Posted on Oct 25, 2013
SFC Intelligence Sergeant
11.2K
88
47
5
4
1
A common complaint that comes up during discussions among NCOs is that the Army is doing itself a disservice by essentially outlawing the good, oldfashioned "smoke session". Obviously the situation varies by unit, but by and large this seems to be a common topic across duty stations. What once would have been seen as an NCO keeping good order and discipline could now land you in a heap of trouble.
Posted in these groups: United states army logo ArmyImages 20 NCOs
Avatar feed
Responses: 26
SFC Platoon Sergeant
9
9
0

SSG Brown,

In my mind, the "smoke session" has never really gotten the job done. A good leader doesn't need the power to cause their subordinates physical pain to get their point across. MG Schofield said it better than I can.

“The discipline which makes the soldiers of a free country reliable in battle is not to be gained by harsh or tyrannical treatment. On the contrary, such treatment is far more likely to destroy than to make an army. It is possible to impart instruction and to give commands in such a manner and such a tone of voice to inspire in the soldier no feeling but an intense desire to obey, while the opposite manner and tone of voice cannot fail to excite strong resentment and a desire to disobey. The one mode or the other of dealing with subordinates springs from a corresponding spirit in the breast of the commander. He who feels the respect which is due to others cannot fail to inspire in them regard for himself, while he who feels, and hence manifests, disrespect toward others, especially his inferiors, cannot fail to inspire hatred against himself.”

Major General John M. Schofield
Address to the Corps of Cadets
August 11, 1879

(9)
Comment
(0)
SFC Platoon Sergeant
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
1SG, I don't attempt to punish Soldiers. I think it's ineffective and that it's the commander's job. I focus on correcting situations detrimental to good order and discipline. If that means a Soldier's pay or time is taken away or the Soldier has to do pushups to be reminded about the standard, so be it. Ultimately, the Soldier is the only one who can decide to do the right thing or the wrong thing. I agree that there are different things that will motivate some that won't motivate others. Frankly, though, I (we) want the ones that don't need external motivation. Besides that, if I make him do pushups and he continues to mess up, I have to start the paper trail later in the game than I like. If I start from the beginning and document progress from the start, it's a much more streamlined process. I want Soldiers that can cut it. If the Soldier in question can cut it, then the counseling will simply be a written account of me helping him get better. If, on the other hand, the Soldier would fit better in a different profession, I will be able to affect that change sooner than later.
(3)
Reply
(1)
1SG Master Leader Course Facilitator
1SG (Join to see)
>1 y
I see you logic in this and don't disagree with you. What I have learned though, is that sometimes there are different ways of handling a situation. Many Soldiers could care less about a counseling statement and continue to go down a bad path. The question remains though, could you have done something different to get through to that Soldier to change them? Could a "father" like talk gotten through to them? Or maybe some corrective PT? What if those worked and you got through to them rather than give them the standard counseling? I go with what I know has worked for me in the past. In 15 years I have recommened two Art-15's, and never had to discharge anyone. Not saying I'm some awesome NCO, but I think sometimes an 19 or 19 year old kid needs a little reality check and a PT session does that, in my opinion.  I love the dialoge by the way!
(2)
Reply
(0)
SFC Observer   Controller/Trainer
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
SFC Marcus Tyler you seem to be one of the people that is the problem with soldiers now a days. You go and give them a time-out instead of whipping their butts.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SFC Platoon Sergeant
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
So I'm not sure how anything I've said would lead you to believe I don't hold Soldiers accountable as your post suggests but I rather resent the accusation.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGM Sergeant Major
5
5
0
I am sure if you asked my 1SG 18 years ago if my generation was too soft they would say yes.

The smoke session is still an available tool in the NCOs kitbag. We must watch how we use it. Like many other things that tool will only work sometimes on some Soldiers. It is not a one tool fix all.

20 years ago the majority of my NCOs didn't care if I had a financial issue or family's problem. They focused on my fault and either smoked me or encouraged me by yelling at me. Today we are taught to identify the underlying problem and fix that.

I honestly believe you are a better leader if you talk to your Soldiers instead of smoking them, but understand that a smoke session can have a great impact if used properly and at the right moment.

I also think a lot of this has come around because of society. I got smacked as a kid and my butt would be black and blue for any mistakes I made. I can honestly say that does not work on my kids. I can get through to my kids more effectively by talking and giving them a verbal dress down. Times change and we must change with them.

