Posted on Oct 26, 2022
DOD, VA move to protect post-Dobbs reproductive rights
13K
145
44
31
31
0
In the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in June ending the constitutional right to where and when pregnant people can access abortion health care, the U.S. departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs moved to protect service members’ and Veterans’ reproductive rights.
In an Oct. 20 memo, Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III directed the service branches to institute policy changes dealing with issues such as health care privacy rights, support for reproductive health care providers, and access to abortion services and reproductive health education. The directives include:
• Making uniform and lengthening to 20 weeks the time that service members must notify commanders of a pregnancy, except where there are certain occupational health hazards.
• Prohibiting DOD health care providers from notifying or disclosing reproductive health information to commanders. Exceptions include risk of harm to the mission, occupational safety requirements or acute medical conditions.
• Directing commanders to be objective and discrete in addressing reproductive health care issues and to enforce policies against discrimination and retaliation in these contexts.
• Reimbursing fees to DOD health care providers who must get licensed in a different state so they can provide legal and DOD-covered abortion services.
Dobbs could impact thousands of DOD service members and personnel
DOD officials said the directives, based on the recommendations of a multidisciplinary team of experts and service members themselves, took time to formulate.
Many states, however, have moved quickly to implement the June 24 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which permits them to allow, limit or ban access to abortion. As of Oct. 13, the Kaiser Family Foundation’s Abortion Dashboard counted:
• 13 U.S. states in which abortion is illegal.
• Five states in which an abortion ban is temporarily blocked by the courts.
• Seven states in which abortion services are available but limited to 15-22 weeks of pregnancy.
• One state in which abortion is banned after six weeks of pregnancy.
• 24 states and the District of Columbia in which abortion is available.
A recent RAND analysis found that about 80,000 women on active duty — most within child-bearing age — could already or soon live in states where abortion is banned or severely limited.
“This means that 40 percent of active-duty service women in the continental United States will have no or severely restricted access to abortion services where they are stationed,” the September 2022 RAND report said. “These women make up 18 percent of the stateside total active-duty force.”
An additional 81,000 DOD civilians live in states where abortion is or will be prohibited or severely restricted, RAND estimated.
Senators called on DOD to prepare for post-Dobbs landscape
Women are the fastest-growing segment of America’s all-volunteer armed forces, making up around 17% of active-duty personnel, according to RAND.
Before Dobbs came down, eight senators called on Austin and the DOD to prepare for what they rightly predicted would become a patchwork system of abortion access. They said the decision could negatively impact national security and military readiness. It would create “a scenario where servicemembers’ reproductive and health care rights would become dependent on their duty station,” the senators said in a May 12 letter to Austin.
In issuing the latest directives, DOD officials agreed with the need to address this post-Dobbs reality.
“The practical effect of the recent changes is that service members may be forced to travel greater distances, take more time off work, and pay more out-of-pocket expenses to access reproductive health care, all of which have readiness, recruiting and retention implications for America’s armed forces,” said Pentagon Press Secretary Brig. Gen. Pat Ryder in an Oct. 20 media briefing.
In addition to privacy protections and licensure reimbursements, the directives provide travel and transportation resources and time off allowances so service members can access reproductive health care unavailable where they serve.
DOD is also creating contraception education programs to help service members prevent unintended pregnancies. According to RAND’s report, 63.3% of service women with an unintended pregnancy were not using any form of contraception prior to the pregnancy and 32.8% were not using a reliable form of contraception.
DOD’s reproductive health education programs aim to clarify which DOD medical services are available and funded and where service members can go to request reproductive health care. DOD noted that under TRICARE, there are no co-pays for contraception services.
VA in September also clarified that Veterans who are pregnant can receive abortion counseling and abortions in limited cases.
Yet DOD, VA and other federal agencies have limited authority to provide or support abortion-related services under current law. The law bans DOD and VA from using money and facilities for most abortions. Allowable exceptions include if a pregnancy results from rape or incest or would endanger the life of the mother.
