Posted on May 8, 2015
Army Times
16.6K
85
42
4
4
0
635666138461949802 arm golsteyn 5
From: Army Times

Newly surfaced Army documents allege that Maj. Mathew Golsteyn told the CIA he killed an unarmed Afghan bombmaker in his custody in 2011, and later conspired with others to destroy the body. The documents also allege Golsteyn, who has never faced criminal charges, knew what he did was illegal.

The Intercept published the Army documents on Wednesday night. They include a September 2014 information paper that outlines Golsteyn's alleged 2011 confession and the subsequent investigation into his 2010 actions while he was commanding soldiers in Afghanistan as a part of 3rd Special Forces Group.

"In an interview conducted with the CIA, then-CPT Golsteyn claimed to have captured and shot and buried a suspected IED bomb maker," the information paper states. "He further went to comment that he went back out with two others to cremate the body and dispose of the remains."

Army Criminal Investigation Command was unable to corroborate Golsteyn's alleged claims and therefore could not prosecute. However, Army Secretary John McHugh revoked Golsteyn's Special Forces tab and also the officer's valor award — a Silver Star that was due for an upgrade to the Distinguished Service Cross.

The Intercept also published an April 24, 2014, letter of reprimand written by Brig. Gen. Darsie Rogers, commander of Army Special Forces Command (Airborne).

"Your behavior in this matter manifests a complete lack of judgment and responsibility," Rogers wrote. "You have discredited yourself, the U.S. Army Special Forces Command, and the United States Army. Your conduct constitutes a serious departure from the high standards of integrity and professionalism expected of a Commissioned officer of this command."

McHugh's spokesman Lt. Col. Chris Kasker confirmed to Army Times that the documents were genuine.

The briefing said the CIA notified the Defense Department on Sept. 14, 2011 of a "possible violation of criminal law due to CPT Golsteyn stating that he shot an unknown, unarmed Afghani male." It says a transcript of the interview is attached, though it was not posted or described by The Intercept, an online publication initially founded in 2014 as a platform for documents released by Edward Snowden. Snowden has been charged by the U.S. Justice Department for leaking large quantities of classified materials in 2013. He accessed the documents while working as a contractor for the National Security Agency and shared them with journalists Glenn Greenwald and Laura Poitras, both now editors for The Intercept.

Joe Kasper, spokesman for U.S. Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., a Golsteyn advocate, called the new release a "subjective Army document" lacking a lot of important context.

"Words like 'confessed' and 'murder,' those are creations of the Army," Kasper said. "This is the Army's way of editorializing the decision.".

Golsteyn allegedly told the CIA that "he knew it was illegal but was not remorseful as he had solid intelligence and his actions protected the safety of his fellow teammates."

The briefing also says Golsteyn declined multiple opportunities to provide a rebuttal or response during the investigative process. Only after the reprimand did he provide a rebuttal, one written by his lawyer.This was not included in the document leak.

The Army, while refusing to detail charges against him, moved to kick him out of the service earlier this year. Golsteyn's board of inquiry, where he'll make a case against separation, begins May 18. He has since been removed from combat duties; a recent evaluation indicated he had been teaching urban combat courses and learning Russian.

For this story, Army Times reached out to Golsteyn's lawyer Phil Stackhouse by email and multiple phone calls. Stackhouse did not immediately respond.

According to the Intercept story, Stackhouse said by email that the briefing "contains incorrect information in several important and significant areas." He also repeated his stance denouncing the Army's actions against Golsteyn and stressing the lack of corroborated evidence from the investigation.

Golsteyn's evaluations, provided to Army Times via Hunter's office, suggest he had been a model officer.

Author and veteran Bing West quoted Golsteyn in his 2011 book "The Wrong War" as critical of the war's strategy.

"We're the insurgents here," Golsteyn said, according to West. "...and we're selling a poor product called the Kabul government."

http://www.armytimes.com/story/military/crime/2015/05/07/documents-matthew-golsteyn-allegedly-admitted-murdering-afghan-bombmaker/70948210/
Avatar feed
Responses: 22
SSG Adam Wyatt
9
9
0
Shit happens.
(9)
Comment
(0)
SPC Larry Buck
SPC Larry Buck
9 y
P.C. words please!! Oops is better! But stick with accidents.. Ok?
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSG Adam Wyatt
SSG Adam Wyatt
9 y
Ok. I'll be more specific. I, Adam D. Wyatt, condone the summary execution of terrorist bomb makers who are caught by more than single source intelligence. That's about as "P.C." as this guy gets.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
1SG Special Forces Senior Sergeant
9
9
0
I need to see some proof before I pass judgement on this one.
(9)
Comment
(0)
LTC Paul Labrador
LTC Paul Labrador
9 y
I need more details as well.....but if he did execute an unarmed prisoner, that is definately a no go.
(3)
Reply
(0)
MSG Brad Sand
MSG Brad Sand
9 y
1SG (Join to see)

What? Proof before judgement? Next you will be saying crazy things like, innocent until proven guilty?
(5)
Reply
(0)
1SG Special Forces Senior Sergeant
1SG (Join to see)
9 y
There is a ton still missing and not sure what is going on with the investigation or how far it has progressed. A close friend of mine was accused by a former Interpreter (who had a visa about to expire and facing deportation back to Afghanistan) of beating and killing an Afghan detainee. He was drug through the mud for MONTHS until the investigation turned up what we all knew which was the whole thing was FABRICATED by the terp so he could stay in the states. Once cleared he was told he could go back to a Team. He laughed at them and retired.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
1SG First Sergeant
6
6
0
Based on the reading it is all alledged allocations and there is lack of evidence to move forward with charges. With that if they can not press charges then I would say there is a good chance he did what he felt was right and it was. We will have to see what comes out in his request to stay in and that may change my view and several others.
(6)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close