What 2016 election candidate should a veteran or veteran organization vote for or endorse?

SN Jeff Powell — Mon, 01 Feb 2016 11:07:51 -0500

Response by Sgt Private RallyPoint Member made Feb 1 at 2016 11:11 AM

Sgt Private RallyPoint Member — Mon, 01 Feb 2016 11:11:11 -0500

The candidate that will do the most to keep America a strong and safe nation.

Response by SSG Carlos Madden made Feb 1 at 2016 11:16 AM

SSG Carlos Madden — Mon, 01 Feb 2016 11:16:31 -0500

There's many articles out there tracking the candidates and their plans regarding veterans. This is just one. Please take a look around and research these people before we cast our votes!
http://taskandpurpose.com/heres-2016-presidential-candidates-stand-veterans-issues/

Here’s Where The 2016 Presidential Candidates Stand On Veterans Issues

Task & Purpose ranks the 2016 presidential candidates on their veterans' policies.

Response by Capt Walter Miller made Feb 1 at 2016 11:40 AM

Capt Walter Miller — Mon, 01 Feb 2016 11:40:29 -0500

https://www.webb2016.com/ Jumpin' Jiminy.

Webb 2016

Leadership You Can Trust

Response by Capt Walter Miller made Feb 1 at 2016 11:50 AM

Capt Walter Miller — Mon, 01 Feb 2016 11:50:55 -0500

Response by MSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Feb 1 at 2016 11:58 AM

MSgt Private RallyPoint Member — Mon, 01 Feb 2016 11:58:56 -0500

The one that has the best interest of the nation in mind and does not bend to the will of special interest groups 'like veterans" just to get votes. I'm sorry I know it hurts but we need someone in place who is worried about everyone not just those of us who are organized.

Response by PV2 Scott Goodpasture made Feb 1 at 2016 1:00 PM

PV2 Scott Goodpasture — Mon, 01 Feb 2016 13:00:14 -0500

Jim Webb

Response by LCDR Private RallyPoint Member made Feb 1 at 2016 4:09 PM

LCDR Private RallyPoint Member — Mon, 01 Feb 2016 16:09:35 -0500

Frankly, if we're looking only at how a candidate would support veterans' issues...we're being myopic. If a candidate wants to increase benefits to veterans, I want them to tell me how they'll fund it. If a candidate wants to increase the size of the military, I want them to tell me how they'll fund it, and what specific reasons justify it. If a candidate will take us to, or keep us from a war...I want to know what the pros and cons are, and how that will shape their future foreign policy. Finally, I won't for vote for someone whose personal views I do not consider positive and moral just because they offer to dole out more cash...neither will I abstain from voting for someone who does have those principles just because they won't hand more out.

Response by SSG Gerhard S. made Feb 1 at 2016 7:28 PM

SSG Gerhard S. — Mon, 01 Feb 2016 19:28:40 -0500

Whomever is the Libertarian Candidate, as they will actually take seriously, their oath to support and defend the Constitution, as we in the military do, but that very few of those in the RepubliCrat party give a second thought to.

Response by Cpl Glynis Sakowicz made Feb 2 at 2016 5:09 AM

Cpl Glynis Sakowicz — Tue, 02 Feb 2016 05:09:20 -0500

Whatever a veteran believes is foremost in their view... security, the nation's path in the future, whatever their view, is where they will give their support.
We Veterans are a mixed lot, though I have noticed that most of us, because of our past service, and the probability of our children following our lead and becoming military as well, we seem to lean towards more conservative views. I don't think it is because we are all conservative, but I do believe that our view of the world itself is a great deal broader than most Americans. We have SEEN what is on the 'other side' and though we are not against giving a helping hand to those who truly need it, we, as a group, see where this country COULD be heading, and that bothers us.
Whoever we vote for, we are, its said, only about one percent of Americans so I doubt if us throwing our 'weight' behind a single person will make a difference.

