Posted on Jul 26, 2016
About 2 months ago I was arrested for article 92 violation. If my command pursues it, what are my options?
18.8K
20
10
4
4
0
My dog broke his tie out and bit three people I had a broken foot and was unable to effectively catch him. I had him put down the next day. It was hard but people must come first. 1 injury required stitches, no lawsuits involved and the mps said I followed the rules. So is it likely to be pursued and if so what are my options?
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 5
SGT (Join to see) Id say get out in front of it, talk with the commander, state what happened, what actions you took to make it right and ask thier advice, you want to do the right thing, what else should i do?
1:You will get an instant read on what the "mood" is and perhaps some real insight on the direction this is heading.
2: You show them your taking this head on, accepting personal responsibility., acknowledging the fault and working to make it right. We all make mistake, it is what you do after that counts.
3: You are not forcing then to "wonder" what is going on, assuming the worst, you give them an opportunity to vent if needed and be the leader...working to a path that is moving on... If that is a crappy path and you get your pre trial notice and counseling, at least its in the open.
of note I have some personal experience with this..
I had two of my pups get out an broken gate, they walked the area and came upon a cat, said cat did not end well, cops called, they chased the dogs back to the house and thier property... once there one dog turned and warned the chasing offcier not to come further on the property.. he ignored the clear signs and continued into the fenced yard, was bit
this was off post, I was charged with failure to control my domestic animal.
Cited on paper not technically arrested.
I too felt compelled to euthanize the one pup that bit a human,,, not happy about it it all, and felt she was only guarding her property.. but over all is was needed.
I met with the prosecutor, gave my side of the story, laid out what actions i had already taken, new gate latching system , dog no longer a concern aggressive and liability wise, and I had made a personal visit to the former cat owner (who was NOT cited for allowing the cat to roam free, a city ordinance violation i may have mentioned to the prosecutor) and paid restitution for the vet bill.
The prosecutor saw that I had accepted responsibility, acted accordingly BEFORE be so ordered by the court.. made one additional requirement he felt prudent (have the entire fence "inspected" and submit a report and have the other dog evaluated for aggressiveness and submit findings" once done charges were dropped.
1:You will get an instant read on what the "mood" is and perhaps some real insight on the direction this is heading.
2: You show them your taking this head on, accepting personal responsibility., acknowledging the fault and working to make it right. We all make mistake, it is what you do after that counts.
3: You are not forcing then to "wonder" what is going on, assuming the worst, you give them an opportunity to vent if needed and be the leader...working to a path that is moving on... If that is a crappy path and you get your pre trial notice and counseling, at least its in the open.
of note I have some personal experience with this..
I had two of my pups get out an broken gate, they walked the area and came upon a cat, said cat did not end well, cops called, they chased the dogs back to the house and thier property... once there one dog turned and warned the chasing offcier not to come further on the property.. he ignored the clear signs and continued into the fenced yard, was bit
this was off post, I was charged with failure to control my domestic animal.
Cited on paper not technically arrested.
I too felt compelled to euthanize the one pup that bit a human,,, not happy about it it all, and felt she was only guarding her property.. but over all is was needed.
I met with the prosecutor, gave my side of the story, laid out what actions i had already taken, new gate latching system , dog no longer a concern aggressive and liability wise, and I had made a personal visit to the former cat owner (who was NOT cited for allowing the cat to roam free, a city ordinance violation i may have mentioned to the prosecutor) and paid restitution for the vet bill.
The prosecutor saw that I had accepted responsibility, acted accordingly BEFORE be so ordered by the court.. made one additional requirement he felt prudent (have the entire fence "inspected" and submit a report and have the other dog evaluated for aggressiveness and submit findings" once done charges were dropped.
(7)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
I let them know i gave a copy of my sworn statement. But I am on rear d due to injury the forward command seems to be in a fuss or maybe the rear command is making it look that way. I have never been in trouble during my ten years and this command seems to nit pick everything. Maybe I am over reacting but it just has a bad feel.
(1)
(0)
SGM Erik Marquez
SGT (Join to see) - I let them know i gave a copy of my sworn statement
that's part of it, but likley did not include your action plan, or actions already compleated nor "asking" for guidence
that's part of it, but likley did not include your action plan, or actions already compleated nor "asking" for guidence
(0)
(0)
Update: case closed turned out they didnt have the necessary paperwork to close out the report at their end. So conjucture from different sources as it moved down the line added the stressors. Thanks for the assistance.
(3)
(0)
This seems to be taking an unusually long time to get dealt with by yr command. It would seem a speedier resolution is in order if everything is 'cut and dried'. If they are going to run you up they should get on with it and not leave you twisting in the breeze, so-to-speak. Good advice from SGM Erik Marquez.
(2)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
Thank you sir. I think it is because they are forward and I am in rear-d. And I my be over thinking I have a knack for that. It just resurfaced and got me to mulling it over again.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next