Will the insurrectionist retirees/veterans lose their VA/Service benefits?

Precise. Pointed. Educated. Great response. SFC Dennis Calkins

SPC Robert James , sounds legit to me.

Remover any and all political bias and ultimately anyone that committed acts of violence and destruction/vandalism of property and assaults on law enforcement officers are CRIMINLAS. Those that attacked the Constitutionally designated seat of power and our elected representatives using force to interfere with the mechanisms of government are guilty of a crime. Their violation of of their oath to support and defend the constitution of the United States will not go unpunished. In the end. It does not pay to be a convenient idiot in the name of partisan theatrics and power plays. Politicization of military service is disgusting and we should all recoil away from it.

People who were involved with violence should be prosecuted. Again- take the politics out of it for 1 minute- WOULD YOU BE ALRIGHT WITH ANYONE PHYSICALLY BREAKING INTO THE CAPITAL AND HARMING POLICE OFFICERS AND DOING DAMAGE TO THE PLACE??

MSgt Steve Sweeney - Does not matter what "they" believed or did not, they had not chance of success due simply to how our government is structured and works. They did not have the sitting President on their side, that was pretty resoundingly apparent and affirmed with this latest failed impeachment trial.

SSG Brian G. - On January 6th, Donald Trump was the sitting President, genius. Joe Biden's inauguration was on the 20th... Or didn't you know that. So as a matter of fact, they DID have the sitting President backing them up and spurring on the insurrection.

MSgt Steve Sweeney - Very good, you finally figured that one out, genius. Now that you had someone smarter than you inform you of that little fact, ask them to point out in your favorite crayon color where he said to attack the Capital. Oh wait, that NEVER happened. That is the crazed moronic idea that people like YOU got in your heads and parroted after taking snippets from various speeches and assuming. No little intellect challenged one, they did not have ANY President backing them up. Or did you conveniently miss that in the evidence. You know, those things called facts that the Democrats LACKED utterly. Point of fact Trump only said to march to the Capital PEACEFULLY. Maybe when you learn to read you might comprehend these things.

SSG Brian G. - Mob bosses rarely tell people to commit crimes openly, and yet they run the show under which crimes are committed. Nor do criminals always give signed confessions or openly discuss their crimes, and yet they are charged just the same. I know it is entirely beyond your limited comprehension or understanding how this happens, but maybe one day when you are a fully realized adult you will be able to figure it out. But first you will have to figure out when Presidents are inaugurated and who is the sitting President up to that point. You have some work to do. Good luck with that.

I do enjoy how people like you when they clearly make a mistake try so desperately to play it off instead of simply owning up to it. Reminds of the low caliber of people that vote for people like Trump.

The military has been taken over by communists and snowflakes... I wouldn't want to go to war with them... against them - I'd vote for that

GySgt Aaron S. - Depends on if you're talking about the laughing guy, or the insurrectionist accuser? I'm guessing you're talking about SGT Hector the accuser... Which in that case I agree.

Yes, attempting to thwart a constitutionally mandated process to certify a legal election is the very definition of insurrection.

SSgt Tom Neven - hate to tell you this, Skippy, but there was no "attempting to thwart" anything... and if they were, then a few cops with pistols stopped an "insurrection"... makes it a pretty sad "insurrection". It was "trespassing"... at worst. A innocent woman DID die, and no protests, no Presidential hosting in the White House... no riots. Makes you wonder how important that "insurrection" actually was.