Find out how to get through to your Soldiers and then use the right tool for the job. If a good ole fashioned smoke session is in order do it correctly and don't abuse it. I think you will find that just talking to the Soldier will yield better results. Like I always tell my NCOs - you have to be approachable to be an effective leader.
(5)
Comment
(0)
SFC Company First Sergeant
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
1SG, nicely put. I think the smoke session has it's place but it is only one tool in the kit bag. If you try to build a house only using a hammer it will probably never work out for you. I think a lot of the younger leaders need to better learn about all the other tools in the kit bag to correct and educate Soldiers more effectively.
(2)
Reply
(0)
SGM Sergeant Major
SGM (Join to see)
>1 y
SFC Cooley,

Absolutely correct. I wish more Leaders could understand that statement.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Chemical Biological Radiological and Nuclear Operations Specialist
4
4
0
Just like anything, i believe that the Army and just society in general are taking things too far. I personally am not going to change the way I am. But I approach people differently depending on the situation. I am a firm believer that if you have a mutual unspoken agreement with the Soldier in which he/she understands the severity of the mess up, then it's all good, as long as you dont kill the individual. Now, if you are trying to 'smoke' everyone for every little thing and not wanna hear what they have to say, you just lost that tool, because Soldiers will know that they're just gonna get smoked, and will just use it to get stronger, in a sense.&nbsp;<div>Always build that bond with your Soldiers. When they see your serious face and automatically know that they messed up, you won't even need anything else. On top of that, when you're able to congratulate them for good things they did, you have become a fair and impartial leader, which we need nowadays.</div>
(4)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
Avatar feed
Are we being too soft on Soldiers?
SSG(P) Casualty Operations Ncoic
4
4
0
While I think a Soldier should be able to endure a good physical corrective training session (it does, afterall, improve physical fitness) punishment needs to fit the crime.  It is therefore, the responsibility of the correcting NCO to relate the correction to the infraction.  For example, making a Soldier who maxes his APFT do push-ups really doesn't affect him/her, does it?  Also, the object of correction is not to inflict pain, but to make the Soldier connect the corrective action to the infraction.One remedy that is usually successful is taking a Soldier's personal time.  Having a Soldier assist the Extra Duty crew takes his/her time and shows what further infraction will result in.If you are not connecting the punishment to the infraction, you are not making an impact and are failing as a leader.
(4)
Comment
(0)
SFC Platoon Sergeant
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
then why do we use the duty day to conduct remedial PT for APFT failures and overweight Soldiers? Doesn't that reward them for failing to meet the standard?
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSG(P) Casualty Operations Ncoic
SSG(P) (Join to see)
>1 y
SSG Davis: If you think Remedial PT is a reward, then the Remedial PT Program you are thinking of is ineffective. Remedial PT *should* smoke the heck out of a Soldier who has failed the APFT and/or the ABCP. Making a 60% on each APFT event is too easy; failing means you have not made the effort to keep yourself in shape and/or you lack the heart to perform at the minimum level. While I realize the height & weight standards are about 60 years behind the current averages for Americans, it is still the "law" and must be enforced. If you cannot or will not stay within standards, then you lack the discipline of a Soldier. Body-builders? Got it. That's why there is the tape test (BFI).

Remedial PT should be tough, but attainable, that not only reaches the goal, but also sends a message that you don't want to do this again. Most Remedial PT Programs I have been aware of have been after the duty day as well.
(1)
Reply
(1)
SFC Platoon Sergeant
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
SGT Unger,
You greatly misunderstand the point of my comment. It's not the remedial PT that's a reward. It's the fact that it isn't done on THEIR time. It's done during the duty day, detracting from the mission at hand, and the job they are suppose to be doing.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ Acquisition Officer
4
4
0
SSG,I do agree that the options to correct a Soldier are limited this days.  However, what once you could do with a "smoke session" must now be done with a paper trail that aims to disciple the Soilder by taking away their money which for some could be more painfull that a "smoke session.
(4)
Comment
(0)
SFC Retired
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
Sir, I disagree. Soldiers don't like losing money, but how often (I am in the Reserves as well after 13 years of Active Duty) do Soldiers get pay taken away from them in the Reserves? Not very often. They get a summarized, a harsh paper slap on the wrist, and RTD. When I smoke the shit out of Soldier for violations of policy or reg, and before the paper trail starts, they shape up. I have a nearly 100% success rate with this method. The ones I was not able to positively influence weren't long for this Army anyway. They were the ones that EVERYBODY suspected would go AWOL at the first obstruction to their service. Sure enough, that's what they did. I've been a rigger, EOD, 88M, and now I'm Civil Affairs, and it has been a consistent result in every MOS I've held and actually worked in.
(4)
Reply
(0)
MSG Telecommunications Operations Chief
MSG (Join to see)
>1 y
Dan, I think its unfortunate that the power to instantly impose physical pain by means of "smoking" has been lost to NCOs. However, I am suspicious that this has all come about because of the abuse of power. NCOs can become lazy and lack creativity in correcting and rehabilitating soldiers. I think smoking a soldier works, but when a soldier does not respond, we must create negative reinforcement that the individual will respond to. It could be monitarily, emotionally or mentally. 

