Posted on Oct 22, 2015
Sgt David G Duchesneau
14.5K
100
45
6
6
0
A46e7d54
"Another expensive F-35 glitch won't be fixed anytime soon. Earlier this month Defense News reported the Pentagon had learned the fifth-generation airplane’s ejection seat could cause fatal whiplash for pilots weighing under 136, despite the fact that the seat was designed to handle any pilot weighing between 103 and 245 pounds." Now come on, what is up with this picture? I mean, are all our US pilots in that weight category? And with a price tag of around $400 billion, the F-35 is the costliest weapon in U.S. history. WTF-Over?
Posted in these groups: F35 F-35Pilot logo PilotDouble barred dollar sign.svg MoneyProblem solving logo Problem Solving
Avatar feed
Responses: 16
Capt Walter Miller
7
7
0
The purpose is not to produce weapons.  The purpose is to spend money.

Walt
(7)
Comment
(0)
Capt Walter Miller
Capt Walter Miller
10 y
The obverse of the MIC is the story of the procurement of the B-17 in the mid '30s. The government negotiators were very, very stingy with the people's money. Don't you wish that were true now?

Any way Boeing had built the B-17 prototype on spec. And they were asking the princely sum of $250,000 a copy. But the government kept snipping away. "Does it really need two magnetos?" "What are variable pitch propellers?" And on and on, and finally were offering if I recall correctly, $207,000 per copy.

Boeing couldn't make the aircraft at that price.

Any way after the war, that type of thing stopped.

Walt
(1)
Reply
(0)
1SG Civil Affairs Specialist
1SG (Join to see)
10 y
For once, we agree Capt Walter Miller
(1)
Reply
(0)
Sgt David G Duchesneau
Sgt David G Duchesneau
10 y
No shit!
(1)
Reply
(0)
Capt Walter Miller
Capt Walter Miller
10 y
President Eisenhower said something like -- every dollar you spend on a bomb or a plane or a missile is a dollar you don't spend on a child.

That bird has come come to roost and it is crapping on all of us.

Walt
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Capt Mark Strobl
3
3
0
Let me draw a parallel between this mon$ter and the V-22: There are too many politician$ who, for the economic welfare of their constituent$, that are deeply invested in the $ucce$$ of thi$ program. It cannot fail --e$pecially in an election year.
(3)
Comment
(0)
Sgt David G Duchesneau
Sgt David G Duchesneau
10 y
I'm sure that they are in bed with Lockheed
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MSgt Repair & Reclamation Section Chief
3
3
0
To big to fail is why.
(3)
Comment
(0)
Sgt David G Duchesneau
Sgt David G Duchesneau
10 y
POLITICS!!!!! I'm sure that Hillery must have an answer? Shit, she has an answer for everything. Do you think that she would meet the weight requirement?
(1)
Reply
(0)
PO1 Tony Holland
PO1 Tony Holland
10 y
Sucking on the revolving door teat and campaign contributions (bribery) is more likely.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close