Response by SSG Sandra Sutherland made Feb 2 at 2016 7:35 AM

SSG Sandra Sutherland — Tue, 02 Feb 2016 07:35:40 -0500

This is one that you need to research and decide for yourself. In all honesty, I don't feel that any are fully supporting us. I'm 65 years old, 100% disabled and suddenly part is my disability is being reduced, not increased or remaining the same. Many of our politicians today have never served and don't care about those of us who have. You have to do what your conscience and heart lead you to do.

Response by SP6 Ron W. made Feb 2 at 2016 8:05 AM

SP6 Ron W. — Tue, 02 Feb 2016 08:05:24 -0500

I'm supporting Rubio. Am not proselytizing here for him.

Response by CW3 Jim Norris made Feb 2 at 2016 10:07 AM

CW3 Jim Norris — Tue, 02 Feb 2016 10:07:18 -0500

I am a Cruz guy. I like his Constitutional governance model. I want the EPA to get out of the way business, the federal department of education out of the way of effective education reform at the local level. He can and will roll back ObamaCare, executive orders stopping deportation of illegal aliens, build an effective southern border.

Response by Lt Col Mark DeVore made Feb 2 at 2016 10:53 AM

Lt Col Mark DeVore — Tue, 02 Feb 2016 10:53:49 -0500

Anyone but Hillary. She had the military in the WH under Bill wear civvies.

Response by MCPO Hans Brakob made Feb 2 at 2016 9:51 PM

MCPO Hans Brakob — Tue, 02 Feb 2016 21:51:54 -0500

None of the current candidates meet my minimum requirements to lead our Nation.

Response by PO3 David Fries made Feb 4 at 2016 5:32 PM

PO3 David Fries — Thu, 04 Feb 2016 17:32:59 -0500

Organization? None of the above. Veteran? Whoever they want to vote for.

Response by 1SG Harold Piet made Feb 9 at 2016 6:34 AM

1SG Harold Piet — Tue, 09 Feb 2016 06:34:36 -0500

This is a pretty good site to see how you compare with the candidates. https://www.isidewith.com/political-quiz I say compare your values with that of the candidates and vote for the one that come closest to what you value most. None will match exactly. I compare which one best compare to what the bible , the constitution and the bill of rights says to me. That is the one I want to lead our country. Each has to make their own choice.

How Republican vs Democrat are you?

This short test can tell exactly where you align.

Response by PO1 Steve Marshall made Feb 9 at 2016 8:18 AM

PO1 Steve Marshall — Tue, 09 Feb 2016 08:18:48 -0500

Ted Cruz

Response by SFC Private RallyPoint Member made Feb 9 at 2016 10:09 AM

SFC Private RallyPoint Member — Tue, 09 Feb 2016 10:09:21 -0500

Bernie Sanders !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Response by CPT Ethan Nelson made Feb 9 at 2016 10:20 AM

CPT Ethan Nelson — Tue, 09 Feb 2016 10:20:00 -0500

You should vote for the candidate whos platform most aligns with your own values, socially and economically. As far as candidates who support things such as veteran benefits, most GOP candidates claim to have veteran's interests in mind. This shouldn't be confused with candidates who want to expand the military in general. It's my experience that military expansion is usually a rallying cry that candidates use to attract the military vote. When you appeal to the military voter you are not just attracting soldiers, you are also attracting their friends, family, etc. The issue that I find most concerning is that candidates claim to want to "expand the military" while also expressing a desire to "cut social spending". What voters often overlook when they hear this that organizations such as Veterans Affairs are considered social spending. Personally, I feel that taking care of the guys who have served and need help/ assistance is more important than expanding the size of a military that can be inefficient at times. I love the military and will continue to serve as long as they will have me. In contrast it is important to see through platforms that contradict themselves. Let me know if you get any in depth information regarding specific candidates that may not be mainstream.

Response by Sgt James TerHark made Feb 9 at 2016 10:51 AM

Sgt James TerHark — Tue, 09 Feb 2016 10:51:08 -0500

The one that will make America strong again and have the military's back!