Taken one step further, why is negative reinforcement the "go to" for shaping and molding subordinates? What about positive reinforcement? 
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
1SG Michael Blount
4
3
1
We are being too soft on Soldiers, and that starts at BCT, which is run by a bunch of metrics-obsessed, numbers-driven, risk-averse paper pushers.  Drill Sergeants' hands are tied so much, that we can't even use the latrine without getting a permission slip.  Don't misunderstand - there was and is no place for DS misconduct. However, the pendulum has swung so far the other way, that BCT Soldiers are weaker in both mind and body than even 15 years ago. That has got to change, and the change has to begin at BCT land.
(4)
Comment
(1)
1SG Corrections Officer
1SG (Join to see)
10 y

1SG,

I couldnt agree more, when I went to BCT, we were scared sh*tless of the DS, now there are pictures of a DS throwing gangs sings and middle fingers with IET Soldiers.  When I get a new Soldier they dont even stand at parade rest when addresing NCOs and when I blow my llid and start yelling, Ive actually been told that I'm not allowed to "smoke" them.  I usually reply with "thats under TRADOC, you're not under TRADOC anymore".  I also have 18-19 y/o PVTs that are  2 mos out of BCT and they cant pass an APFT.  One of Soldeirs admitted to failing his APFT in BCT and being "pushed" thru.  I actually had a lower enlisted call my CO because they lived next door to each other and complained that I was being "too hard" while we were in Pre Mob training. (We both volunteered to go with our BN HQ on an OEF mission). The Army as a whole has lowered its Standards and is conforming to today's "Trophy Generation".  This is the ARMY not a social club.

(0)
Reply
(0)
1SG Michael Blount
1SG Michael Blount
10 y
SFC - wanna be a drill and help fix the problem?
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
1SG Master Leader Course Facilitator
3
3
0
SSG Brown, I think we are being too soft on Soldiers. I think the good old fashion Smoke Session is long overdue for the Army, but due to a lack of maturity in our ranks, we can't trust our Junior NCO's to do it properly and with out getting themselves in trouble. The NCO corps needs to gain the leaderships trust back and then we will be able to execute corrective training that teaches Soldiers discipline and make them stronger in the process.
(3)
Comment
(0)
SFC Platoon Sergeant
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
1SG, I'm not sure it's the maturity of the junior NCOs that's the problem. I think it's more an inappropriate use of force - when things go to far that is.
(0)
Reply
(0)
1SG Master Leader Course Facilitator
1SG (Join to see)
>1 y
I agree, but what is the driving force behind appropriate use of force. A more mature soldier knows when too much is too much. That is what I have seen as the issue in my days. Everyone saw me "smoking" my squad or plt, and tried to duplicate it or one up me, and in reality I had a good check on my Soldiers and never pushed them too far. Just an observation.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CPT Daniel Walk, M.B.A.
3
3
0
Yes, we are being to soft on Soldiers. It's not because of institutional limits, its a lack of creativity on the part of senior NCOs and company grade officers. Everyone has an affinity for the romanticized "smoke sessions." When Soldiers were barely educated, minor trauma was a good learning tool. Soldiers are better educated (for what it's worth). Corrective training must adapt to that. My favorite corrective training is to make people hand copy regulations. They get time limits, and very strict rules about mistakes and errors. You might make enemies, but you will make knowledgeable enemies.
(3)
Comment
(0)
SFC Ass't Ops Nco/S3 Ncoic
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
I think a more appropriate "corrective training" should involve, retraining on the task failed, focusing on the Soldier's performance in the retraining, and involving the Soldier's leaders. I believe that menial, mind numbing tasks such as hand writing regulations only increases the Soldier's lack of respect for his leaders, the unit, and the Army...mi dos centavos
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CW3(P) Network Defense Tech
3
3
0
I do agree to a point. The paper trail is the new smoke session, as stated by CPT Montanez. I am not going to say that I have seen a soldier getting a chewing while in the front leaning rest, but that could be the "farthest" a smoke session could probably go without someone making a complaint. I have also heard the rumor of "stress cards" in BCT and AIT. We are dealing with a new generation of technology driven teenagers that are as not tough, as we were say 10 or 15 years ago when technology was not as prevalent, and the Army has recognized that and has adapted. 
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC G 1 Ncoic
3
3
0
Vital to know your Soldiers...each one is different and responds differently to different tactics.  Approach each Soldier individually, learn which ones need an aggressive NCO and which ones that almost self correct and get more out of simple positive reinforcement.
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close