Avatar feed
Responses: 6
1px xxx
Suspended Profile
Edited 7 y ago
7870b2d9
Capt Dwayne Conyers - This is an exceedingly dangerous development. Does anyone have published figures on warhead dimensions and lift capacity of this ICBM? The problem is miniaturization of both nuclear and thermonuclear weapons in light of published high explosive shaped charge, fast reactor physics, thermonuclear reaction physics, and coupled nuclear-hydrodynamic simulation codes - together with clusters of cheap fast microprocessors - makes the design and validation of design - merely an iterative exercise in conceptual design, computer modeling, and simulation. The only real controls we have over proliferation are controls over materials that are allowed to be produced in reactors under supervision of international inspection agencies, some international trade sanctions and foreign policy influence discouraging physical device testing, and ultimately armed incursion to kill their designers, engineers, and leaders - and to seize, disable, and destroy their physical facilities, equipment, and materials - including most particularly their nuclear materials and nuclear materials production, chemical separation, refining, handling, and storage facilities. While we don't want to go to war with North Korea, we are fast approaching the point of no return. Warmest Regards, Sandy :)
p.s. John McPhee's 1994 biography of Stanislaw Ulam - The Curve of Binding Energy is a readily available easy to read book with all of the essential design details - and no math - covering nuclear and thermonuclear devices including the key recursive nature of thermonuclear design.

http://www.38north.org/2017/01/yongbyon011817/
1px xxx
Suspended Profile
7 y
GySgt John Olson - There is one reason for N Korean to MIRV - needing only to provide terminal guidance to one live warhead - the remaining reentry vehicles may be dummies or just a few large parts of the final stage requiring no guidance - their purpose is to provide worthless alternative infrared targets - to absorb as many THAAD interceptor missiles or other defensive interceptors as possible. Warmest Regards, Sandy
1px xxx
Suspended Profile
7 y
59d9a718
SGM (Join to see) - While it would appear the transporter is capable of erecting the HS-14 - the photos and videos suggest a pre-prepared concrete pad is required for launch - most likely because they don't want to destroy the transporter. There is also the problem N Korea has few roads capable of supporting transporter - perhaps one could interdict launch with traditional weapons damaging launcher pads plus access roads required for transporter operations. Warmest Regards, Sandy :)
1px xxx
Suspended Profile
7 y
.
1px xxx
Suspended Profile
7 y
D9729e0e
SGM (Join to see) - Newly designed single rocket motor. Warmest Regards, Sandy :)

http://rense.com/general96/icbmNK.html
SGT Scott Henderson
2
2
0
Edited 7 y ago
Didn't the CIA/NSA at one point have "black" teams that would go in, kill everyone, and shut this shit down while making it look like some horrible accident? What the fuck ever happened to those guys?
(2)
Comment
(0)
SFC William H.
SFC William H.
7 y
SGT Scott Henderson: James Earl Carter Jr.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT Scott Henderson
SGT Scott Henderson
7 y
SFC William H. - Aha, I started a couple years before he ended.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SFC William H.
SFC William H.
7 y
SGT Henderson: I am glad you got started and I am glad he ended. Take care.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Edward Tilton
2
2
0
Put our Navy out there, Next launch shoot it down and take out the launcher. We thought we were under attack.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Capt Dwayne Conyers
(1)
Reply
(0)
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
7 y
Capt Dwayne Conyers - With the Latest of Generation of Navy SM (Standard Missile) I think it is Viable.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SFC William H.
SFC William H.
7 y
Launch a hundred for every one of his. Oops!
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close