Posted on Nov 6, 2014
SGM Senior Adviser, National Communications
2.75K
11
13
1
1
0
Avatar feed
Responses: 7
SCPO Emergency Management Director
2
2
0
I think it is a start. The more military friendly representatives we have the better. I think the younger vets will offer insight that is not presently there.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
COL Vincent Stoneking
2
2
0
For whatever reason, I find this vaguely reassuring. Regardless of their politics, I find the fact that they were willing to serve before "public service" a hopeful sign. Maybe "serve" means to them what it means to me.

Then again, I can think of a lot of jerks that served before being elected who remained jerks.... I'm still more fond of veteran jerks.
(2)
Comment
(0)
SGM Senior Adviser, National Communications
SGM (Join to see)
>1 y
Me too. At least we can have a common basis from which we can disagree.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Capt Richard I P.
1
1
0
Edited >1 y ago
SGM (Join to see) I think one of the real problems is that the percentage is decreasing. http://www.moaa.org/Main_Menu/Take_Action/Top_Issues/Serving_in_Uniform/Compensation/Fewer_Vets_on_the_Hill.html

Maybe we can still get the new congress to do something useful, like Arm the "Armed Forces.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Capt Richard I P.
Capt Richard I P.
>1 y
Maybe we can still get the new congress to do something useful, like Arm the "Armed Forces". Come support the right of the armed forces to be armed!: http://www.rallypoint.com/answers/arm-the-armed-forces
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close