Avatar feed
Responses: 2
MAJ Ken Landgren
2
2
0
Edited 12 mo ago
It appears that the program was never good to begin with but they went ahead and fielded Cerner. This is what Cerner was supposed to do: "VA is working to improve the sharing of Veteran health information by implementing a new electronic health record, or EHR, which is the software that stores health information and tracks all aspects of patient care for Veterans." Seems like a colossal eff up by everyone to include Kushner, Trumps SIL and the Mar A Lago crowd because the pushed to give Cerner Corp the contract.

Large and complex programs like this will often have unintended consequences which have to be fixed before fielding. I am sure red flags popped up, but it seems like Cerner was rammed down the VA's throat, warts and all. Apparently, the DOD uses the program thus some said it will be a seamless process of documents from the DOD to the VA. However, the VA functions are very different, and I will assume that is the crux of the matter. It had to be tailored for the VA. The one size fits all philosophy was a terrible myth.

DFAS attempted to create one pay platform for the Army, Navy, and Air Force. Here are the problems that were faced:

- Pay is not completely standardized through ought the three branches.
- Programmers need to understand the business rules for pay to program properly.
- Data must migrate from one program to another, and sometimes that data does not migrate neatly.
- It became too complex to develop one pay platform.


Damning evidence about the Mar A Lago people: https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/tech/gao-mar-a-lago-members-acted-as-advisors-va-initiatives-including-16b-cerner-ehr-contract
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
1
1
0
Interesting. My primary care PA at the Bonner County (ID) VA Clinic is leaving Friday to work at the Spokane VAMC . . .
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close