Avatar feed
Responses: 3
PO2 Robert Aitchison
2
2
0
I've been out for 23 years so it's hard to judge how much worse things are than when I was in. Though in talking to my son who's on active duty it seems he has more downtime than I ever had. Of course it's a bit of an apples to oranges comparison because I was a snipe on a CG and DD and he's in Combat Systems on a CVN.
(2)
Comment
(0)
LT Brad McInnis
LT Brad McInnis
>1 y
I was DCA and CHENG on DDG's. What I will say is that these DDG's were originally designed to be run with 300+ sailors. We went through the downsizing under Clinton, and were told to do more with less. They wanted us to run the ships with low 200's. They called it Smart Ship Manning, we called it pain! For example, I was originally manned to have 3 of a certain technician. After the reduced manning cuts, I had 1. Now, if their piece of gear breaks at 0400, they are up fixing it.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
1px xxx
Suspended Profile
It's sadly the same old story
CDR Naval Aviator
0
0
0
The aviation community has understood this for decades. This is why we have crew rest rules. Studies have shown that once you are past the 17-19 hour mark you are mentally impaired on the same level as someone who has had enough beers to blow a 0.05 BAC. Go much past that any you are up to 0.1 BAC. If you do that night after night the amount of time you are awake before you become impaired decreases significantly. So for instance after 5 days of only getting 5 hours of sleep you could be considered drunk at the 10 to 12 hour mark right when you are supposed to be on watch. Now combine that with 10 or so other watch standers plus leadership that is getting even less sleep and you have a extremely dangerous situation.

https://hbr.org/2006/10/sleep-deficit-the-performance-killer
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close