Posted on Jun 23, 2015
LTC Yinon Weiss
275K
1.75K
774
397
397
0
According to Article 2 of UCMJ, "Retired members of a regular component of the armed forces who are entitled to pay" are covered by UCMJ. Does this mean that retirees can be charged with UCMJ violations even long after retirement and when not doing anything related to the military? Has this ever happened?

http://usmilitary.about.com/od/punitivearticles/a/ucmjsubject.htm
Avatar feed
Responses: 388
SGM Mikel Dawson
1
1
0
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Zaida Tirado
1
1
0
Never
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
Cpl Sarah Ashworth Jacobs
1
1
0
Yes, you bet. If you are receiving any kind of benefits from the DOD or VA, you are still a part of that entity. So you are still subject to the UCMJ. In my opinion.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Fernando HernandezJr
1
1
0
Yes
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Joshua Carmichael
1
1
0
I've always thought that if you hold a military ID card that you are still subject to military regulations. But only if the infractions were done on a military installation. I've never known it to happen.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CPO William Horniak
1
1
0
As for being penalized by the State or Codified ordinances, that is covered only under the law enforcement acts for the state in which the crime has been committed. Codified is simply a law that has been passed the the legislative branch of the government and does not have to be adopted by any state and therefore would require a federal indictment to enforce, and no state intentionally has to adopt anything that is coded by the United States in any portion as described within the Code of Federal Regulations. The military is its open separate enforcement division and follows the UCMJ therefore the military is the only branch that can punish you as so called "double Jeopardy" and up to this point has not been changed by the supreme court, therefore failure to follow the UCMJ after your Retirement On Active Duty is still a crime in the eyes of the military.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Timothy N. Livengood
1
1
0
I figure when you are retired, you are retired. This doesn't mean that since you served 20 years or more you can just be tore up and a menace to society. You represent what you dedicated yourself to for 20 year or more. People do make mistakes, granted, but if you will penalized by the State or Codified ordinances that should be punishment enough. Just my opin
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CPO William Horniak
1
1
0
Retired On Active Duty means just that. Your official retirement date is not until the 30 year mark at which time you will receive your official retirement certificate from whoever is Commander in Chief at that particular moment. If you spend 20 years active to up to 29 years and 364 days you are officially a member of the inactive reserve component until you get that piece of paper that tells you otherwise. Until that point in time you ARE a part of the military and are subject to the uniform code of military justice.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CMSgt Larry Ward
1
1
0
Yuuuuuuuuuuuuuupppppppppp...........This happened to a Chief retired that I knew....lost his retirement pay....DWI and Death of female after a vehicle accident....
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CMSgt Larry Ward
1
1
0
Yuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuupppppppppppppp............
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close