Avatar feed
Responses: 7
SGT Whatever Needs Doing.
4
4
0
The statistical possibility is enough that I would want to see all of them looked at again. It's not going to change the Administrative branch at this late date. But it will maybe change the way mail-in ballots are processed in the future.
(4)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Steven Depuy
4
4
0
The signature for me in the PA system is 42 years old. I suspect they might make the same claim about me, since I suspect mine is different now. That being said, they did get 20K more ballots back than they sent out in Arizona, and there has never been a proper explanation for that. Only, oh, they must have been mistaken about who they sent them to. This is why all mail in ballots need to have the voters information on them, not the way many do it now, and have a separate paper for that that does not stay with the ballot.
(4)
Comment
(0)
SPC Kevin Ford
SPC Kevin Ford
2 y
SPC Steven Depuy - Let's take a look at that.

There were 9 known ballots in the trash in PA, seven were for trump. Depending on the county in PA that may be a random distribution.
https://nypost.com/2020/09/24/fbi-investigates-ballots-for-trump-found-in-pennsylvania-garbage/
https://www.snopes.com/news/2020/09/25/pennsylvania-military-ballots/

I have not seen any credible reports of 6 million ballots found in the trash in PA. You would have to provide a link.

Considering there were under 6 million ballots cast in 2016 and less that 7 million in 2020, I'm not sure how 6 million ballots could have gone missing in PA for Trump. I'm thinking you are PA. Are you another state?
(0)
Reply
(0)
SPC Steven Depuy
SPC Steven Depuy
2 y
SPC Kevin Ford I said 6, not 6 million. Point was the way they brushed it off as oops, does not help keep a lid on those who try to twist things.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SPC Kevin Ford
SPC Kevin Ford
2 y
SPC Steven Depuy - Yes, I read military as million, my bad. So the number was nine and they were not all for Trump. No one was brushing it off, it was investigated and determined to be an error. In any election this size if people look hard enough we will find mistakes and yes even intentional malfeasance. Pretty much any presidential election in our lifetime that type of thing can be found if we look hard enough.

The question is, is it widespread enough to materially impact the results? The answer so far is no, no such widespread issues have been found. Either by error or malfeasance. But there is a group that has been trying to get that narrative to stick despite not having any evidence for it.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SPC Steven Depuy
SPC Steven Depuy
2 y
SPC Kevin Ford - Never thought it was enough. And when that Lazerne County issue was reported here, they said 6. I have no idea if there was enough fraud or not to have changed anything. At this point, I have some friends who still hope it gets overturned, but I have DNC friends who hoped the whole Mueller circus would do the same thing. The lawyers and politicians run all this crap on both sides, and they lie out their rear ends, and you never know what to believe. I felt GA Senate went like it did, because McConnell refused to take up the stimulus vote. Not for deep rooted corruption. And still wondering what happened to the Kracken Sydney promised us.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT James Murphy
2
2
0
We Know President Trump Won. We just can't seem to be able to DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT!
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close