6
6
0
Gee, 300 here, 200 there, nothing to see. The election was completely fair right. Oh, I'm sure the Democrats will say its nothing.
Just a moment...
Posted from truthpress.comPosted in these groups: 
Election 2020
Elections
Election 2020 Elections
Posted 1 y ago
Responses: 3
6
6
0
Multiple investigations have found irregularities in the past elections. The response is always, "not enough to overturn the outcome". When government investigates government screw ups, it always ends in their favor.
(6)
(0)
SFC John D.
Well, like MSgt (Join to see) said, he's sure some Democrat will come by and say nothing to see here. Contractor throws ballots in the trash in PA - nothing to see here. Someone from the post office dumps them in Kentucky - nothing to see here. Couple of trays of mail (including mail-in ballots) end up in a ditch in Wisconsin - nothing to see here.
They they roll out the "These are isolated incidents and only a few have happened", but leave out the rest of the statement .. "that we know of". When it's something that is ideologically aligned to the Democrats, such as their striving to prove that the United States is an inherently racist society, they always put forth that for every instance that is proven to be true, there are a hundred more that aren't reported or go unnoticed.
But, when it's against their ideology (like having secure elections) then it's "that's just an isolated incident and proves nothing".
If it wasn't for double-standards, Democrats would have no standards at all.
They they roll out the "These are isolated incidents and only a few have happened", but leave out the rest of the statement .. "that we know of". When it's something that is ideologically aligned to the Democrats, such as their striving to prove that the United States is an inherently racist society, they always put forth that for every instance that is proven to be true, there are a hundred more that aren't reported or go unnoticed.
But, when it's against their ideology (like having secure elections) then it's "that's just an isolated incident and proves nothing".
If it wasn't for double-standards, Democrats would have no standards at all.
(7)
(0)
SPC Michael Duricko, Ph.D
SFC John D. Exactly the way it works. Very truthful post and a lot "to see there"!
(1)
(0)
2
2
0
Gotta love this: "Stanke said that the employee was not aware of the contents of the box."
In a pigs eye! The employee knew exactly what was in the boxes.
In a pigs eye! The employee knew exactly what was in the boxes.
(2)
(0)
0
0
0
The vague story is of one township in Michigan and is still under investigation. Story does not mention whether the ballots were proven to be legitimate. It also does not mention whether they were for local, state or federal elections.
https://www.abc12.com/news/politics/nearly-300-absentee-ballots-from-thetford-township-found-in-clio-storage-unit/article_4141c692-0570-11ee-9b3a-fba5da9c6ccc.html
https://www.abc12.com/news/politics/nearly-300-absentee-ballots-from-thetford-township-found-in-clio-storage-unit/article_4141c692-0570-11ee-9b3a-fba5da9c6ccc.html
Nearly 300 absentee ballots from Thetford Township found in Clio storage unit
An investigation is underway after 289 absentee ballots from the 2020 election were found in Thetford Township.The ballots were found inside a storage unit at Storage One in Clio last
(0)
(0)
MSgt (Join to see)
Thank you for proving one of my points and once again missing the big picture. I expected someone to try to defend it or attempt to down play it and you have stepped up and failed. It does NOT matter if it is a local, state, or federal election. The point and fact is it happened and this is NOT just a one off incident. It has happened in other areas of the country. 300 votes may seem insignificant to you, but they are not. There have been plenty of elections that have close calls and recounts because it came down to a hand full of votes. Even at the local, state, and federal levels. Mismanagement/mishandling (or whatever you want to call it) of ballots is a huge thing. But I don't expect you to understand that.
(6)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google