Posted on Oct 17, 2015
SSgt Alex Robinson
3.59K
4
5
2
2
0
Avatar feed
Responses: 4
1LT William Clardy
1
1
0
The reality is that those "bannings" are really just a reiteration of standing regulations regarding the unauthorized possession of classified materials. In other words, it's the same as warning somebody that if they find a machine gun laying around and decide to pick it up and take it to the police, they are actually committing a felony they can be charged with, just like the elementary-school kid who picked up a gun to turn it in to his teacher got suspended for violating a zero-tolerance no-weapons policy.

None of which means that I agree with a notion that soldiers *should* be banned from acquiring any publicly available knowledge, just that I recognize the inflexibility and limitations of the law.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
1stSgt Sergeant Major/First Sergeant
1
1
0
I could see warning the troops, but not banning them.
(1)
Comment
(0)
SGT Jose Perdelia-Torres
SGT Jose Perdelia-Torres
>1 y
This is the U.S. America, this is not The Peoples Republic of China lol
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MSgt Electrical Power Production
0
0
0
The regulations on what you can reveal or read at what ever clearance level your at are for a reason. But what somebody doesn't know won't hurt them. So if you discover something you should not know or have keep your mouth shut and play dumb.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close