Avatar feed
Responses: 3
CPT Christopher Webb
2
2
0
I was taught that Pockets were actually called Air Force Gloves ... which is why we SOLDIERS couldn't put our hands in our pockets. (tongue in cheek, of course)
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ Security Cooperation Planner
2
2
0
Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS
The Army is a little more clear. Army Regulation 670-1 states, “While in uniform, personnel will not place their hands in their pockets, except momentarily to place or retrieve objects.”
(2)
Comment
(0)
Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS
Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS
>1 y
This just happened to pop up in my feed. I personally thought it was hilarious since it wasn't actually a satire piece from Duffel this time.

The fact that we need to have a reg "don't put your hands in your pockets" when we have GREAT historical photos of Chesty Puller with his hands in his pockets, or that we get bent out of shape regarding the tattoo policy when Smedley Butler had a MASSIVE EGA on his chest.

I shared for the pure absurdity of it.
(3)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LCDR Halinganji Kanani
2
2
0
The article is just stupid. First of all, the Marines are not misinterpreting their own uniform regulations. Maybe someone misused a semicolon in the writing of the uniform reg, but nobody's getting the interpretation wrong. Hands in pockets in uniform is unprofessional. All the services have the same rule. Secondly, since they are scrutinizing the reg so closely, how did they miss the fact that the very sentence in question clearly states that it is a list of "EXAMPLES of activities that detract from an appropriate military presence." Examples means it is not an all inclusive list of the activities that are banned while in uniform. They could have not even mentioned hands in pockets and it would still be banned because they have the right to use their good judgement.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close