Learn more
• DOD’s reproductive rights memo: https://rly.pt/3sRjRWd
• RAND’s “How the Dobbs decision could affect U.S. National Security”: https://rly.pt/3Dy7ft6
• VA’s interim rule on abortion counseling and services: https://rly.pt/3NdBdpA
• VA’s reproductive health benefits page: https://rly.pt/3Der4UH
In an Oct. 20 memo, Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III directed the service branches to institute policy changes dealing with issues such as health care privacy rights, support for reproductive health care providers, and access to abortion services and reproductive health education. The directives include:
• Making uniform and lengthening to 20 weeks the time that service members must notify commanders of a pregnancy, except where there are certain occupational health hazards.
• Prohibiting DOD health care providers from notifying or disclosing reproductive health information to commanders. Exceptions include risk of harm to the mission, occupational safety requirements or acute medical conditions.
• Directing commanders to be objective and discrete in addressing reproductive health care issues and to enforce policies against discrimination and retaliation in these contexts.
• Reimbursing fees to DOD health care providers who must get licensed in a different state so they can provide legal and DOD-covered abortion services.
Dobbs could impact thousands of DOD service members and personnel
DOD officials said the directives, based on the recommendations of a multidisciplinary team of experts and service members themselves, took time to formulate.
Many states, however, have moved quickly to implement the June 24 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which permits them to allow, limit or ban access to abortion. As of Oct. 13, the Kaiser Family Foundation’s Abortion Dashboard counted:
• 13 U.S. states in which abortion is illegal.
• Five states in which an abortion ban is temporarily blocked by the courts.
• Seven states in which abortion services are available but limited to 15-22 weeks of pregnancy.
• One state in which abortion is banned after six weeks of pregnancy.
• 24 states and the District of Columbia in which abortion is available.
A recent RAND analysis found that about 80,000 women on active duty — most within child-bearing age — could already or soon live in states where abortion is banned or severely limited.
“This means that 40 percent of active-duty service women in the continental United States will have no or severely restricted access to abortion services where they are stationed,” the September 2022 RAND report said. “These women make up 18 percent of the stateside total active-duty force.”
An additional 81,000 DOD civilians live in states where abortion is or will be prohibited or severely restricted, RAND estimated.
Senators called on DOD to prepare for post-Dobbs landscape
Women are the fastest-growing segment of America’s all-volunteer armed forces, making up around 17% of active-duty personnel, according to RAND.
Before Dobbs came down, eight senators called on Austin and the DOD to prepare for what they rightly predicted would become a patchwork system of abortion access. They said the decision could negatively impact national security and military readiness. It would create “a scenario where servicemembers’ reproductive and health care rights would become dependent on their duty station,” the senators said in a May 12 letter to Austin.
In issuing the latest directives, DOD officials agreed with the need to address this post-Dobbs reality.
“The practical effect of the recent changes is that service members may be forced to travel greater distances, take more time off work, and pay more out-of-pocket expenses to access reproductive health care, all of which have readiness, recruiting and retention implications for America’s armed forces,” said Pentagon Press Secretary Brig. Gen. Pat Ryder in an Oct. 20 media briefing.
In addition to privacy protections and licensure reimbursements, the directives provide travel and transportation resources and time off allowances so service members can access reproductive health care unavailable where they serve.
DOD is also creating contraception education programs to help service members prevent unintended pregnancies. According to RAND’s report, 63.3% of service women with an unintended pregnancy were not using any form of contraception prior to the pregnancy and 32.8% were not using a reliable form of contraception.
DOD’s reproductive health education programs aim to clarify which DOD medical services are available and funded and where service members can go to request reproductive health care. DOD noted that under TRICARE, there are no co-pays for contraception services.
VA in September also clarified that Veterans who are pregnant can receive abortion counseling and abortions in limited cases.
Yet DOD, VA and other federal agencies have limited authority to provide or support abortion-related services under current law. The law bans DOD and VA from using money and facilities for most abortions. Allowable exceptions include if a pregnancy results from rape or incest or would endanger the life of the mother.
Learn more
• DOD’s reproductive rights memo: https://rly.pt/3sRjRWd
• RAND’s “How the Dobbs decision could affect U.S. National Security”: https://rly.pt/3Dy7ft6
• VA’s interim rule on abortion counseling and services: https://rly.pt/3NdBdpA
• VA’s reproductive health benefits page: https://rly.pt/3Der4UH
Women in the Military
Health
Rights
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 6
16
16
0
Contrary to left wing propaganda, there was never a Constitutional right to infanticide. DOD should spend more resources and time on their core mission of national defense and developing warriors and less time devising schemes to end run states' rights and murder children in the womb.