Response by CWO2 Shelby DuBois made Feb 9 at 2016 10:55 AM

CWO2 Shelby DuBois — Tue, 09 Feb 2016 10:55:42 -0500

You cannot control what happens once they are sworn in... obviously. So you have to go with your gut and decide who has the morality, ethics and fortitude to do what is right for the Country..not for a party... not for group. Someone who believes in the United States..its people and its possibilities.

Response by SPC Steven Depuy made Feb 9 at 2016 11:07 AM

SPC Steven Depuy — Tue, 09 Feb 2016 11:07:40 -0500

I don't think organizations should tell people who to vote for. You have to take the time to learn the truth about people, not take your information from TV commercials, and political smear campaigns. If all we care about are our personal issues, what makes us any different from every other group or organization trying to bleed dollars from the treasury every year. For the past 40 years, politicians have bought their offices with the funds from the US Treasury, and we line up to cast votes for the one who gives us the most shit. Who is going to be the best for the country, our kids, our grandchildren, who is going to heal the race war that has been restarted in the name of politics. Thats what will determine who I would vote for. But since you can't vote in my state in the primary unless you belong to a party, I guess I will have to wait and see what choices the rest of the country leaves me with.

Response by PO2 Gerry Tandberg made Feb 9 at 2016 11:17 AM

PO2 Gerry Tandberg — Tue, 09 Feb 2016 11:17:42 -0500

I might be tempted to vote for a POTUS candidate who served in the military. Unfortunately, as of today there are none. That was easy! So now all I need to concentrate on is a POTUS candidate who appears to cherished the US Constitution over the others. I liked Huckabee, Kasich, Carson, Forina and Paul. However, It's likely going to boil down to Trump, Cruz, Rubio, and Christie. Do I have a favorite? Not yet. Oh, I didn't forget Sanders or Clinton. They simply are not on list of viable candidates. It's interesting to note we have no idea how either of these candidates will address military spending and how they will address the current bloated budget. LCDR Gillespie's comments are worth noting.

Response by PO2 Mike Rano made Feb 9 at 2016 11:21 AM

PO2 Mike Rano — Tue, 09 Feb 2016 11:21:38 -0500

I would think that it would be a huge benefit for and elected president too have served in any branch of the military . He/she would then have a greater insight into what serving this country is all about. The deployments , separation from family. So many subtle as well as harsh compared to the life you know as a civilian . I know a member of the armed services would feel a whole lot better for a standing president was a VETERAN. Thank You HM2 M.RANO

Response by CPT Kevin Laczko made Feb 9 at 2016 12:00 PM

CPT Kevin Laczko — Tue, 09 Feb 2016 12:00:19 -0500

Military experience gives us a great perspective on leadership which I believe is the single most essential metric for selecting a Presidential candidate. Yes, the candidate's agenda matters, but not as much as their leadership & character. If you've served for any length of time you've served under good leaders & bad so you know quite well the difference. I will make my selection come election day the same way I have since I first joined the Army, I will vote for the person I believe can & will make the tough calls in the most critical moments of their Presidency. It rises & falls on leadership.

Response by MSgt Jim Bain made Feb 9 at 2016 12:05 PM

MSgt Jim Bain — Tue, 09 Feb 2016 12:05:31 -0500

None of the people running for President have any military background, so it's really your best guess. I personally would go for the one who at least seems to support veteran's...their health issues, pensions, etc.! I would also be strongly in favor of one who would build our up our Armed Forces, instead of making stupid cuts, .....but that aside, lets get someone in there who will take care of our troops not just for the short, but for the long haul, and lets not forget them, as regrettably as past administrations have done!!!

Response by Cpl William Domenz made Feb 9 at 2016 12:13 PM

Cpl William Domenz — Tue, 09 Feb 2016 12:13:22 -0500

General James Mattis

Response by SFC Rich Bright made Feb 9 at 2016 12:27 PM

SFC Rich Bright — Tue, 09 Feb 2016 12:27:32 -0500

Not sure who will really support the military better. They all claim to care- But after elected, who will follow through? I do know this, during the 26 years of service, I got better raises under Republicans then I got under Democrats. And as for new equipment, Obama and Clinton used the military, but to my reearch funded very little in the way of new platforms.

