Posted on Dec 28, 2013
SSG Robert Burns
4.89K
76
61
2
2
0
I gave some thought to this today responding to an earlier SHARP thread. &nbsp;I think that "restricted" reports are not consistent with the Army Values, integrity and personal courage.<div>I think it's almost as like not reporting a crime when you know it happened. &nbsp;Yes you are technically reporting it but not really? &nbsp;You are reporting it but don't have the personal courage to face it. &nbsp;I don't want this to sound brash but we were talking about under reporting earlier. &nbsp;It has been said that if you witness as assault and don't report it, you are just as guilty as the offender. &nbsp;Well what about when you are the victim of the assault and don't report it?</div><div>Please don't get me wrong, I am sensitive to the difficulties of the victim but we are preaching a double standard, no matter how difficult it may be. &nbsp;To be a victim and not report is just as bad as seeing it and not reporting it. &nbsp;You are continuing to allow it to happen.</div><div>Personal Courage - to FACE fear, danger, or adversity.</div><div>Filing a restricted report doesn't hold ANYONE accountable. &nbsp;To me it is as bad as not reporting at all, maybe even worse. &nbsp;All it does it allow for the victim to get treatment. &nbsp;But it INHIBITS any investigation or charges just like not reporting does.</div><div>I hope I don't get attacked to hard on this one.</div>
Posted in these groups: E1688309 SHARP
Avatar feed
Responses: 14
CPT All Source Intelligence
8
8
0
The system is broken. &nbsp;Claiming that people who refuse to file publicly into a system that will not protect them - and likely not punish the perpetrator either - lack "personal courage" demonstrates a significant ignorance of what has been going on with this issue. &nbsp;<div><br></div><div>I know that there are people out there that are working hard to make things better and I applaud those efforts, but we are not there yet.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>As for your example of not reporting other crimes - Exactly! &nbsp;People don't tell when they know someone stole something from the PX. &nbsp;Why?</div><div><br></div><div>Now, picture that instead of having to report something impersonal, you have to report that someone overpowered you. &nbsp;Someone attacked you in an extremely personal way. &nbsp;Someone robbed you of something you can never replace. &nbsp;*And* you will be called a "narc," and you will be accused of contributing to the crime, and people will question your motives for your report, just as they would with the PX crime. &nbsp;But, different from the PX crime, you might not be able to prove that any crime happened, and even if you can, the criminal will likely be essentially let go. &nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>There are no easy answers here. &nbsp;I firmly believe that if there were, the problem would be solved. &nbsp;Hearing someone say that people who don't report lack "<font color="#4d4d4d"><span style="font-size: 12px;">integrity and personal courage" has me shaking my head at how far we still have to go. &nbsp;What your remarks lack is empathy, and that kind of lack of empathy&nbsp;suppresses&nbsp;reporting.</span></font></div>
(8)
Comment
(0)
SFC Michael Hasbun
SFC Michael Hasbun
>1 y
Not just involving sexual assault/harrasment, every single NJP, Article 15, Court Martial or chapter I've ever seen, initiated, testified at, or been involved in involved alcohol in some way... It's the gigantic white elephant in the room.
(1)
Reply
(1)
SFC Michael Hasbun
SFC Michael Hasbun
>1 y
A down vote? Clearly I've offended an alcoholic..
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSgt Forensic Meteorological Consultant
SSgt (Join to see)
>1 y
CPT Ann.  I agree with you.  It is like the players who would not talk about the steroid abuse.  They knew they would be the sacrificial lamb.  Oh, and they were.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSG Robert Burns
SSG Robert Burns
>1 y
CSM Heidke made the down votes but didn't bother to enlighten us.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MSG Master Leader Course Facilitator
4
4
0
Edited >1 y ago
While you do make some valid points.. The whole purpose behind the restricted report is to allow the survivor time to regain control of their situation. To determine the course of action that is to be taken.. Get services needed prior to getting the chain of command and CID involved. Most restricted reports end up going unrestricted anyhow but you can't diminish the integrity or the person's character who decides not to go unrestricted. Often times victims tend to be re victimized which can add to trauma. It's in our inquisitive nature to want to ask our fellow Soldiers what's wrong during times of crisis but it can do more harm than good in instances of military sexual trauma. Restricted reporting is very important and should never be looked down upon as much as we all want to nail the bastards who commit these horrible crimes. Remember, re victimizing can be devastating.
(4)
Comment
(0)
SSG Robert Burns
SSG Robert Burns
>1 y
Great points SSG McGee.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Paralegal Specialist
3
3
0

Yeah, you are gonna get flamed on this one. Let me see if I can help clarify the issue. You are mixing up two different programs - military justice and SHARP. The purpose of SHARP is to support and render assistance to victims of sexual assault. Military justice deals with good order and discipline - hence prosecutions and investigations.


A civilian who is sexually assaulted can receive care and refuse to disclose information about an attack but until recently, a military member who was assaulted could NOT receive needed care and not disclose.


I know we are all trained to look at "the big picture" but we also all need to be aware that that big picture contains a lot of individuals who deal with adversity differently and what your definition of facing fear is may not be what others define it as. I would encourage you to attend a sexual assault trial (one that is contested where the victim must testify) before you weigh in on what the standard of facing fear should be.

(3)
Comment
(0)
SFC Paralegal Specialist
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
I knew I should have deleted the snarky part at the end - sorry! My point is that those are two different programs. SHARP's purpose isn't prosecution - its victim support.
(1)
Reply
(0)
CPT Aaron Kletzing
CPT Aaron Kletzing
>1 y
You can always 'Edit' your posts. :)
(0)
Reply
(0)
SFC Paralegal Specialist
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
Ma'am, I considered it but then his comment looks snarky and that wouldn't be right since I made an improper snap judgment and he only responded so I'll just take it and learn to read my post before I submit :-)
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSG Robert Perrotto
SSG Robert Perrotto
4 y
I agree 100% with you SFC Glady's. Sharp is not a punitive program, it's focus is prevention, and in the event of, getting the services a victim needs as fast and safe as possible, in as dignified and respectful as possible. That means we take our lead from the victim, in the case of assault/rape, the mental trauma may not be something he/she is ready to go through again as an unrestricted report would be investigated poste haste, and may hinder/harm the victim as they try to heal/recover. The choice to make it unrestricted is never removed as an option, at any time, the victim can make it unrestricted. The restricted report gives the victim time and services, while they gather their dignity, agency, and self esteem.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close