Avatar feed
Responses: 7
PO1 John Miller
5
5
0
LTC Stephen F.
That helmsman had better be punished as well for refusing an order!
(5)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Stephen F.
3
3
0
SGM David W. Carr LOM, DMSM MP SGT The Commodore is being relieved for the following reasons:
"First, there was no navigation brief, a major violation of Navy protocol. When any Navy ship gets underway, even for something as minor as shirting berths from one pier to another, it is standard for a Navy crew to conduct a navigation brief discussing issues such as hazards to navigation or, in this case, an Iranian base near the planned course.
Second, the chain of command was not well defined on the two boats. While a young lieutenant was the highest-ranking individual on either of the two 50-foot boats, when the order was given to evade the Iranian forces, the helmsman refused the order.
Third, defense officials tell Fox News the Navy had become too complacent with the its treatment by Iranian forces in the months leading up to the January capture."
I would liken the navy fast boats to armored cavalry which patrolled the east German border during the Col, War with a fair amount of autonomy after being given clear guidance. The problem was the clear guidance was absent in the case of the naval fast boats that were intercepted.
(3)
Comment
(0)
SGM David W. Carr  LOM, DMSM  MP SGT
SGM David W. Carr LOM, DMSM MP SGT
8 y
LTC Stephen F. Sir read the comments just seamed funny. I was wondering to myself how many times these crews had performed this mission prior.

It has been a long time since I completed a small craft safety navigation course. Where we had to plot a course to a specific destination. They had state of the art high tech navigation equipment on both vessels along with communications to home ship or port. Also why wasn't higher headquarters tracking the vessels progress throughout.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGM David W. Carr  LOM, DMSM  MP SGT
3
3
0
LTC Stephen F. As an Army guy I have No clue of Naval procedures. But question A LT was not given a clear mission SOP with guidelines for various situations. Where was the leadership from the chain of command. Somewhere there was a failure to insure situational advisories and briefing verifying standards were understood and met. When you consider that several previous serious incidents involving the Iranian's provocation of USNavy vessels.

In the Army a young officer would have had an experienced NCO technically proficient to have the officer's back to making sure they could accomplish the mission in hostile waters. Also there must have been some kind of pre equipment inspection to verify equipment readiness.

I thing the young officer is in fact the scapegoat for failed leadership and combat awareness
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close