Response by SGT Vaughan Guenley made Feb 9 at 2016 12:43 PM

SGT Vaughan Guenley — Tue, 09 Feb 2016 12:43:51 -0500

Seriously? Have you listened to the republican candidates, any of them? I've never seen such an unstable group in my lifetime. These characters are willing to toss our beloved Constitution out the door in their quest to take us backwards several decades. There isn't one among them that I would happily follow as my Commander in Chief. It looks like its either Clinton or Sanders, who will take the oath with troops spread all around the world, many in combat zones. My other consideration is the fact that the next President will seat at least two Supreme Court Justices, and we don't need any more right wing ideologues on our court.

Response by LCpl Private RallyPoint Member made Feb 9 at 2016 1:15 PM

LCpl Private RallyPoint Member — Tue, 09 Feb 2016 13:15:01 -0500

hopefully one that can believed to support the militry

Response by SGT Don Griffith made Feb 9 at 2016 1:25 PM

SGT Don Griffith — Tue, 09 Feb 2016 13:25:58 -0500

None. The military, and any unit type should leave politics, religion, race at home. An endorsement should never happen. Don't ask yourself who you would like as Commander-in-Chief. Ask yourself who would be the best leader for the country. And then leave that alone within any unit setting.

Response by PO1 Private RallyPoint Member made Feb 9 at 2016 2:02 PM

PO1 Private RallyPoint Member — Tue, 09 Feb 2016 14:02:47 -0500

Veterans organizations should never be in the business of endorsing political candidates, nor should your dues, funds, or contributions ever be used to support them or their campaigns. Many of these organizations are non-profit 501.3(c) charitable organizations which have prohibitions regarding politics and money. This is from the IRS' webpage: https://www.irs.gov/uac/Election-Year-Activities-and-the-Prohibition-on-Political-Campaign-Intervention-for-Section-501(c)(3)-Organizations

Election Year Activities and the Prohibition on Political Campaign Intervention for Section...

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is releasing this fact sheet to provide information to help section 501(c)(3) organizations stay in compliance with the federal tax law. Many of the types of political intervention activities addressed in the fact sheet were those that came under scrutiny during the 2004 election cycle. The contents reflect the IRS interpretation of tax laws enacted by Congress, Treasury regulations, and court decisions. The...

Response by A1C Melissa Jackson made Feb 9 at 2016 2:58 PM

A1C Melissa Jackson — Tue, 09 Feb 2016 14:58:35 -0500

I believe that we should have a leader who will not be "more of the same". I want a leader who will not kow-tow to the frickin rich boys every time they turn around.

There are A NUMBER of issues that need attention in our country. Veteran's issues are important because they are part of the cost of war- especially prolonged and seemingly endless war. I think one party (hardly a veteran among em) is delighted with the thought of maintaining perpetual war to enrich the military industrial complex. Then they want to abandon those who gave a measure of blood and flesh for it. Unacceptable. The American public needs to know that if war mongering is going to be the way we use our precious resource of youth- then there are BIG costs associated. They need to know that military service, and combat in general CHANGES a person. I can effect their productivity over a lifetime. It can leave parent-less children. It can lead to the loss of funds for things they feel are important for their daily lives- such as roads, bridges, rail projects, other public works projects that will improve ALL our lives and provide good jobs for the veterans who are finally home. There are plenty of infrastructure jobs that could rebuild the middle class and improve our country to the point we will be in line with the rest of the first world in public infrastructure.

Instead of looking for a candidate who will continue to perpetually spend OBSCENE numbers of dollars on very expensive weapons upgrades and standing armies we do not really need for the defense of the homeland- why don't we switch gears and look for a candidate that is more interested in Joe on the street having quality living for his family? Better infrastructure would support better maneuverability and logistics SHOULD there be an attack on the homeland. Better educated youth will produce a higher quality cadre of scientists and engineers to innovate and create. As you can see- these changes would influence a better defense in the long run by just investing in our PEOPLE.

