Posted on May 31, 2014
Air Force Commander Relieved - Favoritism or Engaged Leadership?
15.2K
75
27
4
4
0
Responses: 16
It is hard to tell from the article. Most of the statements are from the wife and others that supported him and said was just good leadership. We don't hear from the others that actually said favortism was ahppening. Unforunately even doing the right thing can get you in trouble if it portrays in a negative way within the unit.
(7)
(0)
SSG Zachery Mitchell
Perception is a bitch. I agree, I'd like to hear the side of the Airman within the unit that percieved it to be favortism.
(0)
(0)
I wrote a very long response to this article, which I decided to not post, due to the fact that I find this case very inflaming and, on reflection, my long post veered into what is definitely unprofessional ranting. Maybe I'll put it on an account where I don't represent the military...
That said, here is your pull quote from the article for the next time it seems like that senior leader is cold/aloof/distant/uncaring: "This is a business. Commanders have to ensure they are taking care of business equally.”"
Arguably, this Officer's career has been ended by an attempt to be an engaged, caring commander. As a result, I am willing to bet a lot of other new (and future) commanders got the message loud and clear. Regardless of what the AF Reg on command responsibility says.
In all fairness, I wasn't the Investigating Officer, and there may be information that I don't know. That said, I have seen similar facts to what is reported in the AF times end careers. And I've seen others around the targeted Officer say "Roger, not me."
Reference back to the recent discussion of Es and Os dating...
That said, here is your pull quote from the article for the next time it seems like that senior leader is cold/aloof/distant/uncaring: "This is a business. Commanders have to ensure they are taking care of business equally.”"
Arguably, this Officer's career has been ended by an attempt to be an engaged, caring commander. As a result, I am willing to bet a lot of other new (and future) commanders got the message loud and clear. Regardless of what the AF Reg on command responsibility says.
In all fairness, I wasn't the Investigating Officer, and there may be information that I don't know. That said, I have seen similar facts to what is reported in the AF times end careers. And I've seen others around the targeted Officer say "Roger, not me."
Reference back to the recent discussion of Es and Os dating...
(5)
(0)
Monkey's reaction to fairness experiment
A monkey's funny reaction when he is treated unfairly.lol
This experiment sums it up: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hbb27GQ_X1I
One monkey gets an OK treat for a task and the other monkey gets a really good treat for performing the exact same task. The monkey who gets the boring treat gets angry.
I go to work, do my job, and I get a paycheck and my family lives within those means. But PFC Snuffy is kind of a screw up. He has an expensive hobby (whatever it is) and spends all of his money on that instead of taking care of his wife and kids. Then, his kid has an accident and needs special equipment and suddenly we are doing a unit fundraiser, buying his wife flowers, toys for the other kids...WHAT? Here I am, paying my bills like a sucker. Who will by crap for my family? Can we have a unit fundraiser so I can get a decent car instead of my clunker? No. Now I'm jealous because in my perception, Snuffy doesn't "deserve" the attention, money, gifts, etc. I know I would look bad if I went after Snuffy so who can I go after? Who can I make a secret IG complaint about? Hmmm...
One monkey gets an OK treat for a task and the other monkey gets a really good treat for performing the exact same task. The monkey who gets the boring treat gets angry.
I go to work, do my job, and I get a paycheck and my family lives within those means. But PFC Snuffy is kind of a screw up. He has an expensive hobby (whatever it is) and spends all of his money on that instead of taking care of his wife and kids. Then, his kid has an accident and needs special equipment and suddenly we are doing a unit fundraiser, buying his wife flowers, toys for the other kids...WHAT? Here I am, paying my bills like a sucker. Who will by crap for my family? Can we have a unit fundraiser so I can get a decent car instead of my clunker? No. Now I'm jealous because in my perception, Snuffy doesn't "deserve" the attention, money, gifts, etc. I know I would look bad if I went after Snuffy so who can I go after? Who can I make a secret IG complaint about? Hmmm...
(4)
(0)
MSgt (Join to see)
I agree. Although we do not know all the details it is easy to get caught up in the Air Force Tabloid's...excuse me... Times' version of events.
I would like to think that this commander was genuinely caring for his Airmen and that a disgruntled few decided they didn't like it.
But until we can see both sides of the story all we can do is speculate. Thank you for your viewpoint CPT Wolfer.
I would like to think that this commander was genuinely caring for his Airmen and that a disgruntled few decided they didn't like it.
But until we can see both sides of the story all we can do is speculate. Thank you for your viewpoint CPT Wolfer.
(1)
(0)
CPT (Join to see)
In my experience, which is not vast, but still significant, people will turn a blind eye to just about anything...until they get motivated not to. Whether it's something tangible like a bad evaluation or something less specific like general dislike, suddenly something that was ok, isn't. So whether what he was doing was positive or negative isn't the issue I'm intending to address. We're reading the story because someone (or a group) became motivated to make a case. When I see stories like this, I always ask myself, "why am I hearing about this?" That's the HUMINTer in me (why is this guy motivated to tell this story to the Americans).
(3)
(0)
SSG (Join to see)
Thanks for the food for thought Ma'am! That and the video was pretty entertaining too.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next