Posted on Nov 10, 2014

Do you believe that the Non-Commissioned Officer Evaluation System is fair and impartial to every rated NCO?

SFC (Join to see)

1.95K

9

1

0

I remember when NCOER's were completed on word processors. We have come a long way since then. I will refrain from imparting my personal views on this subject until we have gotten a good discussion going.

Posted >1 y ago

Follow this discussion

There are no issues with the NCOER evaluation system.

There are minor issues with the NCOER evaluation system.

There are major issues with the NCOER evaluation system.

The NCOER evaluation system is completely corrupt and has ended the career of many potentially great future Senior Enlisted leaders.

See Results

Responses: 1

0

MAJ (Join to see)

Posted >1 y ago

The new EES-based NCOER that requires raters and senior raters to block-check, and limits top blocks to no more than 49% of the rated population, will go a long way to deflating over-inflated NCOERs. But it won't fix a system (Army Human Resources Management) designed essentially to promote mediocrity.

Only a truly competitive, market-based ratings and assignment system, where the best and brightest are recognized, rated, promoted, and assigned accordingly, would, and we'll never get there. See Tim Kane's "Bleeding Talent" for a proposal on how such a system could look.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/06/business/bleeding-talent-sees-a-military-management-mess.html?_r=0

Do you believe that the Non-Commissioned Officer Evaluation System is fair and impartial to every rated NCO?

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.