Posted on Sep 16, 2021
SFC MLRS/HIMARS Crewmember
14K
87
41
20
20
0
If it's true the CJCS informed the Chinese that he would warn them of nuclear attack should he face court martial or tried for treason? If he called just to inform them that the US arsenal was secure after Jan 6th, should he face any repercussions?
Posted in these groups: General %28gen%29  o 10 GenNuclear popularsocialscience com NuclearCJCS
Avatar feed
Responses: 25
Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen
12
12
0
No, look up why hot lines between Moscow and US were put in.
(12)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MSG Intermediate Care Technician
10
10
0
His only bosses are the SecDef and the POTUS. Unless those two decide to take action....ain't nothing gonna happen.
(10)
Comment
(0)
MSG Stan Hutchison
MSG Stan Hutchison
4 y
As it should be.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Casey O'Mally
5
5
0
Edited 4 y ago
I have never been CJCS or even a General. Heck, I've never even been an Officer.

But....


I have to imagine that at least *part* of the job of the CJCS is interfacing with foreign Generals and discussing strategic agreements. He is not the State Department, and should not be *creating* or *authorizing* strategic agreements but laying the foundations prior to, and then discussing implementation afterwards I would imagine as part of his bailiwick.

So, in that light, stating that, yes, our nuclear arms are secure, would not be a violation. Telling them he would warn of nuclear attack walks dangerously close - but *talking about* doing something is different than actually *doing* it.

Either way, it would not be treason unless we are actually at war with China, which we are not. They can be accurately described as an adversary or possibly even a hostile power. But not an actual war-time enemy.
(5)
Comment
(0)
1px xxx
Suspended Profile
4 y
China is more like…our dealer lol
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close