Posted on Dec 18, 2024
SGT Joseph Gunderson
10.7K
164
22
114
114
0
31534746
If you have not heard of the Major Richard Star Act, the legislation would eliminate the offset for disabled veterans who were medically retired before completing twenty years of service. For some, this would result in a large bump in their monthly benefits. Do you believe this legislation needs to be passed? Can you elaborate on your opinion of the legislation?
Avatar feed
Responses: 8
MSG Stan Hutchison
18
18
0
The only change I might make is " combat-disabled" perhaps should be "service connected-disabled"
(18)
Comment
(0)
SGT Louis Perrault
SGT Louis Perrault
5 mo
Why combat disabled? There are plenty of us that were never considered to be in combat mode but were wounded during fire fights. Many have never received respect for thier part.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Trent Klug
6
6
0
I would only be in favor of this if it were for disabilities due to combat. Some of the offsets are negated or reduced by the V3 identifier, which is given by the Physical Evaluation Board.
(6)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
Lt Col Scott Shuttleworth
6
6
0
Not real sure what I think of it to be honest. Most folks I know that were medically discharged are now 100% disabled anyway post discharge so there is no offset. 50% and above there is no offset.
(6)
Comment
(0)
CMSgt John Owens
CMSgt John Owens
5 mo
Sir, you are incorrect. If under 20 years then you have the offset, no matter your percentage through branch of Service.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Lt Col Scott Shuttleworth
Lt Col Scott Shuttleworth
5 mo
CMSgt John Owens Chief... respectfully I am not...there are two people I currently work with who were medically discharged whou have 100 percent with no offset from the VA...work with them everyday so I know it can be done. Cheers.
(0)
Reply
(0)
PO2 Mike Laurey
PO2 Mike Laurey
11 h
Lt Col Scott Shuttleworth - The issue with what you are saying is that when people sign that contract you know as well as I do there are no refusing orders despite the existing hazards. The problem with military leadership is sending junior members to perform hazardous tasks that could have been avoided with common sense. A good example of that was the burn pits. I know of someone who is rated at 100% doing all the things you mentioned with only 40% of his lung capacity and a battle with cancer because of incompetent leadership. Getting conditions rated is not some simple task where people can easily abuse the system. These are medically documented conditions.
(0)
Reply
(0)
PO2 Mike Laurey
PO2 Mike Laurey
11 h
MAJ Byron Oyler - If we want to save money, let not stop putting junior enlisted in unnecessary hazardous conditions like burn pits which was known to have profound health effects to save a buck. You want to know why there are so many disabled vets? The rating system has been vetted and scrutinized, time to look at Active duty leadership.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close