There is so much further I can say in this subject, but I won't. I just think that the old formula is not working. Let's try something else.

Response by PFC Donnie Harold Harris made Feb 9 at 2016 4:23 PM

PFC Donnie Harold Harris — Tue, 09 Feb 2016 16:23:02 -0500

I will vote for anyone once.

Response by PVT Alejandro Rivera made Feb 9 at 2016 4:41 PM

PVT Alejandro Rivera — Tue, 09 Feb 2016 16:41:07 -0500

None, of all this candidates none has served in the military, yet all give lip service to the military and once elected can care less until next election,the same goes for immigration,social security,and health care,once elected they forget and cannot keep promises.

Response by SSgt Dale Darrough made Feb 9 at 2016 7:39 PM

SSgt Dale Darrough — Tue, 09 Feb 2016 19:39:39 -0500

Donald Trump. He is acutely aware of the condition of our current military, both equipment and personnel and how the fool in the White House has decreased the ships, aircraft and personnel to levels before the second world war. He will absolutely get our military back up to where it should be, and take much better care of both active duty and retired individuals. Not only that, he will stop third rate countries from disrespecting us, and doing whatever they want like they are doing now. He will close the borders, reduce or eliminate the trade deficit, and create an economy all of us will benefit from.

Response by SPC Ronald Hanson made Feb 10 at 2016 5:52 AM

SPC Ronald Hanson — Wed, 10 Feb 2016 05:52:33 -0500

I actually like Trump, he didnt need to run for office, he actually feels like our nation is falling apart and he wants to fix it, Yes would be nice for someone to take care of the military, and vets but we need someone who will take care of America in general. I think that Trump will do that , he knows business and he even said he will get great advisers for the other stuff, which I think he will listen and take to heart what they say, Not like the Democrats they only want to hear what they want to hear... also Trump is not being controlled by the big donors, so he can do what he needs to do and not what they tell him to do.

Response by SFC Private RallyPoint Member made Feb 10 at 2016 10:06 AM

SFC Private RallyPoint Member — Wed, 10 Feb 2016 10:06:35 -0500

Like CW3 Jim Norris, I like Cruz. Cpl Glynis Sakowicz did an excellent job of explaining selfless service that the military is known for; and how we can’t look at our own selfish needs when we look at the overall health of our country.

I like Cruz because I see him playing by the rules (our constitution) and being a person to make difficult choices for the overall good of our country. Our country needs to reaffirm what “Rights” are, and what “entitlements” are… and that entitlements are OK as long as we can afford them. When we can’t pay for the entitlements they have to be eliminated or our country goes bankrupt, or we become a socialist/communist country like most of the rest of the world, and look where their standard of living is. The federal government is assuming too much power from the states that they are not allowed to (even with the states permission), congress isn’t stopping it, and the courts aren’t stopping it. It’s not going to end pretty.

Let’s critique the exercise: Trump may, or may not be a good business man, but he’s a loose cannon and we don’t know where he’ll lead. Everyone in the military understands Clinton should be in jail for her handling of classified material. Sanders can’t take the Oath of Office because he “shouldn’t” take an oath to protect and preserve the Constitution of the United States. Rubio’s stance on immigration is appalling: Make no mistake about it, all the immigrants going into Europe right now is the largest successful invasion since World War 2. If we don’t get a handle on all the illegals in our country, get them out, and then allow immigration to occur under the current laws that protect our country, we will then lose our country. Currently all political sides choose not to enforce our immigration laws for their own selfish purposes, that’s why the process isn’t working, not because it’s broke. Virtually all the other candidates are in bed with big business and/or special interest groups… thus the saying: politics make strange bedfellows.

It’s been years since I went on a rant like this, I don’t know why I did now, but I do feel better. I hope I didn’t bore you too much.

Response by SPC Christopher Morehouse made Feb 10 at 2016 11:52 AM

SPC Christopher Morehouse — Wed, 10 Feb 2016 11:52:24 -0500

Personally I like Ted Cruz. So far he seems to be the one with the most integrity, and strictest interpretation and application to the constitution. Things that are important to me both personally and as a Veteran.

