicate discussion and the contents have been merged with the original discussion. Click below to see more on this topic...
What is the current tattoo policy? What are your thoughts on the new policy?
Read This Next