Posted on Jun 23, 2015
LTC Yinon Weiss
292K
1.73K
755
396
396
0
According to Article 2 of UCMJ, "Retired members of a regular component of the armed forces who are entitled to pay" are covered by UCMJ. Does this mean that retirees can be charged with UCMJ violations even long after retirement and when not doing anything related to the military? Has this ever happened?

http://usmilitary.about.com/od/punitivearticles/a/ucmjsubject.htm
Avatar feed
Responses: 384
SFC Robert Ellis, Jr.
0
0
0
Retired for whatever reason........
By receiving Pay, Healthcare and Educational Benefits, you are still subjected to the UCMJ.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CPT John Lord
0
0
0
is you can be recalled for a crime that happened as a civ. can you return to correct to a disability discharge, if the errored?
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CPT Peter Peter
0
0
0
Retirement is benefit owed to service member like a company pension. Service member once retired is no longer belong to the Armed Forces therefore not subject to UCMJ. The civilian law will take affect once a service member became a civilian. If service member broke the law while serving & has not been prosecuted then I believed service member can be prosecuted after retirement.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
PO1 Ted Godfrey
0
0
0
Then easily I think that Michael Thomas Flynn a retired United States Army Lieutenant General should be looked at for this.
(0)
Comment
(0)
MSgt Gilbert Jones
MSgt Gilbert Jones
>1 y
He committed a federal crime!
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Thomas Maia
0
0
0
Personally I dont think it should be allowed. If they break the law as a civilian then they should be processed under civilian laws. I dont believe this has anything to do with military ethics. My personal opinion is that it's a way for the government to take away benefits and save money. If a service member did thier 20 or medically retired that should be the end of it. Now if the crime was committed while they were still in service, I can get behind that.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Martha Cain
0
0
0
Edited >1 y ago
Once a US soldier, sailor, marine, air force or coast guard we are morally obligated to maintain values typified by our respective service. The oath we took at entrance is carried forward at ETS. UCMJ is just the tip of the spear~made ready, in reserve... to make sure we need not~fall on it. UCMJ is ever there to inforce that sacred oath~as wire in the blood~by conscription or volunteer.
(0)
Comment
(0)
SrA Robert Brouillet
SrA Robert Brouillet
>1 y
So Air Force is exempt?
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT Martha Cain
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT Martha Cain
SGT Martha Cain
>1 y
SrA Robert Brouillet - My only brother was nearly sacrificed in the jungles of China, & as a family we never believed the Army should have split as a service. I have served with many Air Force service members. I am remiss.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
PO1 Louis Green
0
0
0
No, not after you have completed 30 years and receive the 30 letter.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CWO2 David Bertoldo
0
0
0
I'm not sure they can But after 30 years from retirement it would take an act of congress to bring you back I think
(0)
Comment
(0)
MSgt Gilbert Jones
MSgt Gilbert Jones
>1 y
Thank you!
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
A1C Karyl Parks
0
0
0
I do not believe the military should have control of people once their service is up.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
1px xxx
Suspended Profile
Yes subject to UCMJ, loss of pay and benefits isnt a huge surprise when a crime comes to public attention. Most frequently retired general officers caused political embarrassment
SGT Martha Cain
SGT Martha Cain
>1 y
The higher the profile, the closer the scrutiny. The greater the embarrassment to the respective, prior service.
(0)
Reply
(0)

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close