5
5
0
2014 – The establishment of a new caliphate was announced, with Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi named as its caliph, and the group formally changed its name to the “Islamic State.”
IS’s ideology originates in the branch of modern Islam that aims to return to the early days of Islam, rejecting later “innovations” in the religion which it believes corrupt its original spirit. It condemns later caliphates and the Ottoman empire for deviating from what it calls pure Islam and hence has been attempting to establish its own caliphate.
From its beginnings the establishment of a pure Islamic state has been one of the group’s main goals. According to journalist Sarah Birke, one of the “significant differences” between Al-Nusra Front and ISIS is that ISIS “tends to be more focused on establishing its own rule on conquered territory”. While both groups share the ambition to build an Islamic state, ISIS is “far more ruthless … carrying out sectarian attacks and imposing sharia law immediately”.
ISIS finally achieved its goal on 29 June 2014, when it removed “Iraq and the Levant” from its name, began to refer to itself as the Islamic State, and declared the territory which it occupied in Iraq and Syria a new caliphate. In mid-2014, the group released a video entitled “The End of Sykes–Picot” featuring an English-speaking Chilean national named Abu Safiyya. The video announced the group’s intention to eliminate all modern borders between Islamic Middle Eastern countries; this was a reference to the borders set by the Sykes–Picot Agreement during World War I.
https://thisdayinusmilhist.wordpress.com/2005/06/29/june-29/
IS’s ideology originates in the branch of modern Islam that aims to return to the early days of Islam, rejecting later “innovations” in the religion which it believes corrupt its original spirit. It condemns later caliphates and the Ottoman empire for deviating from what it calls pure Islam and hence has been attempting to establish its own caliphate.
From its beginnings the establishment of a pure Islamic state has been one of the group’s main goals. According to journalist Sarah Birke, one of the “significant differences” between Al-Nusra Front and ISIS is that ISIS “tends to be more focused on establishing its own rule on conquered territory”. While both groups share the ambition to build an Islamic state, ISIS is “far more ruthless … carrying out sectarian attacks and imposing sharia law immediately”.
ISIS finally achieved its goal on 29 June 2014, when it removed “Iraq and the Levant” from its name, began to refer to itself as the Islamic State, and declared the territory which it occupied in Iraq and Syria a new caliphate. In mid-2014, the group released a video entitled “The End of Sykes–Picot” featuring an English-speaking Chilean national named Abu Safiyya. The video announced the group’s intention to eliminate all modern borders between Islamic Middle Eastern countries; this was a reference to the borders set by the Sykes–Picot Agreement during World War I.
https://thisdayinusmilhist.wordpress.com/2005/06/29/june-29/
Posted in these groups: 
Military History
ISIS
Military History ISIS
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 1
2
2
0
IS would love to be recognized as a "real" country. It'll never happen.
While Sykes-Picot was an imperfect plan, it did allow for the stabilization of the area after the demise of the Ottoman Empire - who had administered the area for hundreds of years.
It is notable that aside from a nationalist uprising in Iraq, there was very little disorder in the area throughout British/French rule. As soon as they left and the area became self-governing, chaos ensued.
Islamic State is just about the most barbaric regime in my lifetime, with honorable mention to the Khmer Rouge. They want to govern the area they've subjugated, but have no ability to do so beyond kangaroo courts, murdering "undesirables" (they tossed four accused homosexuals off a building ove the weekend to commemorate Pride Day), and making propoganda.
In truth, they are little more than pirates. Trafficking in people - forced "marriages" is a favored technique - pillaging the area of anything of value, sensless killings, and destruction of cultural legacy is what they do with their newfound ascendancy.
They may be ruthless and seem unstoppable at times, but conquerors that behave as IS does do not succeed. Their inability to provide basic services coupled with their brutality will be their undoing. Probably a lot sooner than it looks today.
While Sykes-Picot was an imperfect plan, it did allow for the stabilization of the area after the demise of the Ottoman Empire - who had administered the area for hundreds of years.
It is notable that aside from a nationalist uprising in Iraq, there was very little disorder in the area throughout British/French rule. As soon as they left and the area became self-governing, chaos ensued.
Islamic State is just about the most barbaric regime in my lifetime, with honorable mention to the Khmer Rouge. They want to govern the area they've subjugated, but have no ability to do so beyond kangaroo courts, murdering "undesirables" (they tossed four accused homosexuals off a building ove the weekend to commemorate Pride Day), and making propoganda.
In truth, they are little more than pirates. Trafficking in people - forced "marriages" is a favored technique - pillaging the area of anything of value, sensless killings, and destruction of cultural legacy is what they do with their newfound ascendancy.
They may be ruthless and seem unstoppable at times, but conquerors that behave as IS does do not succeed. Their inability to provide basic services coupled with their brutality will be their undoing. Probably a lot sooner than it looks today.
(2)
(0)
1LT William Clardy
Based upon history, the greatest impediment to the Caliphate's success is more likely to be self-inflicted ignorance (the Taliban are a good example of this -- understanding basic accounting seemed to be near the limits of their abilities), although ISIS so far is performing better at logistics than most of the fundamentalist Islamic groups.
But emphasizing rote memorization of the Quran over the times tables does eventually exact a price when you're trying to run a military campaign.
But emphasizing rote memorization of the Quran over the times tables does eventually exact a price when you're trying to run a military campaign.
(1)
(0)
1SG (Join to see)
Honestly I think the Taliban has a better chance of success than IS does. Their philosophy - if you can call it that - is much more compatable with the Afghan, particularly Pashtun people. IS is operating in an area that has had too much exposure and education in the West to go back to the dark ages.
(1)
(0)
1LT William Clardy
The same used to be said of Afghanistan, 1SG (Join to see). Have you ever read "Taliban" by Ahmed Rashid?
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google