Avatar feed
Responses: 4
Lt Col Charlie Brown
3
3
0
Just like our Congress apparently
(3)
Comment
(0)
LTC Kevin B.
LTC Kevin B.
1 y
True. However, Congress and the voters have mechanisms to fix the issues with Congress. That doesn't seem to be the case with the Supreme Court.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Ralph E Kelley
2
2
0
The following is satire:
"After our attempts to discredit the Supreme Courts Justices and failing, we will now concentrate on attacking their family members.", stated Boris.
"Why?" answered Natasha, "It didn't work with Hunter's Laptop."
Boris. explained, "You are not understanding . Our purpose is not to provide proof but to intimidate, sow confusion and distract from our agenda. Rocky and Bullwinkle will never stop us."
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Casey O'Mally
1
1
0
Holy tempest in a teapot, Batman.

She was a recruiter. She matched lawyers to firms. That's it. She didn't represent anyone or anything.
Yes, she got paid a lot of money. - around a million and a half a year. But thatbwas money paid by a private company which had nothing to do with the court. If companies want to paid stupidly high salaries, that is between them and their board /shareholders. Not a problem for Congress.

And yes, I said the exact same thing about Hunter.

Now... if there is some kind of proof that a firm OR lawyer who was scheduled to go before the court paid Jane a boatload of money for doing nothing, it might be a different story. But that is not what this article is saying.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close