Posted on Sep 16, 2014
WO1(P) Wobc Student
6.43K
6
7
4
4
0
Just wanted to see if anyone else had my point of view with this. There are a ton of signal MOS' but when you get to your unit most of us end up being cross trained on all of our equipment anyway. I think there should only be 3 Signal MOS'. Keep 25B for automations and help desk duties, a straight transmissions MOS and a LAN/WAN MOS. This would make the slotting and promotions for Signalliers more efficient.
Posted in these groups: Signal corp crest Signal CorpsStar Promotions
Edited >1 y ago
Avatar feed
Responses: 7
CW4 Craig Urban
1
1
0
Signal corp is mi. Snowden is a hero.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Cornelius Walsh
1
1
0
This is actually something that has been in the works for a while now, and for good reason. Far too often, I've heard Signaleers say "that's not my MOS" -- but communicators from each specialty should really be trying as best they can to learn every piece of equipment on their team. Great question.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC S6 Section Cheif
0
0
0
With the way technology is growing signal sections are too thin.
At the BN level my 25Us need to learn the B/Q world and vice versa just to cover down and not drop missions. Meanwhile I dont have enough experienced NCOs in the ranks to train and mentor new Soldiers in their field.
Personally I think you need expand the UMR at certain levels so we can meet all the mission requirements and not have to worry about brand new Soldiers from one MOS getting crash courses on a different MOS and sent out to "make it happen." We are almost at the point where we are wasiting Army time and money not capitalizing and developing Soldiers in their specialties after months of training.

Sometimes swiss army knife Soldiers aren't the best answer.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close