Posted on Sep 12, 2016
CSM Michael J. Uhlig
21.8K
157
52
7
7
0
I got it, you have the right to freedom of speech, but when you are a "professional" and a "role model" is there more expected from you? Is it from this platform that it now becomes you responsibility where you MUST act as that role model? I am interested in your thoughts.
Avatar feed
See Results
Responses: 36
SGT David T.
16
16
0
First off, professional athletes are not role models (well shouldn't be). Second, the freedom of expression is the cornerstone of liberty. I think it is great that they can protest the government and society in such a way without fear or arrest or worse even if I disagree with the manner in which they do it. However, the freedom to do something is not freedom from consequences. They are employees of an organization and if their actions violate their contract (which I am sure has a unilateral termination clause in it), then their employment can be terminated. That is matter between them and not my concern.
(16)
Comment
(0)
Capt Tom Brown
Capt Tom Brown
>1 y
Well said. Actions have consequences and people are held accountable one way or another.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
1px xxx
Suspended Profile
Many teams have clauses in their athletes contracts that if they behave poorly, they will be released. The NBA started this (I think) after Latrell Spreewell chocked out his coach (boss) at practice (work). There was no legal means to address workplace violence in the NBA! So a character clause was added to contracts. Now, if the 49ers really thought this was poor behavior, they would tell their players (employees) how to act IOT represent their franchise in their parent organization (NFL).
I agree with freedom of speech but just because you can, doesn't mean you should. Freedom comes with consequences of action and the NFL's silence is notable.
SGT Squad Leader
SGT (Join to see)
>1 y
I think we can both agree that there is a well-defined difference between an act of workplace violence and a peaceful protest.
(1)
Reply
(0)
1px xxx
Suspended Profile
>1 y
Of course there is, that's not the point.
CPT Joseph Ogulin
CPT Joseph Ogulin
1 y
This is entirely how I framed my argument any time someone asked me about it. This is an employer (NFL and Team) vs employee (Player) issue and cannot be resolved by a bunch of armchair quarterbacks and talking heads. Look up their contracts and the collective bargaining agreement. Look for an employee code of conduct. If this issue is not specifically addressed in there, then STFU and let them worry about it per these contracts. The only people the government can give an order/directive to on personal deportment during the Pledge of Allegiance or the performing of the National Anthem are members of the military and the civilian employees. For everyone else it is a suggestion or the freedoms that we all fought for mean absolutely nothing.
(0)
Reply
(0)
TSgt Joe C.
7
7
0
Although they are entitled to their opinion, I don't think it's cool to sit out the national anthem..ever! Represent your team and country....stand during the Anthem! Thanks for the poll CSM Michael J. Uhlig
(7)
Comment
(0)
Sgt Field Radio Operator
Sgt (Join to see)
>1 y
TSgt Joe C. I agree with you.
(0)
Reply
(0)
MSG Mechanic 2nd
MSG (Join to see)
>1 y
i agree sit no, now take a knee maybe
(1)
Reply
(0)
SFC James William Bolt   [ 40 Yards ]
SFC James William Bolt [ 40 Yards ]
>1 y
Young women@ men died under that flag and that song for your right to protest . You cross the line and make the protest that you are involved in mean nothing for what they have done for you to make that protest in the first place sign 40 yards
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close