Leaders, how many of you require that your Soldiers be enrolled in civilian education? Why or why not?

Wow ! Wished I'd had that way back when I was in Germany. But, I suppose we were either out in the field or preparing for it, or some major inspection. My fellow officers and the senior NCOs taught a variety of subjects in the classroom, and some were certainly advanced high school and college level, but I don't know that any of them qualified our men for credit hours. 50 years ago, hard to remember all those details....

1LT Rich Voss - The courses were taught by CTC which was the local military college provider up at Panzer casern and why we had to seat at least 8 troops per class. There was a ton of coordination required because of the field/ training cycles but the Co carved out the time.

Mabe the instructor should have given a pre-test just to see what average level of knowledge the students had to start the class instruction with that.Im trying to say mabe its better to start off entry level and the work their way up.

Funny I was pulled in to the office and told I was not a team player because I went to school every night.

Agreed SGM, but I will take it a step further. As leaders, if we do all of the above as you mentioned, then we also owe it to our Soldiers to ensure they are well informed and making informed decisions in regards to selecting majors and colleges in which to utilize their TA. That should be the job of the professionals, the counselors at the Army Education Centers. However, they often "push" the nationally accredited for-profit distance learning institutions, which are not always recognized by civilian employers, nor are their credits transferable to regionally accredited schools (non-profits). Those credits and degrees are fine for promotion points and board selections, but are not always helpful on a job resume or if pursuing a higher degree with the GI Bill after leaving the military. Most young Soldiers (myself included back in the day) don't know the difference between regionally accredited and nationally accredited. The term "nationally accredited" sounds more prestigious than "regionally", but the opposite is true. I learned all this the hard way, when I retired and hit the job market with a close to worthless Bachelors degree in Business Admin. I did go back to school, at a real college, using the MGIB, but couldn't transfer not one credit from the school that I earned a degree from using TA while on AD.

Great response SGM! Using the word "require" was done to see what level of encouragement, support, and incentivization leaders are using to encourage civil school attendance. As SFC Fullerton points out, I was one of those individuals guided to a for-profit that realized far too late that the master's degree I had spent years attaining was only a viable degree in the government workforce. My career plans are to eventually be a DA Civilian so it's not an issue, and my MOS requires a Bachelors with 24 hours in business so it is an area of interest for me in terms of what are first-line leaders doing to support Soldiers after service needs.

The question of the downside is, of course, a tricky one. Ensuring the Soldier has time in the day (not simply duty day), to work on course completion is essential. Once the Soldier is on the path the burden is on the leader to support them while still accomplishing the mission.

I would do my initial section counseling for new section personnel and encourage them to take classes and if needed would adjust the duty schedule so they could attend.