(16)
(0)
SFC (Join to see)
That’s the first thing I thought of when I saw this post. Thank you for identifying what they are misrepresenting.
(1)
(0)
LTJG James Smith
Well said, CWO. Mr. Jones contradicts himself by properly listing life as the 1st inalienable right. He needs to explain why that right should be denied to those still in their mothers' wombs, which is where we all started. The fact that DoD is focused on killing babies instead of killing communists is just further proof of how woke ideology has emasculated our military, an example of leftist infiltration of all our institutions. None dare call it treason...
(0)
(0)
12
12
0
Thanks for the update on what the V.A. & D.O.D. can assist with regarding abortion-related services and contraception. This should be a decision between the individual & her doctor... not some politician. The Republicans have loaded the SCOTUS with Justices that no longer recognize "precedent"... contrary to what they communicated to the Senate during their confirmation hearing.
(12)
(0)
COL Randall C.
Charlie, I have to disagree with your characterization. If you look at the transcripts of each Justice's confirmation hearings, you'll see that all have recognized Roe v Wade as a precedent. However no Justice, neither Republican appointed nor Democratic appointed, will state that "I will never overturn precedent" or give an indication of which way they would vote.
The Supreme Court has overturned precedent 146 times since it's creating in 1789. Some were 'non-controversial overturns' (i.e., US v Darby) while others were significant (i.e., Plessy v Ferguson).
As Justice Brandeis stated back in 1932 regarding Stare Decisis (precedent), "Stare decisis – a doctrine, dating back to English Common Law, that courts should follow the precedent set by past cases – is not a “universal, inexorable command,” he wrote. But it “is usually the wise policy, because in most matters it is more important that the applicable rule of law be settled than that it be settled right.”
That's why overturning them is relatively rare (less than 1%). However, if precedent were never overturned, then same-sex marriage would be illegal, we'd still have "separate but equal", poor defendants would have no right to court-appointed counsel and many other "previously bad calls" would still be in effect.
I will say that liberals and conservatives both seem to refer to the court as an activist court (these weren't your specific words, but that's the impression I got) if they render an opinion that is not in line with their political views.
I neither express an opinion for or against abortion with this - I just want to be accurate regarding the court's actions.
The Supreme Court has overturned precedent 146 times since it's creating in 1789. Some were 'non-controversial overturns' (i.e., US v Darby) while others were significant (i.e., Plessy v Ferguson).
As Justice Brandeis stated back in 1932 regarding Stare Decisis (precedent), "Stare decisis – a doctrine, dating back to English Common Law, that courts should follow the precedent set by past cases – is not a “universal, inexorable command,” he wrote. But it “is usually the wise policy, because in most matters it is more important that the applicable rule of law be settled than that it be settled right.”
That's why overturning them is relatively rare (less than 1%). However, if precedent were never overturned, then same-sex marriage would be illegal, we'd still have "separate but equal", poor defendants would have no right to court-appointed counsel and many other "previously bad calls" would still be in effect.
I will say that liberals and conservatives both seem to refer to the court as an activist court (these weren't your specific words, but that's the impression I got) if they render an opinion that is not in line with their political views.
I neither express an opinion for or against abortion with this - I just want to be accurate regarding the court's actions.
(6)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
COL Randall C. - thank you for taking the time to voice your understanding... duly noted & respected.
(1)
(0)
SGM Mikel Dawson
COL Randall C. - Even Ruth Bader Ginsburg stated the Roe v Wade was a bad decision and she wasn't a Republican appointed Justice. SCOUS never said abortion was illegal, all they said it wasn't a federal matter and should be left to the people. Just stating the facts
(3)
(0)
MAJ Byron Oyler
SGM Mikel Dawson - Both sides need to stop looking at this as a loss or a victory and how it compares to the 14th amendment (1972 decision) verses the 10th (reversal). The 10th is a much stronger argument and people need to act in their states as Kansas did. Marijuana is not in the Constitution and all these states legalizing it against Federal Law now have a precedent.
(2)
(0)
6
6
0
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google