Avatar feed
Responses: 3
SGT Unit Supply Specialist
2
2
0
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
..."Those conclusions come from the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office, which today published its analysis of the Navy’s 30-year shipbuilding plan, a routine assessment mandated by lawmakers. The agency on Wednesday also published a broader assessment of the Pentagon’s 2024 future years defense program.

As it did in 2023, the Navy this year submitted three different profiles for its future fleet. The first two options are based around flat or declining defense budgets, while the third option assumes a growing shipbuilding account. While the service’s current fleet size is roughly 290, the Navy’s first plan would result in a fleet of 319 ships by 2053; the second in a fleet of 328 vessels; and the third in 367 ships.

The watchdog concluded that the least expensive of the three plans would cost $906 billion over a 30-year period, while the most expensive would be $979 billion over three decades. The Navy meanwhile generated cost estimates between $776 billion and $842 billion.

By comparison, CBO’s estimates for the fiscal year 2023 plan ranged between $825 billion and $908 billion, while the Navy’s were between $710 billion and $786 billion.

CBO found that although the mix of ships presented in the fiscal year 2024 plans mostly mirror that of 2023, the overall price of the fleet increased, driven largely by “higher estimated costs for submarines.”

“The growth reflected in the Navy’s and CBO’s estimates for the 2024 plan is mainly attributable to an increase in the estimated costs of many shipbuilding programs — especially submarine programs — and not to an increase in the number of ships,” according to the government watchdog’s report.

CBO also attributed the increases to factors such as some ships taking longer and proving more difficult to build than the Navy anticipated; ship designs being more complicated than expected; and certain cost estimates in previous plans being “unrealistically low.”...
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Carl Davis
1
1
0
Waste of money.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
PO3 Shayne Seibert
0
0
0
Nobody saw 17% inflation when they wrote the original draft proposals. Thank Biden for the increased costs. Now the Navy gets to rob Peter to pay Paul to get the boats we have to have, after scrapping the useless Littoral "combat" ships that can't even make it across a large body of water without a tug. Thank you Obama for that nightmare. Seems like a common theme.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close