Response by SFC Private RallyPoint Member made Feb 10 at 2016 2:26 PM

SFC Private RallyPoint Member — Wed, 10 Feb 2016 14:26:04 -0500

How about the one who will stand strong for the people he represents, not those who want to come here but not be part of what we are. They want to change what was the best country in the world to a socialist dump. Capitalism isn't perfect, but it gives those with desire and ambition the opputunity to succeed. Socialism brings everyone down to equal miserable status, unless your part of the ruling class. All the give aways of socialism just make people lazy and less productive. See what candidate wants to help veterans over refugees ! Pretty simple really.

Response by PO1 Michael Garrett made Feb 10 at 2016 9:38 PM

PO1 Michael Garrett — Wed, 10 Feb 2016 21:38:55 -0500

SN Powell. This is a loaded question-particularly for those who are still in the military and are not allowed to freely speak their political views-lest they get in trouble with their superiors. I do not mention whom I will support, since I have made that and other views of mine known elsewhere. I will ask you though what do you feel is the purpose of the military-particularly the US Navy? Do you feel a true sense of patriotism for this country? Do you like the challenges of being a US Sailor? How do you feel about the current operations tempo of the Navy? How is/was the morale with the unit you were stationed (with)?
The Navy, along with the other service branches has had catchy slogans in order to attract quality recruits. Our current one-"a global force for good," implies that we will act not necessarily for the benefit of the United States but as a world police-force if the situation calls for it. Was this what our Navy was created for in 1797?
I joined back in 1988, the last year of Regan's term in office. Back then we had a total of about 560+ ships. By the time I left the Navy after my first hitch, we launched the USS Arleigh Burke and the USS Wasp, both were part of the next generation of warships that would take us into the next millennium. Skip ahead a few years and the fleet that once safe-guarded the world was now a mere shell of itself. Our aircraft carriers were being used to ferry troops while our sailors were going into inner-city ghettos to help the needy. Also during this time, terrorism was becoming a major concern but our leadership continued to ignore its rise. We found out painfully on Sept, 11, 2001, the price of complacency and neglect. The Cold War may have ended on that date but it was replaced by terrorists threatening to return the world to the Dark Ages.
The next 8 years were spent hunting Al Qaeda world-wide in conjunction with other nations who had an interest in seeing terrorism destroyed. Al Qaeda was whittled down and near defeat when a new administration took over. Since that time, Al Qaeda has rebuilt, rearmed, spread. As ruthless and cunning as they are, a new are more fearsome enemy has taken hold in the Middle East.
Yet our leaders still ignore the danger that is now within our own borders.
This very brief history lesson sums up my feelings for our military. I have seen it at its greatest, when the military was held in high esteem and people eagerly joined the ranks to serve. I have seen it when it was ignored by many and treated with contempt by others.
I want someone who understands what the purpose of our military is for. Someone who will resist the social engineering of our military. Ultimately our military is the first-line guardian of our Constitution. We took the oath (as did everyone who ever ran for public office) to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States.

Response by PO3 Ted Tarver made Feb 11 at 2016 2:25 PM

PO3 Ted Tarver — Thu, 11 Feb 2016 14:25:47 -0500

The most important criteria for me is a candidate who believe that our inalienable rights come from God and not the government, and has, thorough actions and not words, supported and defended the Constitution of these United States. The only candidate who meets these requirements, based on my extensive background research, is Ted Cruz.

Response by Sgt Sherry Taylor-Bruce made Feb 11 at 2016 5:00 PM

Sgt Sherry Taylor-Bruce — Thu, 11 Feb 2016 17:00:49 -0500

I've done my homework on this one. The candidate that speaks most on the subject of military, taxes and healthcare is Ben Carson. He wants to defund planned parenthood and overhaul our health care system with subsidised flex spending accounts. I believe he would want to reduce wasteful spending in the military as well. His campaign manager is a retired General. I sent a message to request his people set up a Q&A on Rally Point, but I'm just one voice.

Response by PO2 Alan Blair made Feb 16 at 2016 10:16 AM

PO2 Alan Blair — Tue, 16 Feb 2016 10:16:40 -0500

I don't like to sound negative, but between simply paying more attention, and having worked with some influential people in Washington, my worst fears were realized.
In 2008 when Romney and Ron Paul were running, Ron Paul was not even mentioned by the media in the last 6 months leading up to the RNC in Tampa. Why? Because he was not an "Establishment Candidate". In other words, he was not on board with the agenda... and believe me when I say, there is only one agenda! Partisanship is a farce!
Ron Paul was running a campaign so strong that he was threatening the candidacy of Romney (a true establishment candidate). Ron Paul was told not to come to the RNC, because they'd not let him in... another law broken. He still showed up and marched on the RNC with thousands of his followers. But you never saw that in the news, did you?.
Currently, we have a President who continues to break the law, yet no one demands that anything is done! The powers that be no longer care about what we think, as they are now too powerful for us to do anything about it... so they think.
And what about Hillary Clinton? She's a criminal to say the least! But she will be President... because the establishment will put her in office. So, let me ask you this... Do you really think that your vote means anything? If it did, would a known criminal and liar like Hillary even run?
I'm sorry, brothers and sisters for sharing such painful yet truthful words... but I'd rather live pain knowing the truth, than to live a lie. God bless America! May He save us from the tyranny that has become so common to us.

Response by PO2 Gerry Tandberg made Feb 18 at 2016 1:16 PM

PO2 Gerry Tandberg — Thu, 18 Feb 2016 13:16:02 -0500

If your still active military be very careful on how you respond. I've been separated from the military for many years, so here's my take. I have a favorite, but I'm waiting on dialog from each candidate how they specifically intend on address the many issues and problem our nation faces.
On principle and ethics: Ben Carson
On experience and ethics: John Kasich
On experience in government: Jeb Bush
On curb appeal: Marco Rubio
On Constitutional Law and ethics: Ted Cruz
On chutzpah and telling the people what they want to hear: Donald Trump
Any of the above would make a far better POTUS than Obama, and they are head and shoulders a better choice over Sanders/Clinton, whom are weak when it comes to supporting a strong military; not to mention a strong economy. Neither can't wait to get the chance to spend your tax dollars. Sanders has never held a decent job in his life until he became Mayor of Burlington in 1981 serving for eight years. He became a Vermont Senator in 2006. As a lifelong socialist it is hard to understand how he has made it this far. However, Vermont seems to elect left leaning politicians.
Now Hillary on the other hand is a liar that can not be out-done in that category by anyone...even Obama. She has as much chutzpah as Trump...maybe more. How she manages her high pole numbers is a mystery to me and many others given her role in Benghazi. I personally would not serve in the military under a President Hillary Clinton under any circumtances.

Response by TSgt Private RallyPoint Member made Feb 28 at 2016 3:01 PM

TSgt Private RallyPoint Member — Sun, 28 Feb 2016 15:01:43 -0500

As a vet, I, personally, would NEVER tell a fellow American Citizen who he/she should vote for. Nor will I formally endorse any candidate for office. I will tell you who I will vote for and why, but YOU need to do your own research and vote for the candidate the most closely matches your personal beliefs. I don't care who you vote for, just be an INFORMED voter.

Response by CPO Joel Bentley made Mar 4 at 2016 4:20 AM

CPO Joel Bentley — Fri, 04 Mar 2016 04:20:10 -0500

They are all Crooks, but I must vote for Donald Trump because I do believe he will help Veterans.

Response by MSgt Jim Bain made Mar 4 at 2016 12:40 PM

MSgt Jim Bain — Fri, 04 Mar 2016 12:40:41 -0500

None.... express your own opinion, feel free to do that, but for a veteran organization to endorse someone for President of the United States, that's just wrong! Who would decide in the various organizations out there, who to vote for? Old friends by the end of the night, would not be old friends anymore!